The Removal Characteristics of Bromate using Various Materials in GAC Process

다양한 재질의 활성탄을 이용한 GAC 공정에서의 브로메이트 제거 특성

  • Son, Hee-Jong (Water Quality Institute, Water Authority, Busan) ;
  • Choi, Young-Ik (Department of Environmental Engineering, Dong-A University) ;
  • Jung, Chul-Woo (Ulsan Regional Innovation Agency, Ulsan Industry Promotion Techno Park) ;
  • Park, Jin-Sik (Department of Health and Environment, Kyung Woon University) ;
  • Jang, Seong-Ho (Department of Environment System Engineering, Busan University)
  • 손희종 (부산광역시 상수도사업본부 수질연구소) ;
  • 최영익 (동아대학교 환경공학과) ;
  • 정철우 (울산산업진흥TP 전략산업기획단) ;
  • 박진식 (경운대학교 보건환경학과) ;
  • 장성호 (부산대학교 지역환경시스템공학과)
  • Received : 2009.06.10
  • Accepted : 2009.08.07
  • Published : 2009.09.30

Abstract

This research was performed by means of several different virgin granular activated carbons (GAC) made of each coal, coconut and wood, and the GACs were investigated for an adsorption performance of bromate in a continuous adsorption column. Breakthrough behavior was investigated that the breakthrough points of the virgin two coals-, coconut- and wood-based GACs were observed as 9252 bed volume (BV), 6821 BV, 5291 BV and 2431 BV, respectively. The experimental results of adsorption capacity (X/M) for bromate showed that two coal- based GACs were highest (1334.5 and 798.2 ${\mu}g$/g), the coconut-based GAC was intermediate (668.6 ${\mu}g$/g) and the wood-based GAC was lowest (156.8 ${\mu}g$/g). The X/M of the coal-based GACs was 2~8.5 times higher than the X/M of the coconut-based and wood-based GACs. The results of carbon usage rates (CURs) for the virgin two coal-, coconut- and wood-based GACs were shown as 0.19, 0.25, 0.33 and 0.71 g/day respectively. The adsorption capacity, k values, were also investigated by means of the GACs for bromate. The k values of two coal-, coconut- and wood- based GACs for bromate were found to be 121.3, 76.7, 43.3 and 14.6 respectively. This results suggested that using the virgin GAC made of coal was the best selection for removal of bromate in the water treatment for an advanced treatment.

본 연구에서는 다양한 재질의 입상활성탄들을 이용하여 연속흡착실험에서 $BrO_3\;^-$의 파과특성을 조사하였다. 활성탄 재질별 파과시점은 석탄계 재질의 활성탄들이 가장 늦게 파과에 도달하였으며, 다음으로 야자계와 목탄계 재질의 활성탄으 로 나타났다. 활성탄 g당 $BrO_3\;^-$에 대한 최대 흡착량(X/M)은 석탄계 재질의 활성탄들이 각각 1334.5 ${\mu}g$/g 및 798.2 ${\mu}g$/g으로 가장 컸으며, 야자계 668.6 ${\mu}g$/g, 목탄계 156.8 ${\mu}g$/g으로 나타났고, 석탄계 활성탄들이 야자계와 목탄계에 비하여 최대 흡착량이 약 2.0배~8.5배 정도 큰 것으로 조사되었다. $BrO_3\;^-$에 대한 CUR은 석탄계 재질의 활성탄들이 각각 0.19 g/day과 0.25 g/day, 야자계와 목탄계가 각각 0.33 g/day과 0.71 g/day로 나타났다. 활성탄의 흡착용량을 나타내는 k값의 경우 석탄계 재질의 활성탄들이 각각 121.3과 76.7로 나타나 야자계와 목탄계의 43.3과 14.6에 비하여 석탄계 활성탄들이 월등히 높은 k값을 나타내어 다른 재질의 활성탄에 비하여 $BrO_3\;^-$ 흡착용량이 큰 것으로 조사되었다.

Keywords

References

  1. Haag, W. R., and Hoign$\`{e}$, J.,“Ozonation of bromide containing waters: kinetics of formation of hypobromous acid and bromate,” Environ. Sci. Technol., 17, 261-267(1983) https://doi.org/10.1021/es00111a004
  2. Weinberg, H. S., Glaze, W. H., Krasner, S. W., and Schimenti, M. J., “Formation and removal of aldehydes in plants that use ozonation,” J. Am Water Works Assoc., 85(5), 72-85(1993) https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1551-8833.1993.tb05988.x
  3. von Gunten, U., and Hoign$\`{e}$, J., “Bromate formation during ozonation of bromide containing waters: Interaction of ozone and hydroxyl radical reactions,” Environ. Sci. Technol., 28, 1234-1242(1994) https://doi.org/10.1021/es00056a009
  4. US EPA, “Guidelines for carcinogen risk assessment,” US EPA, Federal Register 51, 33992-34003(1986)
  5. US EPA, “Alternative disinfectants and oxidants,” Guidance Manual, 3.1-3.52(1999)
  6. Xie, L., and Shang, C., “The effects of operational parameters and common anions on the reactivity of zero-valent iron in bromate reduction,” Chemosphere, 66, 1652-1659(2007) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2006.07.048
  7. Gordon, G., Gauw, R. D., Emmert, G. L., Walters, B. D., and Bubnis, B., “Chemical reduction methods for bromate ion removal,” J. Am Water Works Assoc., 94, 91-98(2002)
  8. Siddiqui, M., Zhai, W., Amy, G., and Mysore, C., “Bromate ion removal by activated carbon,” Water Res., 30, 1651-1660(1996) https://doi.org/10.1016/0043-1354(96)00070-X
  9. Bao, M. L., Griffini, O., Santianni, D., Barbieri, K., Burrini, D., and Pantani, F., “Removal of bromate ion from water using granular activated carbon,” Water Res., 33, 2959-2970(1999) https://doi.org/10.1016/S0043-1354(99)00015-9
  10. Kirisits, M. J., Snoeyink, V. L., and Kruithof, J. C., "The reduction of bromate by granular activated carbon,” Water Res., 34(17), 4250-4260(2000) https://doi.org/10.1016/S0043-1354(00)00189-5
  11. Huang, W. J., and Cheng, Y. L., “Effect of characteristics of activated carbon on removal of bromate,” Sep. Sci. Technol., 59, 101-107(2008)
  12. Singer, P. C., and Bilyk, K., “Enhanced coagulation using a magnetic ion-exchange resin,” Water Res., 36, 4009-4022(2002) https://doi.org/10.1016/S0043-1354(02)00115-X
  13. Johnson, C. J., and Singer, P. C., “Impact of a magnetic ionexchange resin on ozone demand and bromate formation during drinking water treatment,” Water Res., 38, 3738-3750(2004) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2004.06.021
  14. van der Hoek, J. P., Rijnbende, D. O., Lokin, C. J. A., Bonn , P. A. C., Loonen, M. T., Hofman, J. A. M. H., “Electrodialysis as an alternative for reverse osmosis in an integrated membrane system,” Desalination, 117, 159-172(1998) https://doi.org/10.1016/S0011-9164(98)00086-1
  15. Peldszus, S., Andrews, S. A., Souza, R., Smith, F., Douglas, I., Bolton, J., and Huck, P. M., “Effect of medium-pressure UV irradiation on bromate concentrations in drinking water, a pilotscale study,” Water Res., 38, 211-217 (2004) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2003.09.010
  16. Siddiqui, M., Amy, G., Cooper, W. J., Kurucz, C. N., Waite, T. D., and Nickelsen, M. G., “Bromate ion removal by HEEB irradiation,” J. Am Water Works Assoc., 88(5), 90-101(1996) https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1551-8833.1996.tb06632.x
  17. Faust, S. D., and Aly, O. M., Adsorption Process for Water Treatment, Butterworths Publishers, Stoneham, (1987)
  18. Bansal, R. C., and Goyal, M., Activated Carbon Adsorption, CRC press, (2005)
  19. Marhaba, T. F., and Medlar, S. J., “Treatment/removal of bromate and bromide ions using GAC and RO,” Proceedings of Am Water Works Assoc. Water Qual. Technol. Conf., Miami, Florida (1993)
  20. Barton, S. S., Evans, M. J. B., Halliop, E., and MacDonald, J. A. F., “Acidic and basic sites on the surface of porous carbon,” Carbon, 35, 1361-1366(1997) https://doi.org/10.1016/S0008-6223(97)00080-8
  21. Studebaker, M. L., “The chemistry of carbon black and reinforcement,” Rubber Chem. Techno., 30, 1400-1483(1957) https://doi.org/10.5254/1.3542764
  22. Huang, C. P., “Chemical interactions between inorganics and activated carbon,” Carbon Adsorption Handbook, Cheremisinoff, P. N., and Ellerbusch, F., (Eds) pp. 281-329, Ann Arbor Science Publishers, Inc, Ann Arbor, Miami, (1978)
  23. Graham, D., “The separate effects of pore size and surface acidity upon the adsorbent capacities of activated carbons,” J. Phys. Chem., 59(8), 896-900(1955) https://doi.org/10.1021/j150531a022
  24. Yamada, H., “By-products of ozonation of low bromide waters and reduction of the by-products by activated carbon,” Proceedings of 11th IOA, (1993)
  25. Gonce, N., and Voudrais, E. A., “Removal of chlorite and chlorate ions from water using granular activated carbon,” Water Res. 28, 1059-1069(1994) https://doi.org/10.1016/0043-1354(94)90191-0
  26. Asami, M., Aizawa, T., Morioka, T., Nishijima, W., Tabata, A., and Magara, Y., “Bromate removal during transition from new granular activated carbon (GAC) to biological activated carbon (BAC),” Water Res. 33, 2797-2804(1999) https://doi.org/10.1016/S0043-1354(98)00504-1
  27. Snoeyink, V. L.,“ Adsorption of Organic Compounds,” In Water Quality and Treatment: A Handbook of Community Water Supplies, 4th Ed., Edited by Pontius, F. W., McGraw-Hill Inc., New York, 781-855(1990)
  28. 손희종, 노재순, 김상구, 배석문, 강임석, “활성탄 공정에서의 염소 소독부산물 제거특성,” 대한환경공학회지, 27(7), 762-770(2005)