동적, 정적, PNF 스트레칭이 요부 유연성에 미치는 효과

The effect of Dynamic and Static PNF stretching on lower back flexibility

  • 최원제 (한려대학교 물리치료학과) ;
  • 조남정 (한려대학교 물리치료학과) ;
  • 강희권 (한려대학교 물리치료학과) ;
  • 강수경 (한려대학교 물리치료학과) ;
  • 김민정 (한려대학교 물리치료학과) ;
  • 김병오 (한려대학교 물리치료학과) ;
  • 허수용 (한려대학교 물리치료학과) ;
  • 유병국 (한려대학교 물리치료학과) ;
  • 이삼철 (한려대학교 물리치료학과) ;
  • 손경현 (한려대학교 물리치료학과)
  • 투고 : 2009.05.10
  • 심사 : 2009.06.15
  • 발행 : 2009.06.28

초록

Purpose : The purpose of this study is to find out which method is efficient to enhance the flexibility of lower back between PNF(Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation), static and dynamic stretching. Methods : Subjects were 30 young people between the ages 17 and 19. They were randomly divided into three groups; static group(n=10) performed a static stretching, dynamic group(n=10) performed a dynamic stretching, and PNF group(n=10) performed a PNF stretching. Intervention was provided 5 days per week for 4 weeks. For each case, Trunk flexion forward, trunk flexion backward, trunk left lateral bending, trunk right lateral bending, trunk flexion forward a measuring instrument and tapeline were performed to measured the flexibility of lower back at different times(before starting the exercise, after 4 weeks). Results : The results of the study reveal that the lower back flexibility was a statistically significant difference in all groups(p<.05). There was statistically significant difference between PNF group and static group, PNF group and dynamic group. Conclusion : The finding indicated that PNF may be preferred technique for improving flexibility, and that flexibility training results in an increased consistency of flexibility scores.

키워드