Journal of Contemporary Eastern Asia

World Association for Triple Helix and Future Strategy Studies (세계트리플헬릭스미래전략학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Podcasting and Politics in Singapore: An Experimental Study of Medium Effects

  • Skoric, Marko M. (Wee Kim Wee School of Communication and Information, Nanyang Technological University) ;
  • Sim, Clarice (Wee Kim Wee School of Communication and Information, Nanyang Technological University) ;
  • Juan, Han Teck (Wee Kim Wee School of Communication and Information, Nanyang Technological University) ;
  • Fang, Pam (Wee Kim Wee School of Communication and Information, Nanyang Technological University)
  • Published : 2009.09.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

A ban on political podcasting during the General Elections 2006 in Singapore was justified by the Singaporean government on the grounds that the new medium had a greater power to influence voters than traditional modes of political discourse. A between-subjects controlled experiment was conducted to test whether podcasts of political speeches had a greater power to influence voters' evaluations of political candidates and likelihood of voting for them than online text-based transcripts of the same speeches. The study also examined whether mere exposure to political speeches online, irrespective of the modality, had an effect on voters' more general political preferences, i.e. the likelihood of support and voting for the opposition. The findings suggest that political podcasts were no more persuasive than text-based websites and that the effects on political preferences, if any, were likely due the exposure to political content online, not because of the nature of the medium. The implications of the findings are discussed.

Keywords

References

  1. Adamic, L. A., & Glance, N. (2005). The political blogosphere and the 2004 US election; Divided they blog, HP labs and Intelliseek Applied Research Center. Retrieved August 20th, 2007 from www.blogpulse.com/papers/2005/AdamicGlance-BlogWWW.pdf.
  2. Advisory Council on the Impact of New Media on Society (AIMS). (2008, December). Engaging New Media: Challenging Old Assumptions. Retrieved 25 June, 2009, from http://www.aims.org.sg/library/docs/AIMS%20Report%20(Dec%2008)%20-%20Engaging%20New%20Media,%20Challenging%20Old%20Assumptions.pdf
  3. Becker, L., & Whitney, D. C. (1980). Effects of media dependencies: Audience assessment of government. Communication Research, 7(1), 95-120. https://doi.org/10.1177/009365028000700105
  4. Berry, R. (2006). Will the iPod kill the radio star? Profiling podcasting as radio. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies, 12(2), 143-162. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354856506066522
  5. Bimber, B., & Davis, R. (2003). Campaigning online: The Internet in U.S. elections. New York: Oxford Publishing Press.
  6. Black, D. A. (2001). Internet radio: A case study in medium specificity. Media, culture and society, 23, 397-408. https://doi.org/10.1177/016344301023003007
  7. Bositis, D. A., & Steinel, D. (1987). A synoptic history and typology of experimental research in political science. Political Behavior, 9(3), 263-284. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00988616
  8. Brock, T. C. (1967). Communication discrepancy and intent to persuade as determinants of counterargument production. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 3(296-309). https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031(67)90031-5
  9. Brown, K. (1978). A comparison of factual recall from film and print stimuli. Journalism Quarterly, 55(350-353). https://doi.org/10.1177/107769907805500223
  10. Carr, D. (2008, November 9). How Obama tapped into social networks' power. New York Times. Retrieved 20 June, 2009, from http://www.nytimes.com/2008/11/10/business/media/10carr.html?_r=1&scp=22&sq=obama%20new%20media&st=cse
  11. Chaffee, S., & Frank, S. (1996). How Amercians get political information: Print versus broadcast news. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Sciences, 546(48), 48-58. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716296546001005
  12. Chaffee, S., & Tims, A. R. (1982). News media use in adolescence: Implications for political cognitions. In M. Burgoon (Ed.), Communication Yearbook 6 (pp. 736-758). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
  13. Chaffee, S., Zhao, X., & Leshner, G. (1994). Political knowledge and the campaign media of 1992. Communication Research, 21(3), 305-324. https://doi.org/10.1177/009365094021003004
  14. Cheong, J. (2006, January 4). Pod luck; Read me...now hear me - after blogs, podcasting is the next big thing as more Singaporeans jostle to be heard on the Internet. Straits Times.
  15. Chia, S.-A. (2006). Singapore: Govt explains ban on political podcasts. Straits Times.
  16. Chia, S.-A., Low, A., & Luo, S. (2006). Oppositional parties slam podcast ban rule; Mixed reactions among bloggers here, but guidelines clearer now. Straits Times.
  17. Chua, H. H. (2006, November 10). Singapore's blog-happy teenagers; Survey to assess how netsavvy people are find half of teens have online blogs of podcast. Straits Times.
  18. Clark, R. (1983). Reconsidering research on learning from media. Review of Educational Research, 53(4), 445-459. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543053004445
  19. Cohen, E. L., & Willis, C. (2004). One nation under radio: digital and public memory after September 11. New media & Society, 6(5), 591-610. https://doi.org/10.1177/146144804047082
  20. Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 155-159. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.155
  21. Coleman, S. (2005). Blogs and the new politics of listening. The Political Quarterly, 76(2), 272-280. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-923X.2005.00679.x
  22. Culbertson, H., & Stempel, G. H. I. (1986). How media use and reliance affect knowledge level. Communication research, 13(579-602). https://doi.org/10.1177/009365086013004004
  23. Dalrymple, K. E., & Scheufele, D. A. (2007). Finally informing the electorate? How the internet got people thinking about presidential politics in 2004. The Harvard International Journal of Press-Politics, 12(3), 96-111. https://doi.org/10.1177/1081180X07302881
  24. DeLys, S., & Foley, M. (2006). The exchange. A Radio-Web Project for Creative Practitioners and Researchers. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies, 12(2), 129-135. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354856506066112
  25. Dorning, M. (2007, February 16). Political web sites get personal: Candidates let backers write blogs, network. Chicago Tribune.
  26. Eagly, A. H., Wood, W., & Chaiken, S. (1978). Causal inferences about communicators and their effect on opinion change. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 424-435. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.36.4.424
  27. Eldersveld, S. J. (1951). Theory and method in voting behavior research. The Journal of Politics, 13(1), 70-87. https://doi.org/10.2307/2126123
  28. Eldersveld, S. J. (1956). Experimental propaganda techniques and voting behavior. The American Political Science Review, 50(1), 154-165. https://doi.org/10.2307/1951603
  29. Eveland, W. P. J., & Dunwoody, S. (2002). An investigation of elaboration and selective scanning as mediators of learning from the web versus print. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 46, 34-53. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15506878jobem4601_3
  30. Eveland, W. P. J., Seo, M., & Marton, K. (2002). Learning from the news in campaign 2000: An experimental comparison of TV news, newspapers, and online news. Media Psychology, 4, 355-380.
  31. Furnham, A., & Gunter, B. (1987). Effects of time of day and medium of presentation on immediate recall of violent and non-violent news. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 1(4), 255-262. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.2350010404
  32. Furnham, A., Gunter, B., & Green, A. (1990). Remembering science: The recall of factual information as a function of the presentation mode. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 4(3), 203-212. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.2350040305
  33. George, C. (2005). The internet's political impact and the penetration/participation paradox in Malaysia and Singapore. Media, Culture & Society, 27(6), 903-920. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443705057678
  34. Gerber, A. S., Green, D. P., & Shachar, R. (2003). Voting may be habit-forming: Evidence from a randomized field experiment. American Journal of Political Science, 47(3), 540-550. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-5907.00038
  35. Gonsell, H. F., & Gill, N. H. (1935). An analysis of the 1932 presidential vote in Chicago. The American Political Science Review, 29(6), 967-984. https://doi.org/10.2307/1947313
  36. Government's response to the recommendations made by the advisory council on the impact of new media on society (AIMS) in the report "engaging new media - challenging old assumptions". (2009, January). Retrieved 25 June, 2009, from http://www.aims.org.sg/library/docs/Govt%20Response%20to%20AIMS%20Report%20(9Jan09).pdf
  37. Hammersley, B. (2004). Audible Revolution, Media Guardian. Retrieved December 8th, 2006 from http://technology.guardian.co.uk/online/story/0,3605,1145689,00.html.
  38. Heim, J., Asting, T., & Schliemann, T. (2002). Medium effects on persuasion. NordiCHI, October 19-23, 259-261.
  39. iDA. (2006). Infocomm usage - Households & Individual. Retrieved September 18th, 2007 from http://www.ida.gov.sg/Publications/20070822125451.aspx.
  40. Just, M., & Crigler, A. (1989). Learning from the news: Experiments in media, modality, and reporting about star wars. Political Communication and Persuasion, 6, 109-127. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.1989.9962867
  41. Kozma, R. B. (1994). Will media influence learning? Reframing the debate. Educational Technology Research & Development, , 42(2), 7-19.
  42. Lee, L. (2006, April 25). Party flouts rules with Chee's podcast on its website. Straits Times.
  43. Lewicki, D., & Ziaukas, T. (2000). The digital tea leaves of Election 2000: The Internet and the future of presidential politics. First Monday, 5(12).
  44. Lewin, J. (2008, November 5). How Barrack Obama beat John McCain with new media. Podcasting News. Retrieved 20 June, 2009, from http://www.podcastingnews.com/2008/11/05/how-barack-obama-beat-john-mccain-with-new-media/
  45. Lowry, D. T. (1973). Demographic similarity, attitudinal similarity, and attitude change. The Public Opinion Quarterly, 37(2), 192-208. https://doi.org/10.1086/268077
  46. MacDonald, J. F., Marsden, M. T., & Geist, C. D. (1980). Radio and television studies and American culture. American Quarterly, 32(3), 301-317. https://doi.org/10.2307/2712452
  47. Malone, J. (2007, April 6). Obama's online organizing far outpaces competitors. Cox News Service.
  48. McLeod, J. M., & McDonald, D. G. (1985). Beyond simple exposure: Media orientations and their impact on political processes. Communication Research, 12(1), 3-33.
  49. McLuhan, M. (1964). Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  50. McLuhan, M. (1967). The medium is the message. London: Allen Lane.
  51. Media watchdog slams podcast ban. (2006, April 30th). The Straits Times.
  52. Miller, M. M., Singletary, M. W., & Chen, S. (1988). The roper question and television vs newspapers as sources of news. Journalism Quarterly, 65(1), 12-19. https://doi.org/10.1177/107769908806500102
  53. Miskin, S., & Grant, R. (2004). Political advertising in Australia. Australia: Parliament of Australia.
  54. Nah, S., Veenstra, A. S., & Shah, D. V. (2006). The Internet and anti-war activism: A case study of information, expression, and action. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12(1), 230-247. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2006.00323.x
  55. Norris, P., & Sanders, D. (2003). Message or medium? Campaign learning during the 2001 British general election. Political Communication, 20, 233-262. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584600390218878
  56. OFCOM. (2005). Radio-preparing for the future. Retrieved December 12th, 2006 from http://www.ofcom.org.uk/consult/condocs/radio_review/radio_review2/radio_review.pdf.
  57. Paolino, P., & Shaw, D. R. (2003). Can the Internet help outside candidates win the presidential nomination? Political Science and Politics, 36(2), 193-197. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096503002063
  58. Patterson, T. E., & McClure, R. (1976). The unseeing eye: The myth of television power in national elections. New York: G. P. Putnam's Sons.
  59. Petty, R. E., & Wegener, D. T. (1998). Attitude change: Multiple roles for persuasion variables. In D. Gilbert, S. Fiske & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social pscyhology (4 ed., Vol. 1, pp. 323-390). New York: McGraw-Hill.
  60. Reese, S. D., Rutigliano, L., Hyun, K., & Jeong, J. (2007). Mapping the blogosphere: Professional and citizen-based media in the global news arena. Journalism, 8(3), 235-261. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884907076459
  61. Rodan, G. (1998). The Internet and political control in Singapore. Political Science Quarterly, 113(1), 63-89. https://doi.org/10.2307/2657651
  62. Rubin, D. B. (2004). Teaching statistical inference for causal effects in experiments and observational studies. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 29(3), 343-367. https://doi.org/10.3102/10769986029003343
  63. Schramm, W. (1997). Big media, little media. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
  64. Schulman, G., & Worrall, C. (1970). Salience patterns, source credibility, and the sleeper effect. The Public Opinion Quarterly, 34, 371-382. https://doi.org/10.1086/267813
  65. Singapore Statutes Online. (n.d.). Parliamentary Elections Act. Retrieved December 8th, 2006 from http://statutes.agc.gov.sg/.
  66. Smith, A. (2009). The Internet's role in campaign 2008. Washington, DC: Pew Internet & American Life Project. Retrieved 25 June, 2009, from http://www.pewinternet.org/-/media//Files/Reports/2009/The_Internets_Role_in_Campaign_2008.pdf
  67. Stauffer, J., Frost, R., & Rybolt, W. (1981). Recall and learning from broadcast news: Is print better? Journal of Broadcasting, 25(2), 253-262. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838158109386449
  68. Stelter, B. (2008, July 7). The facebooker who friended Obama. New York Times. Retrieved 20 June, 2009, from http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/07/technology/07hughes.html?scp=79&sq=obama%20new%20media&st=cse
  69. Sternthal, B., Phillips, L. W., & Dholakia, R. (1978). The persuasive effect of source credibility: A situational analysis. The Public Opinion Quarterly, 42(3), 285-314. https://doi.org/10.1086/268454
  70. Stromer-Galley, J. (2000). On-line interaction and why candidates avoid it. Journal of Communication, 50, 111-132. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2000.tb02865.x
  71. Sundar, S. S., Kalyanaraman, S., & Brown, J. (2003). Explicating web site interactivity: Impression formation effects in political campaign sites. Communication Research, 30, 30-59. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650202239025
  72. Sundar, S. S., Narayan, S., Obregon, R., & Uppal, C. (1998). Does web advertising work? Memory for print vs. online media. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 75(4), 822-835. https://doi.org/10.1177/107769909807500414
  73. Sung-Ki, J. (2007, February 4th). Web users back opposition party. Korea Times.
  74. Tae-gyu, K. (2007, February 12th). UCC looms as national priority. Korea Times.
  75. Tannebaum, D. A., & Kerrick, J. (1954). Effects of newscasts' items leads upon listener interpretation. Journalism quarterly, 21, 33-37.
  76. Terdiman, D. (2004). You, Too, Can Be a Podcaster, Wired news. Retrieved December 10th, 2006 from http://www.wired.com/news/technology/0,1282,66133,00.html.
  77. Tewksbury, D., & Althaus, S. L. (2000). Differences in knowledge acquisition among readers of the paper and online versions of a national newspaper. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 77(3), 457-479. https://doi.org/10.1177/107769900007700301
  78. Tichenor, P. J., Donohue, G. A., & Olien, C. N. (1970). Mass media flow and differential growth in knowledge. Public Opinion Quarterly, 34(2), 159-170. https://doi.org/10.1086/267786
  79. Trammell, K. D., Tarkowski, A., Hofmokl, J., & Sapp, A. M. (2006). Rzeczpospolita blogow [Republic of blog]: Examining polish bloggers through content analysis. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 11(3), 702-722. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2006.00032.x
  80. Trammell, K. D., Williams, A. P., Postelnicu, M., & Landreville, K. D. (2006). Evolution of online campaigning: Increasing interactivity in candidate web sites and blogs through text and technical features. Mass Communication & Society, 9(1), 21-44. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327825mcs0901_2
  81. Tremayne, M., Zheng, N., Lee, J. K., & Jeong, J. (2006). Issue publics on the web: Applying network theory to the war blogosphere. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 112(1), 290-310.
  82. Vella, M. (2007, January 22). John Edwards, the e-candidate; The presidential hopeful's web efforts show the benefits and limits of using emerging media to gain an early edge in the '08 campaign. Business Week Online.
  83. Wall, T. (2004). The political economy of Internet radio. Radio Journal, 2(1), 27-44.
  84. Wilson, C. E. (1974). The effect of medium on loss of information. Journalism Quarterly, 51, 111-115. https://doi.org/10.1177/107769907405100118
  85. Wood, W., & Kallgren, C. A. (1988). Communicator attributes and persuasion: Recipients access to attitude-relevant information in memory. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 14, 172-182. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167288141017

Cited by

  1. How are newspaper companies using social media to engage and connect with their audiences? characteristics and forms of Korean newspapers’ YouTube use vol.48, pp.5, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-013-9931-4