Korean Journal of Health Education and Promotion (보건교육건강증진학회지)

Korean Society for Health Education and Promotion (한국보건교육건강증진학회)
권호 표지

Examination of Generating Mechanism Concerning Father's Participation in Child-rearing

맞벌이 가정 부친의 육아참가 발생과정

  • Park, Ji-Sun (Graduate school of Health and Welfare, Okayama Prefectural University) ;
  • Kondo, Rie (Faculty of Health and Welfare Science, Okayama Prefectural University) ;
  • Kim, Jung-Suk (Gyeongnam Provincial Government Countermeasures for Low Birthrate & Aging Society Division) ;
  • Sasai, Tsukasa (National Institute of Population and Social Security Research Department of Population Dynamics Research) ;
  • Takahashi, Shigesato (National Institute of Population and Social Security Research Deputy Director-General) ;
  • Park, Chun-Man (Department of Public Health, Keimyung University) ;
  • Nakajima, Kazuo (Faculty of Health and Welfare Science, Okayama Prefectural University)
  • Received : 2009.12.01
  • Accepted : 2009.12.12
  • Published : 2009.12.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Objectives: This purpose of this study was to make clear the fitness to data of the causality model related to father's child-rearing participation in a double-income household. Methods: Subjects of this survey consisted of the fathers of 2,006 households that use 21 day-care centers and 4 kindergartens whose cooperation was received via the city government departments that have jurisdiction over day-care centers and kindergartens in cities A and B in prefecture I and in city C in prefecture II (city A: 499 households; city B: 1,113 households; city C: 988 households). The surveyed items consisted of the father's age, the father's educational history, the number of children, the age of the youngest child, the father's parental-role awareness, the father's daily working hours, the father's return-home time, and child-rearing participation by the father. Results: The fit indices were found to be CFI = 0.912, GFI = 0.948, and RMSEA = 0.082. Regarding the path coefficients, the path coefficient of the pathway from the age of the youngest child to the father's parent positivity (0.08) and the path coefficient of the pathway from the father's parent positivity to child-rearing participation (0.19) were both at statistically significant levels. Also, the father's return-home time and the working hours, which were considered as disincentives exhibited a direct effect on child-rearing participation without being influenced by the father's parent positivity or parent negativity. The path coefficient of the pathway from return-home time to child-rearing participation was -0.43, and the path coefficient of the pathway from working hours to child-rearing participation was -0.13. The value of the path coefficient expressing the relationship between the return-home time and working hours was 0.80. Conclusion: Authors infered that it'll be the basic material to build a generation mechanism about vanity and father's child-rearing participation appropriately as a result of this research.

목적: 이 연구는 맞벌이 가정의 부친의 육아참가 발생과정을 인과관계모델로 구축하여 이 모델에 대한 데이터로의 적합성에 대해 검토하는 것을 목적으로 하였다. 방법: 조사대상은 I 현 A,B시, II현 C시의 어린이집 21곳과 유치원 4곳을 이용하는 2,006세대(A시:499세대, B시:1113세대, C시:98세대)의 부친으로 하였다. 조사내용은 부친의 연령, 학력, 자녀수, 막내자녀나이, 부모역할관, 1일 노동시간, 귀가시간, 육아참가로 구성하였다. 결과: 부친의 육아참가 발생과정 모델의 데이터로의 적합성에 대해 검토한 결과, 적합도 지표는 CFI=0.912, RMSEA=0.082였다. 경로계수를 살펴보면, 막내자녀나이에서 긍정적 부모역할관으로 향하는 경로계수는 0.08, 긍정적 부모역할관에서 육아참가로 향하는 경로계수는 0.19로 통계학적으로 유의하였다. 또한 저해요인으로서 상정한 귀가시간과 1일 노동시간은 부친의 긍정적/부정적 부모역할관으로부터 영향을 받지 않고, 육아참가에 직접효과를 나타내었다. 이때, 귀 시간에서 육아참가로 향하는 경로계수는 -0.43, 노동시간에서 육아참가로 향하는 경로계수는 -0.13, 귀가시간과 노동시간 간의 상관계수는 0.80이었다. 결론: 이상의 결과를 통해 본 연구에서 제기한 모델의 타당성을 증명하였고, 부친의 육아참가 발생 매커니즘에 관한 기초자료로 활용될 수 있음을 시사한다.

Keywords

References

  1. Aoki Satoko and Iwatate Kyoko. 2005. Determinants of paternal involvement in childcare;the analysis of differences between mother's and father's belief. Bulletin of Tokyo Gakugei University.Series 156:79-85.(In Japanese)
  2. Connelly, R. 1992. The Effect of Child Care Costs on Married Women's Labor Force Participation. Review of Economics and Statistics 74(1):83-90 https://doi.org/10.2307/2109545
  3. Gable, S., Belsky, J. and Crnic, K. 1992. Marriage, Parenting, and Child Development: Progress and Prospects. Journal of Family Psychology 5(3-4):276-294 https://doi.org/10.1037/0893-3200.5.3-4.276
  4. Gronau, R. 1977. Leisure, Home Production, and Work-the Theory of the Allocation of Time Revisited. Journal of Political Economy 85(6):1099-1123 https://doi.org/10.1086/260629
  5. Hallberg, D. and Klevmarken, A. 2003. Time for children: A study of parent's time allocation. Journal of Population Economics 16(3):205-226 https://doi.org/10.1007/s001480200133
  6. Hiller, Dana V. 1984. Power Dependence and Division of Family Work. Sex Roles 10:1003-1019 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00288521
  7. Masako, Ishii-Kuntz. 1992. Are Japanese Families ‘Fatherless’?. Sociology and Sociological Research 76(3):105-110
  8. Masako, Ishii-Kuntz. 2004. Father's Involvement and School-Aged Children's Sociability: A comparison between Japan and the United States. Japanese Journal of Family Sociology 16(1):83-93.(In Japanese) https://doi.org/10.4234/jjoffamilysociology.16.83
  9. Kamo, Yoshinori. 1988. Determinants of Household Division of Labor: Resources, Power, and Ideology. Journal of Family Issues 9(2):177-200 https://doi.org/10.1177/019251388009002002
  10. Kamo, Yoshinori. 1994. Division of Household Work in the United States and Japan. Journal of Family Issues 15(3):348-378 https://doi.org/10.1177/019251394015003002
  11. Kato Kuniko, Ishii Kuntz Masako, Katsuko Makino, Michiko Tsuchiya. 1998. Factors determine father's participation in child-rearing. The journal of Family Education Research Center 20:38-47. (In Japanese)
  12. Kohara Miki. 2000. Long commuting time and market labor・housework. The Monthly journal of the Japan Institute of Labour 476:35-45.(In Japanese)
  13. Lazarus, R.S. & Folkman, S. 1984. Stress, appraisal, and coping. New York: Springer Publishing Campany
  14. Lazarus, R.S. & Folkman, S. 1987. Transactional theory and research on emotions and coping. European Journal of Personality 1:141-169 https://doi.org/10.1002/per.2410010304
  15. Lee Ki-pyong. 2008. The effect of husband's participation in household work on wife's marital satisfaction: introducing the concept of the expectation sufficiency. Japanese journal of family sociology 20(1):70-80.(In Japanese) https://doi.org/10.4234/jjoffamilysociology.20.70
  16. Matsuda Shigeki, Suzuki Yukio. 2002. Relation of Labor Time and Domestic Labor Time of the couple. Japanese Journal of Family Sociology 13(2):73-84.(In Japanese)
  17. Matsuda Shigeki. 2006. Level and change of determinants of father's participation in housework and child-rearing. Japanese journal of research on household economics 71:45-54. (In Japanese)
  18. Ministry of International Affairs and Communications. 2006. Basic Survey on Social Life.(In Japanese)
  19. Mizuochi Masaaki. 2006a. Father's participation in child-rearing and allocation of housework. Japanese journal of research on household economics 71:55-63.(In Japanese)
  20. Mizuochi Masaaki. 2006b. Allocation behavior of housework and Father's participation in child-rearing. The Quarterly of social security research 42(3): 149-164.(In Japanese)
  21. Morishita Yoko and Iwatate Kyoko. 2009. How does the birth of the first child make the father change? Bulletin of Tokyo Gakugei University 60: 9-18.(In Japanese)
  22. Nagahisa Hisako, Kashiwagi Keiko, Kang Ran-Hye. 2004. Cross-cultural study between Japan-Korea regarding Value of children and responsibility of having child in fathers. Journal of Bunkyo Gakuin University 6(1): 43-59.(In Japanese)
  23. National Institute of Population and Social Security Research. 2000. The 2nd national survey on family in Japan.(In Japanese)
  24. National Women's education center of Japan. 2005. International Comparative Study on Child Raising and Family Life 2004, 2005.(In Japanese)
  25. Nishioka, H. 1998. Men's Domestic Role and the Gender System: Determinants of Husband's Household Labor in Japan. Journal of Population Problems 54(3):56-71
  26. Oaxaca, Ronald. 1973. Male-Female Wage Differentials in Urban Labor Markets. International Economic Review 14:693-709 https://doi.org/10.2307/2525981
  27. Sakai Kazufumi. 2007. A Comparative Analysis of the Shortness of Weekday Contact between Father and Child in Japan and Korea : How This Influences the Father-Child Relationship and the Factors That Contribute to the Short Contact Time. Journal of the National Women's Education Center of Japan 11:11-22.(In Japanese)
  28. Sasai Yasuyuki. 1996. Paternal development and family systems-A viewpoint of life-span perspective-. The Annual Report of Educational Psychology in Japan 35:137-146.(In Japanese)
  29. Shelton, Beth A. and John, Daphne. 1996. The Division of Household Labor. Annual Review of Sociology 22:299-322 https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.22.1.299
  30. Shibata Aiko and Boyles Corine. 1996. Allocation of living hours. The Journal of Japan Economic Research 32:133-148.(In Japanese)
  31. Shimizu Naoko, Sumioka Rieko, Kishida Mayuki and Manabe Emiko. 2008. Child-rearing father's Stressors, Stress-Responses and Stress-Copings during Childcare Period. Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine 17:79-86.(In Japanese)
  32. Solberg, E.J. and Wong, D.C. 1992. Family Time Use: Leisure, Home Production, Market Work, and Work Related Travel. Journal of Human Resources 27(3):487-510
  33. Suemori Kei and Ishihara Kunio. 1998. The husband's housework accomplishment and wife's marital relations satisfaction. Journal of population problems 54(3): 39-55.(In Japanese)
  34. Theodore, N. Greenstein. 1996. Husbands' participation in domestic labor: Interactive effects of wives' and husbands' gender ideologies. Journal of Marriage and Family 58:585-595 https://doi.org/10.2307/353719
  35. Tsuya, Noriko O. 2000. Female Empowerment, Marriage Postponent, and Gender Relations in Japan: An Intergenerational Perspective. Pp.318-348 in Women's Empowerment and Demographic Processes by Harriet B. Pressere and Gita Sen (eds.)
  36. Ueda, A. 2005. Intrafamily time allocation of housework: evidence from Japan. Journal of the Japanese and International Economies 19(1): 1-23.(In Japanese) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jjie.2003.12.002