매복 하악 제3대구치 발치와에 Atelo-collagen Sponge 삽입이 제2대구치 예후에 미치는 영향

THE EFFECTS OF ATELO-COLLAGEN SPONGE INSERTION ON THE PERIODONTAL HEALING OF SECOND MOLARS AFTER IMPACTED MANDIBULAR THIRD MOLAR EXTRACTION

  • 남진우 (단국대학교 치과대학 구강악안면외과학교실) ;
  • 김경욱 (단국대학교 치과대학 구강악안면외과학교실)
  • Nam, Jin-Woo (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial surgery, College of Dentistry, Dankook University) ;
  • Kim, Kyung-Wook (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial surgery, College of Dentistry, Dankook University)
  • 발행 : 2009.04.30

초록

Extracellular matrix(ECM) is known to function as a reservoir of endogenous growth factors, can be an effective delivery system of growth factor that easily lost bioactivity in solution. Fibrillar collagens like type I collagen, are the major constituent of the ECM and structural protein of bone. Also, it can be a scaffold for osteoblast migration. The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of absorbable Atelo-collagen Sponge($Teruplug^{(R)}$) insertion in tooth extraction sites on periodontal healing of the mandibular second molar after the extraction of the impacted third molar. The study population comprised 31 cases who had been scheduled for surgical removal of impacted mandibular third molars. All patients were in good general health and were not using any medication that would influence wound healing after surgery. In 15 cases control group, none was inserted into the tooth extraction site. In 16 cases experimental groups, $Teruplug^{(R)}$ was inserted into the tooth extraction site. We evaluated tooth mobility, pocket depth, gingival margin level preoperatively and 1 week, 2 weeks, 4 weeks, and 3 months postoperatively. The change was compared with two groups using Mann-Whitney test. The results were as follows. 1. There was no significant change of tooth mobility on both groups. 2. There was tendency of decreasing of previous pocket depth causing tooth extraction on both groups. 3. On gingival margin level, there was various change according to initial swelling and loss of attachment on both groups. 4. There was tendency of decreasing of gingival margin level on both groups because of removal of inflammation and decreasing of previous pocket depth. 5. There was large change of pocket depth on buccal middle, distal, lingual distal area because of tooth extraction and bone reduction. Compared with the control group and experimental group, we observed significant difference during some periods. The results of this study suggest that absorbable atelo-collagen sponge($Teruplug^{(R)}$) is relatively favorable bone void filler with prevention of tissue collapse, food packing and enhance periodontal healing.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Ash M, Costich E, Haywarf J : A study of periodontal hazards of 3rd molars. J Periodontal 1962;33:209 https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1962.33.3.209
  2. Szmyd L, Hester WR : Crevicular depth of the second molar in impacted third molar surgery. J Oral Surg Anesth Hosp Dent Serv 1963;21:185
  3. Grondahl HG, Lekholm U : Influence of mandibular third molars on related supporting tissue. Int J Oral Surg 1973;2:137 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-9785(73)80030-4
  4. Jakse N, BanKaoglu V, Wimmer G : Primary wound healing after lower third molar surgery: Evaluation of 2 different flap designs. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2002;93:7 https://doi.org/10.1067/moe.2002.119519
  5. Kugelberg CF : Periodontal healing two and four years after impacted lower third molar surgery. A comparative restospective study. Int J Oral Maxillofacial Surg 1990;19:341 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0901-5027(05)80077-3
  6. Kugelberg CF, Ahlstrom U, Ericson S : The influence of anatomical, pathophysiological and other factors on periodontal healing. J Clin Periodontol 1991;18:37 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.1991.tb01117.x
  7. S.P. Bruder, B.S. Fox : Tissue engineering of bone-cell based strategies. Clin Orthop 1999;367-S:S68-S83 https://doi.org/10.1097/00003086-199910001-00008
  8. K.J.L. Burg, S. Porter, J.F. Kellam : Biomaterial developments for bone tissue engineering. Biomaterials 2000;21:2347-2359 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-9612(00)00102-2
  9. C.A. Kirker-Hand : Potential applications and delivery strategies for bone morphogenetic proteins. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 2000;43:65-92 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-409X(00)00078-8
  10. I. Vlodavsky, Z. Fuks, R. Ishai-Michaeli, P. Bashkin, E. Levi, G. Korner, et al. : Extracellular matrix-resident basic fibroblast growth factor: implication for the control of angiogenesis. J Cell Biochem 1991;45(2):167-176 https://doi.org/10.1002/jcb.240450208
  11. E. Schonherr, H.J. Hausser : Extracellular matrix and cytokines : a functional unit. Dev Immunol 2000;7(2-4):89-101 https://doi.org/10.1155/2000/31748
  12. J.E. Babensee, L.V. McIntire, A.G. Mikos : Growth factor delivery for tissue engineering. Pharm Res 200;17(5):497-504 https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007502828372
  13. G. Bergers, R. Brekken, G. McMahon, T.H. Vu, T. Itoh, K. Tamaki, et al. : Matrix metalloproteinase-9 triggers the angiogenic switch during carcinogenesis. Nat Cell Biol 2000;2(10) :737-744 https://doi.org/10.1038/35036374
  14. Akihiro Kanematsu, Akira Marui, Shingo Yamamoto, Makoto Ozeki, Yoshiaki Hirano, Masaya Yamamoto, et al. : Type I collagen can function as a reservoir of basic fibroblast growth factor. J of Cont Release 2004;99:281-292 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconrel.2004.07.008
  15. Lenaldo B. Rocha, Gilberto Goissis, Marcos A. Rossi : Biocompatibility of anionic collagen matrix as scaffold for bone healing : Biomaterials 2002;23:449-456 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-9612(01)00126-0
  16. Pachence JM : Collagen-based devices for soft tissue repair. J Biomed Mater Res 1996;33:35-40 https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(199621)33:1<35::AID-JBM6>3.0.CO;2-N
  17. Delbalso AM, Adrian JC : Collagen gel in osseous defects : a preliminary study. Oral surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1976;42:562-9 https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-4220(76)90205-X
  18. Mitchell R : An evaluation of bone healing in cavities in the jaws implanted with a collagen matrix. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1992;30:180-2 https://doi.org/10.1016/0266-4356(92)90153-A
  19. DeLustro F, Smith ST, Sundsmo J, Salem G, Kincaid S, Ellingsworth L : Reaction to injectable collagen : results in animal model and clinical use. Plast reconstr Surg 1987;79:581-94 https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-198704000-00012
  20. Kamer FM, Churukian MM : Clinical use of injectable collagen : a three year retrospective review. Arch Otolaryngol 1984;110:93-8 https://doi.org/10.1001/archotol.1984.00800280027008
  21. Watson SP : Collagen receptor signaling in platelets and megakaryocytes. Thromb heamost 1999;82:365-76
  22. Chiang TM : Collagen-platelet interaction : platelet non-integrin receptors. Histiol Histopathol 1999;14:579-85
  23. Konishi J, Miyamoto T, Miura A, Osaki K : An investigation intothe wound healing action of the atelocollagen tooth extraction wound protection material(TRE-641) on tooth extraction site. J of Japanese Society for Biomaterials 1998;16:266-275
  24. Suarez-Cunqueiro MM, Gutwald R, Reichman J : Marginal flap versus paramarginal flap in impacted third molar surgery : A prospective study. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2003;95:403 https://doi.org/10.1067/moe.2003.84
  25. Schofield ID, Kogon SL, Donner A : Long-term comparison of two surgical flap designs for third molar surgery on the health of the periodontal tissue of the second molar tooth. J Can Dent Assoc 1988;54:689
  26. Quee TA, Gosselin D, Millar EP : Surgical removal of the fully impacted mandibular third molar. The influence of flap design and alveolar bone height on the periodontal status of the second molar. J Periodontol 1985;56:625 https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1985.56.10.625
  27. Tugrul Kirtiloglu, Emel Bulut, Mahmut Sumer, Inanc Cengiz : Comparison of 2 flap designs in the periodontal healing of second molars after fully impacted mandibular third molar extractions. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2007;65:2206-2210 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2006.11.029
  28. Stephens RJ, App GR, Foreman DW : Periodontal evaluation of two mucoperiosteal flaps used in removing impacted mandibular third molars. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1983;41:719 https://doi.org/10.1016/0278-2391(83)90188-X
  29. Rosa AL, Carneiro MG, Lavrador MA : Influence of flap design on periodontal healing of second molars after extraction of impacted mandibular third molars. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2002;93:404 https://doi.org/10.1067/moe.2002.122823
  30. Camargo PM, Lekovic V, Weinlaender M : Platelet-rich plasma and bovine porous bone mineral combined with guided tissue regeneration in the treatment of intrabony defects in humans. J Periodontal Res 2002;37:300 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0765.2002.01001.x
  31. Whitman DH, Berry RL, Green DM : Platelet gel : An autologous alternative to fibrin glue with applications in oral and macillofacial surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1997;55:1294 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0278-2391(97)90187-7
  32. Marx RE, Carlson ER, Eichstaedt RM : Platelet-rich plasma : Growth factor enhancement for bone grafts. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1998;85:638 https://doi.org/10.1016/S1079-2104(98)90029-4
  33. M. Geiger, R.H. Li, W. Friess : Collagen sponges for bone reeneration with rhBMP-2, Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews 2003;55:1613-1629 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addr.2003.08.010
  34. M. Chvapil : Collagen sponge: theory and practice of medical application, J biomed Master Res 2000;17(5):497-504
  35. M. Geiger, W Friess : Collagen sponge implants: application, characteristics and evaluation: Part I. Pharm Tech Europe 2002 February;14:48-56
  36. M. Geiger, W Friess : Collagen sponge implants : application, characteristics and evaluation: Part II. Pharm Tech Europe 2002 April;14:58-66
  37. Pieper JS, Oosterhof PJ, Dijkstra JH, van Kuppevelt TH : Preparation and characterization of porous crosslinked collagenous matrices containing bioavailable chondroitin sulphate. Biomaterials 1999;20:847-58 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-9612(98)00240-3
  38. Pohunkova H, Stehlik J, Vachal J, Cech O, Adam M. : Morphological features of bone healing under effect of collagengraft- glycosaminoglycan copolymer supplemented with the tripeptide Gly-His-Lys. Biomaterials 1996;17:1567-74 https://doi.org/10.1016/0142-9612(95)00310-X
  39. Toung JS, Ogle RC, Morgan RF, Lindsey WH : Repair of a rodent nasal critical size osseous defect with osteoblast augmented collagen gel. Laryngoscope 1999;109:1580-4 https://doi.org/10.1097/00005537-199910000-00006
  40. Radhika M, Sehgal PK : Studies on the desamidation of bovine collagen. J Biomed Mater Res 1997;35:497-503 https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(19970615)35:4<497::AID-JBM9>3.0.CO;2-C
  41. Nimni ME, Cheung D, Strates B, Kodama M, Sheikh K. : Chemically modified collagen : a natural biomaterial for tissue replacement. J Biomed Mater Res 1987;21:741-71 https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.820210606
  42. Radhika M, Babu M, Sehgal PK : Cellular proliferation on desaminated collagen matrices. Comp Biochem Physiol C Pharmacol Toxicol Endocrinol 1999;124:131-9 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-8413(99)00042-0
  43. Horton MA, Townsend P, Nesbitt S : Cell surface attachment molecules in bone. Academic Press 1996;217-23
  44. S.J. Prestrelski, G.M. Fox, T. Arakawa : Binding of heparin to basic fibroblast growth factor induces a conformational change. Arch Biochem Biophys 1992;293(2):314-319 https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-9861(92)90401-H
  45. S. Ye, Y. Luo, W. Lu, R.B. Jones, R.J. Linhardt, I. Capila, et al. : Structural basis for interaction of FGF-1, FGF-2 and FGF-7 with different heparin sulfate motifs. Biochemistry 2001;40(48) :14429-14439 https://doi.org/10.1021/bi011000u
  46. G. Venkataraman, R. Raman, V. Sasisekharan, R. Sasisekharan : Molecular characteristics of fibroblast growth factor-fibroblast growth factor receptor-heparin-like glycosaminoglycan complex. Poc Natl Acad Sci U.S.A. 1999;96(7):3658-3663 https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.96.7.3658