인터넷정보학회논문지 (Journal of Internet Computing and Services)

  • 제10권2호
  • /
  • Pages.143-151
  • /
  • 2009
  • /
  • 1598-0170(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2287-1136(eISSN)
한국인터넷정보학회 (Korean Society for Internet Information)
권호 표지

유무선 혼합 네트워크 환경에서 TCP 스킴의 성취도측정 평가

Measuring Achievement of TCP Schemes over Heterogeneous Wireless Networks

  • 이두형 (성균관대학교 정보통신연구실) ;
  • 배상태 (성균관대학교 정보통신연구실) ;
  • 구자환 (위스콘신 메디슨대학교 컴퓨터과) ;
  • 정진욱 (성균관대학교 정보통신공학부)
  • 발행 : 2009.04.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 논문에서는 유무선 혼합 네트워크상에서 TCP 스킴을 평가하기 위해 굿풋, 굿풋 인덱스, 정규화된 굿풋 인덱스 등을 정의하였다. 이러한 메트릭스들은 주로 TCP 스킴을 측정하기 위해 사용된 성능 메트릭스와는 달리 주어진 네트워크 상황에서 목적을 달성할 수 있는 능력인 성취도 개념을 포함하고 있다.

In this paper, we define Achieved Goodput(AG), Achieved Goodput Index(AGI) and Normalized Achieved Goodput Index(NAGI) in order to evaluate TCP schemes over heterogeneous wireless networks. These metrics contain a concept of achievement, the ability of accomplishing an objective in a given network situation unlike performance metrics commonly used to evaluate TCP schemes.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. M. Allman, V. Paxson, and W. Stevens, “TCP congestion control,” RFC 2581, 1981.
  2. R. Jain, “The art of computer systems performance analysis,” Wiley & Sons, 1991.
  3. S. Floyd and K. Fall, “Promoting the use of end-to-end congestion control in the Internet,” IEEE/ACM Trans. on Networking, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 458. 472, August 1999.
  4. http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-irtf-tmrg-metrics-11
  5. S. Floyd, M. Allman, A. Jain, and P. Sarolahti, Quick-Start for TCP and IP, RFC 4782, Experimental, January 2007.
  6. P. Sarolahti, M. Allman, and S. Floyd, Determining an Appropriate Sending Rate Over an Underutilized Network Path, Computer Networks, September 2006.
  7. F. Kelly, A. Maulloo and D. Tan, Rate Control in Communication Networks: Shadow Prices, Proportional Fairness and Stability. Journal of the Operational Research Society 49, pp. 237-252, 1998. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jors.2600523
  8. T. Friedman, R. Caceres, and A. Clark, RTP Control Protocol Extended Reports (RTCP XR), RFC 3611, November 2003.
  9. M. Allman, W. Eddy, and S. Ostermann, Estimating Loss Rates With TCP, ACM Performance Evaluation Review, 31(3), December 2003.
  10. E. Hahne and R. Gallager, Round Robin Scheduling for Fair Flow Control in Data Communications Networks, IEEE International Conference on Communications, June 1986.
  11. F. Kelly, A. Maulloo and D. Tan, Rate Control in Communication Networks: Shadow Prices, Proportional Fairness and Stability. Journal of the Operational Research Society 49, pp. 237-252, 1998. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jors.2600523
  12. R. Jain, D.M. Chiu, and W. Hawe, A Quantitative Measure of Fairness and Discrimination for Resource Allocation in Shared Systems, DEC TR-301, Littleton, MA: Digital Equipment
  13. K. Bharath-Kumar and J. Jeffrey, A New Approach to Performance-Oriented Flow Control, IEEE Transactions on Communications, Vol.29 N.4, April 1981.
  14. D. Mitra and J. Seery, Dynamic Adaptive Windows for High Speed Data Networks with Multiple Paths and Propagation Delays, INFOCOM '91, pp 39-48.
  15. S. Kunniyur and R. Srikant, End-to-end Congestion Control Schemes: Utility Functions, Random Losses and ECN Marks, IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking, 11(5):689-702, October 2003. https://doi.org/10.1109/TNET.2003.818183
  16. S. Floyd, Connections with Multiple Congested Gateways in Packet-Switched Networks Part 1: One-way Traffic, Computer Communication Review, Vol.21 No.5, October 1991, p. 30-47. https://doi.org/10.1145/122431.122434
  17. D. Katabi, M. Handley, and C. Rohrs, Congestion Control for High Bandwidth-Delay Product Networks, ACM Sigcomm, 2002.
  18. S. Floyd and V. Jacobson, On Traffic Phase Effects in Packet-Switched Gateways, Internetworking: Research and Experience, V.3 N.3, September 1992, p.115-156.
  19. Network Simulator NS-2: http://www.isi.edu/nsnam/ns