VALIDITY OF SUPERIMPOSITION RANGE AT 3-DIMENSIONAL FACIAL IMAGES

안면 입체영상 중첩시 중첩 기준 범위 설정에 따른 적합도 차이

  • Choi, Hak-Hee (Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Chonnam National University) ;
  • Cho, Jin-Hyoung (Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Chonnam National University) ;
  • Park, Hong-Ju (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Dental Science Research Institute, Chonnam National University) ;
  • Oh, Hee-Kyun (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Chonnam National University) ;
  • Choi, Jin-Hugh (Department of Dentistry, College of Medicine, Chung-Ang University) ;
  • Hwang, Hyeon-Shik (Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Chonnam National University) ;
  • Lee, Ki-Heon (Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Chonnam National University)
  • 최학희 (전남대학교 치의학전문대학원 교정학교실) ;
  • 조진형 (전남대학교 치의학전문대학원 교정학교실) ;
  • 박홍주 (전남대학교 치의학전문대학원 구강악안면외과학교실) ;
  • 오희균 (전남대학교 치의학전문대학원 구강악안면외과학교실) ;
  • 최진휴 (중앙대학교 의과대학 치과학교실) ;
  • 황현식 (전남대학교 치의학전문대학원 교정학교실) ;
  • 이기헌 (전남대학교 치의학전문대학원 교정학교실)
  • Published : 2009.03.31

Abstract

Purpose: This study was to evaluate the validity of superimposition range at facial images constructed with 3-dimensional (3D) surface laser scanning system. Materials and methods: For the present study, thirty adults, who had no severe skeletal discrepancy, were selected and scanned twice by a 3D laser scanner (VIVID 910, Minolta, Tokyo, Japan) with 12 markers placed on the face. Then, two 3D facial images (T1-baseline, T2-30 minutes later) were reconstructed respectably and superimposed in several manners with $RapidForm^{TM}2006$ (Inus, Seoul, Korea) software program. The distances between markers at the same place of face were measured in superimposed 3D facial images and measurement were done all the 12 makers respectably. Results: The average linear distances between the markers at the same place in the superimposed image constructed by upper 2/3 of the face was $0.92{\pm}0.23\;mm$, in the superimposed image constructed by upper 1/2 of the face was $0.98{\pm}0.26\;mm$, in the superimposed image constructed by upper 1/3 of the face and nose area was $0.99{\pm}0.24\;mm$, in the superimposed image constructed by upper 1/3 of the face was $1.41{\pm}0.48\;mm$, and in the superimposed image constructed by whole face was $0.83{\pm}0.13\;mm$. There were no statistically significant differences in the liner distances of the makers placed on the area included in superimposition range used for partial registration methods but there were significant differences in the linear distances of the markers placed on the areas not included in superimposition range between whole registration method and partial registration methods used in this study. Conclusion: The results of the present study suggest that the validity of superimposition is decreased as superimposition range is reduced in the superimposition of 3D images constructed with 3D laser scanner for the same subject.

Keywords

References

  1. Quintero JC, Trosien A, Hatcher D et al : Cranofacial imaging in orthodontics: Historical perspective, current status, and future development. Angle Orthod 69 : 491, 1999
  2. Mah J, Hatcher D : Current status and future needs in craniofacial imaging. Orthod Craniofac Res 6 : 10, 2003 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0544.2003.230.x
  3. Moss JP, Linney AD, Grindrod SR et al : Three-dimensional visualization of the face and skull using computerized tomography and laser scanning techniques. Eur J Orthod 9 : 247, 1987 https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/9.1.247
  4. Kusnoto B, Evans CA : Reliability of a 3D surface laser scanner for orthodontic applications. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 122 : 342, 2002 https://doi.org/10.1067/mod.2002.128219
  5. Kau CH, Richmond S, Zhurov AI et al : Reliablity of measuring facial morphology with a 3-dimensional laser scanning system. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 128 : 424, 2005 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2004.06.037
  6. Kau CH, Richmond S, Savio C et al : Measuring adult facial morphology in three dimensions. Angle Orthod 76 : 773, 2006
  7. Baik HS. Lee HJ, Jeon JM. A study of facial soft tissue of Korean adults with normal occlusion using a three-dimensional laser scanner. Korean J Orthod 36 : 1, 2006
  8. Moss JP, Linney AD, Lowey MN : The use of threedimensional techniques in facial esthetics. Semin Orthod 1 : 94, 1995 https://doi.org/10.1016/S1073-8746(95)80096-4
  9. Stewart A, McCance AM, James DR et al : Three-dimensional nasal changes following maxillary advancement in cleft patients. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 25 : 171, 1996 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0901-5027(96)80023-3
  10. McCance AM, Moss JP, Fright WR et al : Three-dimensional analysis techniques-Part 1: Three-dimensional softtissue analysis of 24 adult cleft palate patients following Le Fort I maxillary advancement: a preliminary report. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 34 : 36, 1997 https://doi.org/10.1597/1545-1569(1997)034<0036:TDATPT>2.3.CO;2
  11. Moss JP : The use of three-dimensional imaging in orthodontics. Eur J Orthod 28 : 416, 2006 https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjl025
  12. Kau CH, Zhurov A, Richmond S et al : Facial templates: a new perspective in three dimensions. Orthod Craniofac Res 9 : 10, 2006 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1601-6343.2006.00359.x
  13. Kau CH, Zhurov A, Richmond S et al : The 3-dimensional construction of the average 11-year-old child face: a clinical evaluation and application. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 64 : 1086, 2006 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2006.03.013
  14. Hennessy RJ, Moss JP : Facial growth: separating shape from size. Eur J Orthod 23 : 275, 2001 https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/23.3.275
  15. Kau CH, Zhurov A, Bibb R et al : The investigation of the changing facial appearance of identical twins employing a three-dimensional laser imaging system. Orthod Craniofac Res 8 : 85, 2005 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1601-6343.2005.00320.x
  16. McDonagh S, Moss JP, Goodwin P et al : A prospective optical surface scanning and cephalometric assessment of the effect of functional appliances on the soft tissues. Eur J Orthod 23 : 115, 2001 https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/23.2.115
  17. Ismail SF, Moss JP, Hennessy RJ : Three-dimensional assessment of the effects of extraction and non-extraction orthodontic treatment on the face. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 121 : 244, 2002 https://doi.org/10.1067/mod.2002.121010
  18. Moss JP, Ismail SF, Hennessy RJ : Three-dimensional assessment of treatment outcomes on the face. Orthod Craniofac Res 6 : 126, 2003 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0544.2003.245.x
  19. Coombes AM, Moss JP, Linney AD et al : A mathematical method for the comparison of three-dimensional changes in the facial surface. Eur J Orthod 13 : 95, 1991 https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/13.2.95
  20. McCance AM, Moss JP, Fright WR et al : A three dimensional analysis of soft and hard tissue changes following bimaxillary orthognathic surgery in skeletal III patients. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 30 : 305, 1992 https://doi.org/10.1016/0266-4356(92)90180-Q
  21. McCance AM, Moss JP, Wright WR et al : A three-dimensional soft tissue analysis of 16 skeletal class III patients following bimaxillary surgery. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 30 : 221, 1992 https://doi.org/10.1016/0266-4356(92)90264-J
  22. Moss JP, McCance AM, Fright WR et al : A three-dimensional soft tissue analysis of fifteen patients with Class II, Division 1 malocclusions after bimaxillary surgery. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 105 : 430, 1994 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-5406(94)70002-8
  23. McCance AM, Moss JP, Fright WR et al : Three-dimensional analysis techniques-Part 2: Laser scanning: a quantitative three-dimensional soft-tissue analysis using a color-coding system. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 34 : 46, 1997 https://doi.org/10.1597/1545-1569(1997)034<0046:TDATPL>2.3.CO;2
  24. Kau CH, Cronin A, Durning P et al : A new method for the 3D measurement of postoperative swelling following orthognathic surgery. Orthod Craniofac Res 9 : 31, 2006 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1601-6343.2006.00341.x
  25. McCance AM, Moss JP, Fright WR et al : Three-dimensional analysis techniques-Part 3: Color-coded system for three-dimensional measurement of bone and ratio of soft tissue to bone: the analysis. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 34 : 52, 1997 https://doi.org/10.1597/1545-1569(1997)034<0052:TDATPC>2.3.CO;2
  26. McCance AM, Moss JP, Fright WR et al : Three-dimensional analysis techniques-Part 4: Three-dimensional analysis of bone and soft tissue to bone ratio of movements in 24 cleft palate patients following Le Fort I osteotomy: a preliminary report. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 34 : 58, 1997 https://doi.org/10.1597/1545-1569(1997)034<0058:TDATPT>2.3.CO;2
  27. Ferrario VF, Sforza C, Schmitz JH et al : A three-dimensional computerized mesh diagram analysis and its application in soft tissue facial morphometry. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 114 : 404, 1998 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-5406(98)70185-4
  28. Ferrario VF, Sforza C, Poggio CE et al : Facial threedimensional morphometry. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 109 : 86, 1996 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-5406(96)70167-1
  29. Kim EH. Hwang HS. The validity of head posture aligner in posteroanterior cephaiometry. Korean J Orthod 30 : 543, 2000
  30. Hwang HS. Lee KH. Park JY et al. Development of posteroanterior cephalometric analysis for the diagnosis of facial asymmetry. J Kor Dent Assoc 42 : 219, 2004
  31. Soncul M, Bamber MA : The reproducibility of the head position for a laser scan using a novel morphometric analysis for orthognathic surgery. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 29 : 86, 2000 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0901-5027(00)80002-8
  32. Ter Haar FB, Cignoni P, Min P : A comparison of systems and tools for 3D scanning. In: 3D digital imaging and modeling: applications of heritage, industry, medicine and land. Padua: Italy; 2005
  33. Besel PJ, Mckay ND : A method for registration for 3-D shapes. IEEE Trans Patt Anal Machine Intell 14 : 239, 1992 https://doi.org/10.1109/34.121791
  34. INUS Technology. RapidformTM 2006 tutorial. Seoul: Korea; 20
  35. Okada E : Three-dimensional facial simulation and measurement: Changes of facial contour and units associated with facial expression. J Craniofac Surg 12 : 167, 2001 https://doi.org/10.1097/00001665-200103000-00014