CLINICAL STUDY ON USE OF BIODEGRADABLE PLATE AND SCREW IN ORTHOGNATHIC SURGERY

턱교정 수술에 있어 흡수성 고정판 및 나사 사용에 대한 임상적 연구

  • Park, Sung-Soo (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial surgery, College of Dentistry, Seoul National University) ;
  • Choi, Jin-Young (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial surgery, College of Dentistry, Seoul National University)
  • 박성수 (서울대학교 치과대학 구강악안면외과학교실) ;
  • 최진영 (서울대학교 치과대학 구강악안면외과학교실)
  • Published : 2009.03.31

Abstract

Objectives : The titanium fixation system has been used in orthognathic surgery for fixation of bone segments usually, but the biodegradable fixation system was developed and also being used. The strongest point in the biodegradable system is that no extra operation should be needed to remove fixation materials. In spite of this merit, oral & maxillofacial surgeons hesitate to use this system in fracture or orthognathic surgery. In this study, as we got some clinical experiences, we'd like to report the result of clinical study using the biodegradable fixation system in orthognathic surgery. Patients and Methods : A total of 35 patients composed of 17 males and 18 females with 25 osteotomies in maxilla and 34 osteotomies in mandible were fixated with the biodegradable fixation system(Inion $CPS^{(R)}$). We investigated methods of stabilization, fixation time, and complications on the basis of the method as above. Results : Four 2mm thick L shaped plates with 7 holes of which 1 hole was removed were fixed in maxilla with six $2.0{\times}7mm$ screws. Three $2.5{\times}16{\sim}18mm$ screws were used to fix superior ramus area and one mandibular angle area in mandible. It took about 27.4 minutes in maxilla, 25.3 minutes in mandible to perform the fixation which took longer time than the titanium system(9.5 minutes in maxilla, 8 minutes in mandible). Generally, there was no problem except 9 cases in which there were some complications. Conclusions : In most cases, the biodegradable fixation system can be used without problem in usual orthognathic surgery. But, this system is inferior to the titanium fixation one in some respects such as fixation time, size, and physical property. Some supplementations for such weak points as aforementioned should be needed for the universal use of biodegradable materials.

Keywords

References

  1. Cheung LK, Chow LK, Chiu WK : A randomized controlled trial of resorbable versus titanium fixation for orthognathic surgery. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 98 : 386, 2004 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2004.02.069
  2. Turvey TA, Bell B, Tejera TJ et al : The use of self-reinforced biodegradable bone plates and screws in orthognathic surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 60 : 59, 2002 https://doi.org/10.1053/joms.2002.28274
  3. Laine P, Kontio R, Lindqvist C et al : Are there any complications with bioabsorbable fixation devices? A 10 year review in orthognathic surgery. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 33 : 240, 2004 https://doi.org/10.1006/ijom.2003.0510
  4. Fedorowicz Z, Nasser M, Newton JT et al : Resorbable versus titanium plates for orthognathic surgery. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 18 : CD006204, 2007 https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD006204
  5. Ahmad N, Lyles J, Panchal J : Outcomes and complications based on experience with resorbable plates in pediatric Craniosynostosis patients. J Craniofac Surg 19 : 855, 2008 https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0b013e31816ae358
  6. Landes CA : Skeletal stability in bimaxillary orthognathic surgery : P(L/DL)LA-resorbable versus titanium osteofixation. Plast Reconstr Surg 118 : 703, 2006 https://doi.org/10.1097/01.prs.0000232985.05153.bf
  7. Edwards RC, Kiely KD, Eppley BL : The fate of resorbable poly-L-lactic/polyglycolic acid(LactoSorb) bone fixation devices in orthognathic surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 59 : 19, 2001 https://doi.org/10.1053/joms.2001.19267
  8. Shand JM, Heggie AAC : Use of a resorbable fixation system in orthognathic surgery. British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 38 : 335, 2000 https://doi.org/10.1054/bjom.1999.0287
  9. Eppley BL : Bioabsorbable plate and screw fixation in orthognathic surgery. J Craniofac Surg 18 : 818, 2007 https://doi.org/10.1097/scs.0b013e3180684933
  10. Eckelt U, Nitsche M, Mu¨ller A et al : Ultrasound aided pin fixation of biodegradable osteosynthetic materials in cranioplasty for infants with craniosynostosis. Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery 35 : 218, 2007 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcms.2007.04.005
  11. Spanio S, Ashammakhi N, Ilom¨a ki J et al : Use of new bioabsorbable tacks and a tackshooter in cranial bone osteofixation saves operative time. J Craniofac Surg 13 : 693, 2002 https://doi.org/10.1097/00001665-200209000-00018
  12. Eppley BL, Sarver D, Pietrzak B : Biomechanical testing of resorbable screws used for mandibular sagittal split osteotomies. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 57 : 1431, 1999 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0278-2391(99)90726-7
  13. Buijs GJ, Houwen EB, Stegenga B et al : Mechanical strength and stiffness of biodegradable and titanium osteofixation systems. J Oral Maillofac Surg 65 : 2148, 2007 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2007.04.010