Microtubule Assemblies and Methylation Patterns of Porcine IVF and Parthenogenetic Embryos

돼지 체외수정란 및 단위발생란의 미세관 형성 및 메틸화 양상

  • Park, Joo-Hee (School of Veterinary Medicine, Kangwon National University) ;
  • Kim, Ho-Jeong (School of Veterinary Medicine, Kangwon National University) ;
  • Lee, Beom-Ki (School of Veterinary Medicine, Kangwon National University) ;
  • Kwon, Dae-Jin (School of Veterinary Medicine, Kangwon National University) ;
  • Hwang, In-Sun (College of Animal Life Science, Kangwon National University) ;
  • Park, Choon-Keun (College of Animal Life Science, Kangwon National University) ;
  • Yang, Boo-Keun (College of Animal Life Science, Kangwon National University) ;
  • Cheong, Hee-Tae (School of Veterinary Medicine, Kangwon National University)
  • 박주희 (강원대학교 수의학부대학) ;
  • 김호정 (강원대학교 수의학부대학) ;
  • 이범기 (강원대학교 수의학부대학) ;
  • 권대진 (강원대학교 수의학부대학) ;
  • 황인선 (강원대학교 동물생명과학대학) ;
  • 박춘근 (강원대학교 동물생명과학대학) ;
  • 양부근 (강원대학교 동물생명과학대학) ;
  • 정희태 (강원대학교 수의학부대학)
  • Published : 2009.03.31

Abstract

This study was performed to confirm the microtubule assemblies and methylation patterns of porcine IVF and parthenogenetic embryos. Cumulus-oocyte complexes were collected and matured in vitro for 42 hr. Oocytes were fertilized by prepared fresh sperm or activated parthenogenetically by exposure to electric stimulation and 6-dimethylaminopurine. Porcine IVF and parthenogenetic embryos were cultured in vitro for 6 days. Embryos were stained by immunofluorescence staining method to observe the dynamic of nucleus and microtubules in the first mitotic phase and the methylation patterns in different developmental stages. After then, samples were confirmed and analyzed through a laser-scanning confocal microscope. IVF embryos had a centrosome originated from sperms, which was shown a $\gamma$-tubulin spot. However, $\gamma$-tubulin spot was not observed in parthenogenetic embryos. A lower methylation level was observed in IVF embryos compared to parthenogenetic ones at the morula and blastocyst stages. In conclusion, it is considered that microtubule assemblies and genetic regulation mechanism differ between parthenogenetic and IVF embryos.

Keywords

References

  1. Beaujean N, Taylor J, Gardner J, Wilmut I, Meehan R, Young L (2004): Effect of limited DNA methylation reprogramming in the normal sheep embryo on somatic cell nuclear transfer. Biol Reprod 71:185-193 https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod.103.026559
  2. Carlson LL, Page AW, Bestor TH (1992): Localisation and properties of DNA methyltransferase in preimplantation mouse embryos: Implications for genomic imprinting. Genes Dev 6:2536-2541 https://doi.org/10.1101/gad.6.12b.2536
  3. Dean W, Santos F, Stojkovic M, Zakhartchenko V, Walter J, Wolf E, Reik W (2001): Conservation of methylation reprogramming in mammalian development: aberrant reprogramming in cloned embryos. Proc Natl Acad Sci 98:13734-13738 https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.241522698
  4. Gould RR, Borisy GG (1977): The pericentriolar material in Chinese hamster ovary cells nucleates microtubule formation. J Cell Biol 73:601-615 https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.73.3.601
  5. Holy J, Schatten G (1997): Recruitment of maternal material during assembly of the zygote centrosome in fertilized sea urchin eggs. Cell Tissue Res 289:285-297 https://doi.org/10.1007/s004410050875
  6. Howlett SK, Reik W (1991): Methylation levels of maternal and paternal genomes during preimplantation development. Development 113:119-127
  7. Kim NH, Simerly C, Funahashi H, Schatten G, Day BN (1996): Microtubule organization in porcine oocytes during fertilization and parthenogenesis. Biol Reprod 54:1397-1404 https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod54.6.1397
  8. Kwon DJ, Park CK, Yang BK, Cheong HT (2008): Control of nuclear remodelling and subsequent in vitro development and methylation status of porcine nuclear transfer embryos. Reproduction 135:649-656 https://doi.org/10.1530/REP-06-0387
  9. Latham KE, Rambhatla L, Hayashizaki Y, Chapman VM (1995): Stage-specific induction and regulation by genomic imprinting of the mouse U2afbp-rs gene during preimplantation development. Dev Biol 168:670- 676 https://doi.org/10.1006/dbio.1995.1111
  10. Le Guen P, Crozet N (1989): Microtubule and centrosome distribution during sheep fertilization. Eur J Cell Biol 48:239-249
  11. Lewis A, Mitsuya K, Umlauf D, Smith D, Dean W, Walter J, Higgins M, Feil R, Reik W (2004): Imprinting on distal chromosome 7 in the placenta involves repressive histone methylation independent of DNA methylation. Nat Genet 36:1291-1295 https://doi.org/10.1038/ng1468
  12. Long CR, Pinto-Correia C, Duby RT, Ponce De Leon FA, Boland MP, Roche JF, Robl JM (1993): Chromatin and microtubule morphology during the first cell cycle in bovine zygotes. Mol Reprod Dev 36:23-32 https://doi.org/10.1002/mrd.1080360105
  13. Monk M, Adams RL, Rinaldi A (1991): Decrease in DNA methylase activity during preimplantation development in the mouse. Development 112:189-192
  14. Reik W, Walter J (2001): Genomic imprinting: Parental influence on the genome. Nat Rev Genet 2:21-32 https://doi.org/10.1038/35047554
  15. Rougier N, Bourchis D, Gomes DM, Niveleau A, Plachot M, Paldi A, Viegas-Pequignot E (1998): Chromosome methylation patterns during mammalian preimplantation development. Genes Dev 12:2108- 2113 https://doi.org/10.1101/gad.12.14.2108
  16. Santos F, Hendrich B, Reik W, Dean W (2002): Dynamic reprogramming of DNA methylation in the early mouse embryo. Dev Biol 241:172-182 https://doi.org/10.1006/dbio.2001.0501
  17. Schatten H, Walter M, Biessmann H, Schatten G (1992): Activation of maternal centrosomes in unfertilized sea urchin eggs. Cell Motil Cytoskeleton 23: 61-70 https://doi.org/10.1002/cm.970230107
  18. Schuh M, Ellenberg J (2007): Self-organization of MTOCs replaces centrosome function during a centrosomal spindle assembly in live mouse oocytes. Cell 130:484-498 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2007.06.025
  19. Shi W, Dirim F, Wolf E, Zakhartchenko V, Haaf T (2004): Methylation reprogramming and chromosomal aneuploidy in in vivo fertilized and cloned rabbit preimplantation embryos. Biol Reprod 71:340-347 https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod.103.024554
  20. Stearns T, Evans L, Kirschner M (1991): $\Upsilon$-Tubulin is a highly conserved component of the centrosome. Cell 65:825-836 https://doi.org/10.1016/0092-8674(91)90390-K
  21. Surani MA (1998): Imprinting and the initiation of gene silencing in the germ-line. Cell 93:309-312 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81156-3
  22. Surani MA, Barton SC, Norris ML (1984): Development of reconstituted mouse eggs suggests imprinting of the genome during gametogenesis. Nature 308: 548-550 https://doi.org/10.1038/308548a0
  23. Yoshioka K, Suzuki C, Tanaka I, Anas IMK, Iwamura S (2002): Birth of piglets derived from porcine zygotes cultured in a chemically defined medium. Biol Reprod 66:112-119 https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod66.1.112