DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

가정배달 노인급식 수혜자의 위생지식 및 가정에서의 위생관리 습관

Food Safety Knowledge and Home Food Safety Practices of Home-delivered Meal Service Recipients

  • 이경은 (서울여자대학교 식품영양학) ;
  • 이나영 (연세대학교 식품영양과학연구소) ;
  • 박정연 (연세대학교 식품영양과학연구소)
  • Lee, Kyung-Eun (Dept. of Food & Nutrition, Seoul Women's University) ;
  • Yi, Na-Young (Research Institute of Food & Nutritional Sciences, Yonsei University) ;
  • Park, Jung-Yeon (Research Institute of Food & Nutritional Sciences, Yonsei University)
  • 발행 : 2009.05.29

초록

본 연구의 목적은 가정배달 노인급식 수혜자의 위생지식수준과 가정에서의 위생관리 수행도를 조사하는 것으로 서울지역에서 가정배달 노인급식서비스를 제공하는 노인복지관과 종합사회복지관 2곳을 선정하고 수혜자를 무작위로 선정하여 설문조사를 실시하였다. 총 120명을 선정하였고 조사에 참여한 97명의 응답을 자료 분석에 이용하였다. 응답자의 대부분은 여성이었고, 70세 이상이었으며, 초등학교 졸업이하의 학력을 보였다. 절반가량이 혼자 살고 있었고, 여러가지 만성질환으로 약을 복용하고 있었으며 스스로도 자신의 건강을 좋지 않게 인식하고 있었다. 위생지식 평가 결과 손 씻기의 필요성은 인식하고 있었으나 그 구체적인 방법에 대한 지식은 부족하였고, 가열처리 없이 섭취하는 과일의 세척, 소독 방법, 남은 음식의 보관 방법, 행주의 사용에 대한 지식수준이 낮게 나타났다. 배달급식을 받는 노인들의 가정 내에서 위생관리 수행도 평균 점수는 2.8점으로 높지 않았다. 남은 음식의 완전한 재가열, 유통기한 준수가 가장 잘 수행되고 있는 반면, 손 상처의 부적절한 처리, 행주와 도마의 관리, 달걀 등 오염도가 높은 식품 취급 후 손 씻기가 잘 수행되고 있지 않았다. 급식 수혜노인의 위생지식과 식품 취급습관은 일부를 제외하고는 일반 사항에 따른 유의적인 차이가 없었다. 위생지식 총점과 수행도 평균은 유의적인 양의 상관관계를 보였고(p<0.01), 세부 영역별로는 구분사용과 세척 및 소독 위생지식이 관련 수행도와 유의적인 양의 상관관계를 보였다(p<0.01). 독거노인과 노인가정이 증가하면서 가정에서 노인들의 식품취급은 증가할 것이고, 외부에서 조리된 음식을 가정에서 섭취할 경우에도 섭취 전까지 보관이 식품의 안전성 확보에 중요하므로 노인들을 대상으로 하는 위생교육 프로그램의 개발에 본 연구 결과가 이용될 수 있을 것이다. 보다 효과적인 위생교육 프로그램의 개발을 위해서는 위생교육을 통해 습득된 위생지식이 실생활에서 실천되는 과정에 영향을 미칠 수 있는 요인들에 대한 연구 역시 지속되어야 할 것이다.

The purposes of this study were to evaluate food safety knowledge and to assess home food safety performance of home-delivered meal service recipients. Two facilities providing home-delivered meal services for older adults were located in Seoul. A total of 120 service recipients were surveyed using an individual interview technique and 97 responses were used for data analysis. A statistical data analysis was completed using SPSS program (ver.14) for descriptive analysis, t-test, ANOVA, and correlation analysis. The majority of the participants were 70 years old or older and females. They perceived their health status as poor or very poor and took more than one kind of medicines. An average score of the food safety knowledge test was 11.48 based on 18 points (63.8%). The results revealed that the older adults knew the importance of hand washing but were not aware of when and how to wash hands. There was room to improve knowledge on cleaning and sanitizing fresh fruits and using wiping cloth. The knowledge score for each category was not significantly different by gender and age. The home food safety practices of the older adults was rated as 2.8 out of 4 points; the highest score was associated for proper food handling category and the lowest score was for cleaning and sanitizing. The worst performance was related to managing hand cuts and wounds (1.96). The total knowledge score and an average performance score were significantly correlated (p<0.01). Food safety education programs targeting the older adults who receive home-delivered meal services would improve the recipients' food safety knowledge and practices related to consumption of the meals at home. The programs should focus on not only improving food safety knowledge but also changing food safety practices.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Korean National Statistical Office. 2007. 2007 Older population statistics. Available at http://www.nso.go.kr. Accessed April 3, 2009
  2. Jung HY, Yang IS, Lee HY, Chae IS. 2003. Analyzing the current congregate meal service program for homebound elderly. Korea J Comm Nutr 8: 919-926
  3. Ministry of Health and Welfare. 2006. 2006 Public welfare service for older population. Ministry of Health and Welfare
  4. Chae IS, Yang IS, Lee HY, Park MK. 2000. Evaluation of home-delivered meals service program for home-bound elderly with low income class. J Korean Diet Assoc 6: 57-70
  5. Administration on Aging. 2004. Evaluation report III: Contribution of the Title III nutrition programs to participants' 24-hour dietary intake and social contacts. Available at www.aoa.gov/prof/aoaprog/nutrition/program_eval/er_vol1ch3.asp. Accessed Feb 25, 2007
  6. McCabe-Sellers BJ, Beattie SE. 2004. Food safety: Emerging trends in foodborne illness surveillance and prevention. J Am Diet Assoc 104: 1708-1717 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jada.2004.08.028
  7. Mounts AW, Holman RC, Clarke MJ, Bresee JS, Glass RI. 1999. Trends in hospitalizations associated with gastroenteritis among adults in the United States, 1979-1995. Epidemiol Infect 123: 1-8 https://doi.org/10.1017/S0950268899002587
  8. Altekruse SF, Street DA, Fein SB, Levy AS. 1996. Consumer knowledge of foodborne microbial hazards and food-handling practices. J Food Prot 59: 287-294 https://doi.org/10.4315/0362-028X-59.3.287
  9. Bryan FL. 1988. Risks of practices, procedures and processes that lead to outbreaks of foodborne diseases. J Food Prot 51: 663-673 https://doi.org/10.4315/0362-028X-51.8.663
  10. Knabel SJ. 1995. Foodborne illness: Role of home food handling practices. Food Technol 49: 119-131
  11. Prier R, Solnick JV. 2000. Foodborne and waterborne in fectious diseases. Postgraduate Med 107: 245-252 https://doi.org/10.3810/pgm.2000.04.1006
  12. Lee KE, Park JY, Y NY, You CH. 2009. Hazard analysis during transportation-consumption of home-delivered meal service for older adults and assessment of food safety knowledge of service providers and recipients. Unpublished Report. Seoul Women's University, Seoul. p 39-43
  13. Fey-Yensan N, English C, Ash S, Wallace C, Museler H. 2001. Food safety risk identified in a population of elderly home-delivered meal participants. J Am Diet Assoc 101: 1055-1057 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-8223(01)00259-0
  14. Almanza BA, Namkung Y, Ismail JA, Nelson DC. 2007. Clients' safe food-handling knowledge and risk behavior in a home-delivered meal program. J Am Diet Assoc 107: 816-821 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jada.2007.02.043
  15. Asp E, Darling M. 1988. Home-delivered meals: Food quality, nutrient content, and characteristics of recipients. J Am Diet Assoc 88: 55-59
  16. Fogler-Levitt E, Lau D, Csima A, Krondl M, Coleman P. 1995. Utilization of home-delivered meals by recipients 75 years of age or older. J Am Diet Assoc 95: 552-557 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-8223(95)00150-6
  17. Lau D, Coleman P, Krondl M. 1994. Delayed consumption patterns of home-delivered meals by elderly recipients 75+ years. J Am Diet Assoc 94: A-61 https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-8223(94)91801-5
  18. Gettings MA, Kiernan NE. 2001. Practices and perceptions of food safety among seniors who prepare meals at home. J Nutr Educ 33: 148-154 https://doi.org/10.1016/S1499-4046(06)60184-X
  19. Hanson JA, Benedict JA. 2002. Use of the Health Belief Model to examine older adults' food-handling behaviors. J Nutr Educ Behav 34: S25-30 https://doi.org/10.1016/S1499-4046(06)60308-4
  20. Nam HW, Lee YM, Myung CO, Lee KW, Park YS. 2000. Satisfaction of the elderly toward free congregate meal service. Korea J Comm Nutr 5: 74-82
  21. Park JU, Han KH, Choi ME, Chung SD, Chai IS. 2001. Characteristics of the organizational structure of free meal service centers and cooperation with community. Korean J Comm Nutr 6: 553-564
  22. Suh HJ, Hong M, Jang Y, Kim B, Lee H, Kim CI. 2003. Satisfaction measurement and needs analysis of the beneficiaries of the elderly meal service program. J Korean Diet Assoc 9: 114-127
  23. Yang IS, Jung HY, Lee HY, Chae IS. 2003. Analyzing the current practice of the home-delivered meal (HDM) service program for homebound elderly. Korea J Comm Nutr 8: 736-743
  24. Chang HJ. 2008. Strategies for the improvement of customer satisfaction on foodservice through identifying the foodservice quality factors in senior care facilities. Korea J Comm Nutr 13: 69-79
  25. Lee YH, Cho KD, Lee BH. 2006. Hygienic practice attitude of housewives in Seoul and related factors. Korean J Food Cookery Sci 22: 229-236
  26. Medeiros LC, Hillers VN, Chen G, Bergmann V, Kendall P. 2004. Design and development of food safety knowledge and attitude scale for consumer food safety education. J Am Diet Assoc 104: 1671-1677 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jada.2004.08.030
  27. Yoon K, Yoon H, Koo S. 2005. Study on handling practice and consumption of potentially risky foods in family home. J Fd Hyg Safety 20: 147-158
  28. US Food and Drug Administration. 2009. Recalls, market withdrawals and safety alerts. Available at: www.fda.gov. Accessed Mar 30, 2008
  29. Kendall P, Medeiros LC, Hillers V, Chen G, MiMascola S. 2003. Food handling behaviors of special importance for pregnant women, infants, and young children, the elderly, and immune-compromised people. J Am Diet Assoc 103: 1646-1649 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jada.2003.09.027
  30. Kim WJ, Choi EH. 2002. Food safety knowledge and behaviors of housewives in Chungbuk province areas. J Human Ecology 5: 1-13
  31. Salmonella Enteritidis Risk Assessment Team. Food Safety and Inspection Services. 1998. Risk assessment of Salmonella Enterititis. Available at: www.fsis.usda.gov/ophs/risk/index.htm. Accessed April 3, 2009
  32. Park YS. 2000. Evaluation of hygienic status of university foodservice operation using ATP bioluminescence assay. Korean J Soc Food Sci 16: 195-201
  33. Kim EJ. 2005. Analysis of microbiological hazards and quantitative microbial risk assessment of Staphylococcus aureus inoculated onto potentially hazardous foods in school foodservice operations. MS Thesis. Yonsei University, Seoul. p 98-99
  34. Yang S, Leff MG, McTague D. 1998. Multitstate surveillance of food handling, preparation, and consumption behaviros associated with foodborne diseases: 1995 and 1996 BRFSS food-safety questions. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 47: 33-57
  35. Worsfold D, Griffith C. 1997. Food safety behavior in the home. British Food J 99: 97-104 https://doi.org/10.1108/00070709710168932

피인용 문헌

  1. Florida, USA Food-Related Lifestyle Segments of Older Consumers in Seoul and Its Characteristics vol.39, pp.1, 2010, https://doi.org/10.3746/jkfn.2010.39.1.146
  2. A Qualitative Study on Needs of Convenience Meal from the Low-income Female Elderly vol.29, pp.2, 2014, https://doi.org/10.7318/KJFC/2014.29.2.163
  3. Investigation of Food Safety Knowledge, Attitudes, and Behavior for Analyzing Food Safety Risk Factors in the Elderly vol.45, pp.5, 2016, https://doi.org/10.3746/jkfn.2016.45.5.746
  4. Food Safety and Nutrition Education Program for Elderly and Assessment of Program Effectiveness Based on Health Belief Model vol.45, pp.9, 2016, https://doi.org/10.3746/jkfn.2016.45.9.1366
  5. Seniors, and their food handlers and caregivers, need food safety and nutrition education vol.68, pp.1, 2014, https://doi.org/10.3733/ca.v068n01p30
  6. Antioxidative Activities of Extracts from Dried Citrus sunki and C. unshiu Peels vol.39, pp.1, 2010, https://doi.org/10.3746/jkfn.2010.39.1.001
  7. Concerns for Food Safety and the HACCP of College Students in Daejeon vol.20, pp.3, 2011, https://doi.org/10.5934/KJHE.2011.20.3.665
  8. Qualitative study on home delivery meal services for the elderly vol.46, pp.6, 2013, https://doi.org/10.4163/jnh.2013.46.6.589
  9. Antioxidant Effects of Viscum album L. Extracts by Extraction Conditions vol.39, pp.1, 2010, https://doi.org/10.3746/jkfn.2010.39.1.014
  10. Development of the evaluation tool for the food safety and nutrition management education projects targeting the middle class elderly: Application of the balanced score card and the structure-process-outcome concept vol.48, pp.6, 2015, https://doi.org/10.4163/jnh.2015.48.6.542
  11. 50인 미만 노인복지시설의 급식 현황 및 급식업무 종사자들의 위생지식 및 실천도 평가 vol.17, pp.3, 2011, https://doi.org/10.14373/jkda.2011.17.3.287
  12. 가정배달급식 수혜 노인의 영양위험도와 영양위험도에 미치는 요인 vol.24, pp.3, 2009, https://doi.org/10.5720/kjcn.2019.24.3.197
  13. 농촌 고령자 대상 농한기 마을 공동식사 프로그램 참여 조리자원봉사자의 프로그램 운영에 대한 인식과 과정 평가 vol.24, pp.4, 2009, https://doi.org/10.5720/kjcn.2019.24.4.277
  14. Effects of Personal Hygiene Habits on Self-Efficacy for Preventing Infection, Infection-Preventing Hygiene Behaviors, and Product-Purchasing Behaviors vol.13, pp.17, 2009, https://doi.org/10.3390/su13179483