Geomechanics and Engineering

Techno-Press (테크노프레스)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Applications of artificial intelligence and data mining techniques in soil modeling

  • Javadi, A.A. (Computational Geomechanics Group, School of Engineering, Computing and Mathematics, University of Exeter) ;
  • Rezania, M. (Computational Geomechanics Group, School of Engineering, Computing and Mathematics, University of Exeter)
  • Received : 2008.10.21
  • Accepted : 2009.01.15
  • Published : 2009.03.25
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

In recent years, several computer-aided pattern recognition and data mining techniques have been developed for modeling of soil behavior. The main idea behind a pattern recognition system is that it learns adaptively from experience and is able to provide predictions for new cases. Artificial neural networks are the most widely used pattern recognition methods that have been utilized to model soil behavior. Recently, the authors have pioneered the application of genetic programming (GP) and evolutionary polynomial regression (EPR) techniques for modeling of soils and a number of other geotechnical applications. The paper reviews applications of pattern recognition and data mining systems in geotechnical engineering with particular reference to constitutive modeling of soils. It covers applications of artificial neural network, genetic programming and evolutionary programming approaches for soil modeling. It is suggested that these systems could be developed as efficient tools for modeling of soils and analysis of geotechnical engineering problems, especially for cases where the behavior is too complex and conventional models are unable to effectively describe various aspects of the behavior. It is also recognized that these techniques are complementary to conventional soil models rather than a substitute to them.

Keywords

References

  1. Abu-Kiefa, M.A. (1998), "General regression neural networks for driven piles in cohesionless soils", J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., ASCE, 124(12), 1177-1185. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(1998)124:12(1177)
  2. Amorosi, A., Millar, D.L. and Rampello, S. (1996), "On the Use of Artificial Neural Networks as Generic Descriptors of Geomaterial Mechanical Behavior", Proceeding of the International Symposium on Prediction and Performance in Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, EUROCK '96, Torino, Italy, 161-168.
  3. Banimahd, M., Yasrobi, S.S. and Woodward, P.K. (2005), "Artificial neural network for stress-strain behavior of sandy soils: Knowledge based verification", Comput. Geotech., 32(5), 377-386. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2005.06.002
  4. Benardos, A.G. and Kaliampakos, D.C. (2004), "Modeling TBM performance with artificial neural networks", J. Tunneling Underground Space Technology, 19(6), 597-605. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2004.02.128
  5. Caudill, M. (1991), "Neural network training tips and techniques", AI Expert, 6(1), 56-61.
  6. Dayhoff, J.E. (1990), Neural Network Architectures: An Introduction, Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York.
  7. Desai, C.S. and Siriwardane, H.J. (1984), Constitutive Laws for Engineering Materials with Emphasis on Geological Materials, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
  8. Desai, C.S., Somasundaram, S. and Frantziskonis, G. (1986), "A Hierarchical Approach for Constitutive Modeling of Geologic Materials", Int. J. Numer. Anal. Met. Geomech., 10(3), 225-257. https://doi.org/10.1002/nag.1610100302
  9. Doglioni, A. (2004), "A novel hybrid evolutionary technique for environmental hydraulic modeling", Ph.D. dissertation, Technical University of Bari, Italy.
  10. Doglioni, A., Giustolisi, O., Savic, D.A. and Webb, B.W. (2008), "An investigation on stream temperature analysis based on evolutionary computing", Hydrol. Process, 22(3) 315-326.
  11. Drakos, S., Shin, H.S. and Pande, G.N. (2006), "Finite elements with artificial intelligence", Proceeding of the 2nd International Congress on Computational Mechanics and Simulation, Guwahati, India, Paper No. 297.
  12. Duncan, J.M. and Chang, C.Y. (1970), "Non-linear analysis of stress and strain in soils", J. Soil Mech. Found. Division, ASCE, 96(SM5), 1629-1653.
  13. Einstein, H.H. and Hirschfeld, R.C. (1973), "Model studies on mechanics of jointed rock", J. Soil Mech. Found. Division, ASCE, 99(SM3), 229-248.
  14. Ellis, G., Yao, C. and Zhao, R. (1992), "Neural network modeling of mechanical behavior of sand", Proceedings of the 9th ASCE Conference on Engineering Mechanics, Texas, 421-424.
  15. Ellis, G.W., Yao, C., Zhao, R. and Penumadu, D. (1995), "Stress-Strain Modeling of Sands using Artificial Neural Netwoks", J. Geotech. Eng. Division, ASCE, 121(5), 429-435. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1995)121:5(429)
  16. Elman, J.L. (1990), "Finding structure in time", Cognitive Science, 14, 179-211. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog1402_1
  17. Flood, I. and Kartam, N. (1994). "Neural networks in civil engineering II principles and understanding", J. Comput. Civil. Eng., ASCE, 8(2), 149-162. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3801(1994)8:2(149)
  18. Garrett, J.H. (1994). "Where and why artificial neural networks are applicable in civil engineering", J. Comput. Civil. Eng., ASCE, 8(2), 129-130. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3801(1994)8:2(129)
  19. Ghaboussi, J. and Wilson, E.L. (1973), "Flow of compressible fluid in porous elastic media", Int. J. Numer. Met. Eng., 5, 419-442. https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.1620050311
  20. Ghaboussi, J., Carret, J. and Wu, X. (1990), "Material modeling with neural networks", Proceedings of the international conference on numerical methods in engineering: theory and applications, Swansea, UK, 701-717.
  21. Ghaboussi, J., Carret, J. and Wu, X. (1991), "Knowledge-based modeling of material behavior with neural networks", J. Eng. Mech. Division, 117(1), 132-153. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1991)117:1(132)
  22. Ghaboussi, J., Lade, P.V. and Sidarta, D.E. (1994), "Neural network based modeling in geomechanics", Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Computer Methods and Advances in Geomechanics, Morgantown, WV, 153-164.
  23. Ghaboussi, J., Pecknold, D.A., Zhang, M. and Haj-Ali, R.M. (1998), "Autoprogressive training of neural network constitutive models", Int. J. Numer. Met. Eng., 42(1), 105-126. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0207(19980515)42:1<105::AID-NME356>3.0.CO;2-V
  24. Ghaboussi, J. and Sidarta, D.E. (1998), "New nested adaptive neural networks (NANN) for constitutive modeling", Comput. and Geotech., 22(1), 29-52. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0266-352X(97)00034-7
  25. Giustolisi, O. (2002). "Some techniques to avoid overfitting of artificial neural networks", Proceeding of the 5th International Conference of Hydroinformatics, Cardiff, UK, 1465-1477.
  26. Giustolisi, O. and Savic, D.A. (2006), "A symbolic data-driven technique based on evolutionary polynomial regression", J. Hydroinform., 8(3), 207-222.
  27. Giustolisi, O., Doglioni, A., Savic, D.A. and Webb, B.W. (2007), "A multi-model approach to analysis of environmental phenomena", Environ. Model. Softw., 22(5), 674-682. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2005.12.026
  28. Giustolisi, O. and Simeone, V. (2006), Optimal design of artificial neural networks by a multi-objective strategy: groundwater level predictions. Hydrol. Sci. J., 51(3), 502-523. https://doi.org/10.1623/hysj.51.3.502
  29. Goh, A.T.C. (1996), "Pile driving records reanalyzed using neural networks", J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., ASCE, 122(6), 492-495. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1996)122:6(492)
  30. Habibagahi, G. and Bamdad, A. (2003), "A neural network framework for mechanical behavior of unsaturated soils", Can. Geotech. J., 40(3), 684-693. https://doi.org/10.1139/t03-004
  31. Haj-Ali, R.M., Pecknold, D.A., Ghaboussi, J. and Voyiadjis, G.Z. (2001), "Simulated micromechanical models using artificial neural networks", J. Eng. Mech., 127(7), 730-738. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2001)127:7(730)
  32. Hashash, Y.M.A., Jung, S. and Ghaboussi, J. (2004), "Numerical implementation of a neural network based material model in finite element analysis", Int. J. Numer. Met. Eng., 59, 989-1005. https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.905
  33. Javadi, A.A. (2006), "Prediction of air losses in compressed air tunneling using neural network", J. Tunneling Underground Space Technology, 21, 9-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2005.04.007
  34. Javadi, A.A. and Rezania, M. (2006), "A new genetic programming-based evolutionary approach for constitutive modeling of soils". Proceeding of the 7th World Congress on Computational Mechanics, Los Angeles, California, USA.
  35. Javadi, A.A. and Rezania, M. (2008a), "A new approach to data-driven modeling in geotechnical engineering", Int. J. Geomech. Geoeng., (Under Review).
  36. Javadi, A.A. and Rezania, M. (2008b), A New Approach to Constitutive Modeling of Soils in Finite Element Analysis using Evolutionary Computation. Proceedings of the Intelligent Computing in Engineering - ICE08 Conference, 2-4 July, Plymouth, UK.
  37. Javadi, A.A., Rezania, M. and Nezhad, M.M. (2007), "A new approach to data-driven modeling in civil engineering", Proceeding of the 1st International Conference on Digital Communications and Computer Applications, Amman, Jordan, 19-22 March, 2007, 17-24.
  38. Javadi, A. A., Rezania, M. and Nezhad, M.M. (2006), "Evaluation of liquefaction induced lateral displacements using genetic programming", Comput. Geotech., 33(4-5), 222-233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2006.05.001
  39. Javadi, A.A., Tan, T.P. and Elkassas, A.S.I. (2004a), "An intelligent finite element method", Proceeding of the 11th International EG-ICE Workshop, Weimar, Germany, 16-25.
  40. Javadi, A.A., Tan, T.P. and Elkassas, A.S.I. (2005), "Intelligent finite element method", Proceeding of the 3rd MIT Conference on Computational Fluid and Solid Mechanics, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
  41. Javadi, A.A., Tan, T.P., Elkassas, A.S.I. and Zhang, M. (2004b), "Intelligent finite element method: Development of the algorithm", Proceeding of the 6th World Congress on Computational Mechanics-WCCM VI, Beijing, China.
  42. Javadi, A.A., Tan, T.P. and Zhang, M. (2003), "Neural network for constitutive modeling in finite element analysis", Comput. Assist. Mech. Eng. Sci., 10, 375-381.
  43. Javadi, A.A., Tan, T.P. and Zhang, M. (2003), "Neural network for constitutive modeling in finite element analysis", Comput. Assist. Mech. Eng. Sci., 10, 375-381.
  44. Juang, C.H. and Chen, C.J. (1999), "CPT-based liquefaction evaluation using artificial neural networks", Comput. Aid. Civil Infrastruct. Eng., 14(3), 221-229. https://doi.org/10.1111/0885-9507.00143
  45. Juang, C.H., Jiang, T. and Christopher, R.A. (2001), "Three-dimensional site characterization: neural network approach", Geotechnique, 51(9), 799-809. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.2001.51.9.799
  46. Jung, S. and Ghaboussi, J. (2006), "Neural network constitutive model for rate-dependent materials", Comput. Struct., 84(15-16), 955-963. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2006.02.015
  47. Lu, M., AbouRizk, S.M. and Hermann, U.H. (2001), "Sensitivity analysis of neural networks in spool fabrication productivity studies", J. Comput. Civil Eng., ASCE, 15(4), 299-308. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3801(2001)15:4(299)
  48. Lu, P. and Rosenbaum, M.S. (2003), "Artificial neural networks and grey systems for the prediction of slope stability", Nat. Hazards, 30(3), 383-395. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:NHAZ.0000007168.00673.27
  49. Kawamoto, T., Ichkawa, Y. and Kyoya, T. (1988), "Deformation and fracturing behavior of discontinuous rock mass and damage mechanics theory", Int. J. Numer. Anal. Met. Geomech., 12(1), 1-30. https://doi.org/10.1002/nag.1610120102
  50. Koza, J.R. (1992), Genetic Programming: on the Programming of Computers by Natural Selection, Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
  51. Lade, P.V. and Duncan, J.M. (1975), "Elastoplastic stress-strain theory for cohesionless soil", J. Geotech. Eng. Division, ASCE, 101(GT10), 1037-1053.
  52. Lefik, M. and Schrefler, B.A. (2003), "Artificial neural network as an incremental non-linear constitutive model for finite element code", Comput. Method. Appl. Mech. Eng., 192, 3265-3283. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0045-7825(03)00350-5
  53. Lippmann, R.P. (1987), "An introduction to computing with neural nets", IEEE Acoust. Speech Signal Process Mag., 4(2), 4-22.
  54. Logar, J. and Turk, G. (1997), "Neural network as a constitutive model of soil", Zeitschrift für Angewandte Mathematik und Mechanik, 77(S1), 195-196.
  55. Millar, D.L. and Calderbank, P.A. (1995), "On the investigation of multilayer feedforward neural network model of rock deformability behavior", Proceeding of The 8th International Congress on Rock Mechanics, Tokyo, Japan, 933-938.
  56. Millar, D.L. and Clarici, E. (1994), "Investigation of back-propagation artificial neural networks in modeling the stress-strain behavior of sandstone rock", Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Neural Networks, Piscataway, NJ, 3326-3331.
  57. Najjar, Y.M. and Basheer, I.A. (1996), "Discussion of stress-strain modeling of sands using artificial neural networks", J. Geotech. Eng. Division, ASCE, 122(11), 949-950. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1996)122:11(949)
  58. Najjar, Y.M., Basheer, I.A. and Ali, H.E. (1999), "On the use of neuronets for simulating the stress-strain behavior of soils", Proceeding of the 7th International Symposium on Numerical Models in Geomechanics- NUMOG VII, Graz, Austria, 657-662.
  59. Owen, D.R.J. and Hinton, E. (1980), "Finite Elements in Plasticity: Theory and Practice", Pineridge Press, Swansea.
  60. Penumadu, D. and Chameau, J.L. (1997), "Geomaterial modeling using neural networks", Artificial Neural Networks for Civil Engineering: Fundamentals and Applications, N. Kartman, I. Flood, and Garrett, eds., ASCE, 160-184.
  61. Penumadu, D. and Zhao, R. (1999), "Triaxial compression behavior of sand and gravel using artificial neural networks", Comput. Geotech., 24(3), 207-230. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0266-352X(99)00002-6
  62. Penumadu, D., Zhao, R. and Frost, D. (2000), "Virtual geotechnical laboratory experiments using a simulator", Int. J. Numeri. Anal. Met. Geomech., 24(5), 439-451. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1096-9853(20000425)24:5<439::AID-NAG74>3.0.CO;2-G
  63. Press, W.H., Teukolsky, S.A., Vetterling, W.T. and Flannery, B.P. (1992), Numerical recipes, Cambridge University Press, UK.
  64. Rahman, M.S., Wang, J., Deng, W. and Carter, J.P. (2001), "A neural network model for the uplift capacity of suction caissons", Comput. Geotech., 28(4), 269-287. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0266-352X(00)00033-1
  65. Rezania, M. and Javadi, A.A. (2006), "Application of evolutionary programming techniques in geotechnical engineering", Proceeding of the 6th European Conference on Numerical Methods in Geotechnical Engineering, Schweiger H.F. (ed.), Graz, Austria, 677-682.
  66. Rezania, M. and Javadi, A.A. (2007), "A new genetic programming model for predicting settlement of shallow foundations", Can. Geotech. J., 44(12), 1462-1473. https://doi.org/10.1139/T07-063
  67. Rezania, M. and Javadi, A.A. (2008a), "Predicting settlement of shallow foundations using evolutionary polynomial regression", Comput. Aid. Civil Infrastruct. Eng., (Under Review).
  68. Rezania, M. and Javadi, A.A. (2008b), "Settlement prediction of shallow foundations; a new approach", Proceeding of the 2nd British Geotechnical Association International Conference on Foundations, Dundee, Scotland, Paper No. 539.
  69. Rezania, M., Javadi, A.A. and Giustolisi, O. (2008a), "An evolutionary-based data mining technique for assessment of civil engineering systems", J. Eng. Computat., 25(6), 500-517. https://doi.org/10.1108/02644400810891526
  70. Rezania, M., Javadi, A.A. and Giustolisi, O. (2008b), "Evaluation of liquefaction potential based on CPT results using evolutionary polynomial regression", Comput. Geotech., (Under Review).
  71. Roscoe, K.H. and Schofield, A.N. (1963), "Mechanical behavior of an idealized 'wet' clay", Proceeding of the 2nd European Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, Wiesbaden, Germany, 47-54.
  72. Rumelhart, D.E., Hinton, G.E. and Williams, R.J. (1986), "Learning representations by back-propagating errors", Nature, 323, 533-536. https://doi.org/10.1038/323533a0
  73. Rumelhart, D.E., Hinton, G.E. and Williams, R.J. (1994), Learning Internal Representation by Error Propagation in Parallel Distributed Processing, Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
  74. Shin, H.S. (2001), "Neural network based constitutive models for finite element analysis", Ph.D. dissertation, University of Wales Swansea, UK.
  75. Shin, H.S. and Pande, G.N. (2000), "On self-learning finite element code based on monitored response of structures", Comput. Geotech., 27, 161-178. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0266-352X(00)00016-1
  76. Shin, H.S. and Pande, G.N. (2001), "Intelligent finite elements", Proceeding of Asian-Pacific Conference for Computational Mechanics-APCOM 01, Sydney, Australia, 1301-1310.
  77. Shin, H.S. and Pande, G.N. (2002), "Enhancement of data for training neural network based constitutive models for geomaterials", Proceeding of The 8th International Symposium on Numerical Models in Geomechanics-NUMOG VIII, Rome, Italy, 141-146.
  78. Sidarta, D.E. and Ghaboussi, J. (1998), "Constitutive modeling of geomaterials from non-uniform material tests", Comput. Geotech., 22(1), 53-71. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0266-352X(97)00035-9
  79. Toll, D.G. (1996), Artificial Intelligence Applications in Geotechnical Engineering, Electronic Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, .
  80. Wu, H.C., Zhang, X.B., Bao, T. and Al-Jibouri, S.H. (2001), "Modeling the stress-strain relation for granite using finite element-neural network hybrid algorithms", Proceeding of the 10th International Conference on Computer Methods and Advances in Geomechanics, Tucson, Arizona, 241-245.
  81. Youd, T.L., Hansen, C.M. and Bartlett, S.F. (2002), "Revised multilinear regression equations for prediction of lateral spread displacement", J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., ASCE, 128(12), 1007-1017. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2002)128:12(1007)
  82. Zhu, J.-H., Zaman, M.M. and Anderson, S.A. (1998a), "Modeling of soil behavior with a recurrent neural network", Can. Geotech. J., 35(5), 858-872. https://doi.org/10.1139/t98-042
  83. Zhu, J.-H., Zaman, M.M. and Anderson, S.A. (1998b), "Modeling of shearing behavior of a residual soil with recurrent neural network", Int. J. Numer. Anal. Met. Geomech., 22(8), 671-687. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1096-9853(199808)22:8<671::AID-NAG939>3.0.CO;2-Y

Cited by

  1. Formulation of flow number of asphalt mixes using a hybrid computational method vol.25, pp.3, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2010.09.010
  2. Formulation of secant and reloading soil deformation moduli using multi expression programming vol.29, pp.2, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1108/02644401211206043
  3. Lateral load bearing capacity modelling of piles in cohesive soils in undrained conditions: An intelligent evolutionary approach vol.24, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2014.07.027
  4. Identification of coupling parameters between shear strength behaviour of compacted soils and chemical’s effects with an evolutionary-based data mining technique vol.48, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2012.10.005
  5. Gene expression programming approach to cost estimation formulation for utility projects vol.23, pp.1, 2017, https://doi.org/10.3846/13923730.2016.1210214
  6. A new prediction model for the load capacity of castellated steel beams vol.67, pp.7, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2011.01.014
  7. An evolutionary approach to modelling the thermomechanical behaviour of unsaturated soils vol.39, pp.5, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1002/nag.2323
  8. A robust data mining approach for formulation of geotechnical engineering systems vol.28, pp.3, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1108/02644401111118132
  9. Finite Element Model Fractional Steps Updating Strategy for Spatial Lattice Structures Based on Generalized Regression Neural Network vol.2016, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/5845326
  10. Evolutionary-based approaches for determining the deviatoric stress of calcareous sands vol.50, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2012.07.006
  11. Estimating Shear Strength of Short Rectangular Reinforced Concrete Columns Using Nonlinear Regression and Gene Expression Programming vol.12, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2017.07.002
  12. A hybrid computational approach to formulate soil deformation moduli obtained from PLT vol.123, pp.4, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2011.09.005
  13. Predicting torsional strength of RC beams by using Evolutionary Polynomial Regression vol.47, pp.1, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advengsoft.2011.11.001
  14. A robust predictive model for base shear of steel frame structures using a hybrid genetic programming and simulated annealing method vol.20, pp.8, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-011-0689-0
  15. Intelligent finite element method: An evolutionary approach to constitutive modeling vol.23, pp.4, 2009, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2009.06.008
  16. New tools to determine bubble point pressure of crude oils: Experimental and modeling study vol.123, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2014.08.018
  17. Developing constitutive models from EPR-based self-learning finite element analysis vol.42, pp.3, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1002/nag.2747
  18. A reliable strategy to calculate minimum miscibility pressure of CO 2 -oil system in miscible gas flooding processes vol.208, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2017.06.135
  19. Nonlinear genetic-based simulation of soil shear strength parameters vol.120, pp.6, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12040-011-0119-9
  20. Modelling mechanical behaviour of rubber concrete using evolutionary polynomial regression vol.28, pp.4, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1108/02644401111131902
  21. GIS application and econometric analysis for the verification of the financial feasibility of roof-top wind turbines in the city of Bari (Italy) vol.70, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.12.005
  22. Nonlinear modeling of soil deformation modulus through LGP-based interpretation of pressuremeter test results vol.25, pp.7, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2011.11.008
  23. Novel Approach to Strength Modeling of Concrete under Triaxial Compression vol.24, pp.9, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000494
  24. EPR-based material modelling of soils considering volume changes vol.48, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2012.05.015
  25. Evolutionary metaheuristic intelligence to simulate tensile loads in reinforcement for geosynthetic-reinforced soil structures vol.66, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2015.01.001
  26. Linear and nonlinear model updating of reinforced concrete T-beam bridges using artificial neural networks vol.119, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2012.12.017
  27. An evolutionary modelling approach to predicting stress-strain behaviour of saturated granular soils vol.35, pp.8, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1108/EC-01-2018-0025
  28. High-precision modeling of uplift capacity of suction caissons using a hybrid computational method vol.2, pp.4, 2009, https://doi.org/10.12989/gae.2010.2.4.253
  29. Predicting Triaxial Compressive Strength and Young’s Modulus of Frozen Sand Using Artificial Intelligence Methods vol.33, pp.3, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)cr.1943-5495.0000188
  30. Estimation of ultimate bearing capacity of shallow foundations resting on cohesionless soils using a new hybrid M5'-GP model vol.19, pp.2, 2009, https://doi.org/10.12989/gae.2019.19.2.127
  31. Prediction of side thermal buoyant discharge in the cross flow using multi-objective evolutionary polynomial regression (EPR-MOGA) vol.21, pp.6, 2019, https://doi.org/10.2166/hydro.2019.010
  32. Smart Farming: An Enhanced Pursuit of Sustainable Remote Livestock Tracking and Geofencing Using IoT and GPRS vol.2020, pp.None, 2009, https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/6660733
  33. Application of artificial neural networks in settlement prediction of shallow foundations on sandy soils vol.20, pp.5, 2009, https://doi.org/10.12989/gae.2020.20.5.385
  34. Practice of artificial intelligence in geotechnical engineering vol.21, pp.6, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1631/jzus.a20aige1
  35. Evaluation of geological conditions and clogging of tunneling using machine learning vol.25, pp.1, 2009, https://doi.org/10.12989/gae.2021.25.1.059
  36. State-of-the-Art Review of Machine Learning Applications in Constitutive Modeling of Soils vol.28, pp.5, 2009, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11831-020-09524-z
  37. Artificial intelligence-enabled smart mechanical metamaterials: advent and future trends vol.66, pp.6, 2009, https://doi.org/10.1080/09506608.2020.1815394
  38. Gaussian Process Regression-Based Material Model for Stochastic Structural Analysis vol.7, pp.3, 2009, https://doi.org/10.1061/ajrua6.0001138