DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A study on nonlinear seismic response analysis of building considering frequency dependent soil impedance in time domain

  • Received : 2008.03.23
  • Accepted : 2008.08.15
  • Published : 2009.03.25

Abstract

In order to accurately estimate the seismic behavior of buildings, it is important to consider both nonlinear characteristics of the buildings and the frequency dependency of the soil impedance. Therefore, transform methods of the soil impedance in the frequency domain to the impulse response in the time domain are needed because the nonlinear analysis can not be carried out in the frequency domain. The author has proposed practical transform methods. In this paper, seismic response analyses considering frequency dependent soil impedance in the time domain are shown. First, the formulation of the proposed transform methods is described. Then, the linear and nonlinear earthquake response analyses of a building on 2-layered soil were carried out using the transformed impulse responses. Through these analyses, the validity and efficiency of the methods were confirmed.

Keywords

References

  1. de Barros, F.C.P. and Luco, J.E. (1990), "Discrete models for vertical vibrations of surface and embedded foundations", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 19, 289-303. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.4290190211
  2. Hayashi, Y. and Katsukura, Y. (1990), "Effective time domain soil-structure interaction analysis based on FFT algorithm with causality condition", Earthq. Struct. Dyn., 19, 693-708. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.4290190506
  3. Meek, J.W. (1990), "Recursive analysis of dynamic phenomena in civil engineering", Bautechnik, 67, 205-210 (In German).
  4. Motosaka, M. and Nagano, M. (1992), "Recursive evaluation of convolution integral in nonlinear soil-structure interaction analysis and its applications", J. Struct. Constr. Eng. (AIJ), 436, 71-80 (In Japanese).
  5. Nakamura, N. (2005), "A practical method for estimating dynamic soil stiffness on surface of multi-layered soil", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 34, 1391-1406. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.487
  6. Nakamura, N. (2006a), "A practical method to transform frequency dependent impedance to time domain", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 35, 217-231. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.520
  7. Nakamura, N. (2006b), "Improved methods to transform frequency dependent dynamic stiffness to time domain", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 35, 1037-1050. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.570
  8. Ohsaki, Y., Hara, A. and Kiyota, Y. (1978), "Stress-strain model of soils for seismic analisys", Proc of 5th Japan Earthquake Eng. Symposium, 697-704 (in Japanese).
  9. Tajimi, H., (1980), "A contribution to theoretical prediction of dynamic stiffness of surface foundations", Proceeding of 7th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Istanbul, Turkey, 105-112.
  10. Wolf, J.P. and Obernhuber, P. (1985), "Nonlinear soil-structure interaction analysis using dynamic stiffness or flexibility of soil in the time domain", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 13, 195-212. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.4290130205
  11. Wolf, J.P. and Motosaka, M. (1989), "Recursive evaluation of interaction force of unbounded soil in the time domain", Earthq. Struct. Dyn., 18, 345-363. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.4290180304
  12. Wolf, J.P. (1997), "Spring-dashpot-mass models for foundation vibrations", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 26, 931-949. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1096-9845(199709)26:9<931::AID-EQE686>3.0.CO;2-M
  13. Wu, W.H. and Lee, W.H. (2002), "Systematic lumped-parameter models for foundations based on polynomialfraction approximation", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 31, 1383-1412. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.168

Cited by

  1. A BASIC STUDY ON THE TRANSFER METHOD OF FREQUENCY DEPENDENT FUNCTIONS INTO TIME DOMAIN vol.75, pp.653, 2009, https://doi.org/10.3130/aijs.75.1237