Primary Radiation Force to Ultrasound Contrast Agents in Propagating and Standing Acoustic Field

  • Seo, Jong-Bum (Department of Biomedical Engineering, Yonsei University)
  • Published : 2009.03.31

Abstract

Primary radiation force on ultrasound contrast agents (UCA) in a propagating and standing acoustic field was explored. A specific ultrasound contrast agent $Albunex^{(R)}$ and $Optison^{(R)}$ were chosen for simulation. The model was developed based on a shelled bubble model proposed by Church. The numerical simulation suggests that bubble translational motion is more significant in therapeutic ultrasound due to higher intensity and long pulse duration. Even a single cycle of a propagating wave of 4 MPa at 1 MHz can cause a bubble translational motion of greater than $1{\mu}m$ which is approximately one tenth of capillary. Hence, UCA characteristics can be significantly changed in therapeutic ultrasound without rapid bubble collapses.

Keywords

References

  1. Goldberg BB, Raichlen JS, Forsberg F, Ultrasound Contrast Agents: Basic principles and clinical applications 2nd ed. Martin Dunitz, 2001
  2. Dayton PA, Morgan KE, Klibanov AL, Brandenburger G, Nightingale KR, Ferrara KW, 'A Preliminary Evaluation of the Effects of Primary and Secondary Radiation Forces on Acoustic Contrast Agents', IEEE Trans. UFFC. vol, 44, pp, 1264-1276, 1997 https://doi.org/10.1109/58.656630
  3. Dayton PA, Klibanov AL, Brandenburger G, Ferrara K, 'AcousticRadiation Force in vivo: A mechanism to assist targeting of microbubbles', Ultrasound Med. & BioI, Vol. 25, PP. 195-1201, 1999
  4. Kaneko Y, Allen JS, Yoshizawa S, Matsumoto Y, 'Heating Mechanism of Microbubbles and bubble properties', IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium 2004 https://doi.org/10.1109/ULTSYM.2004.1417876
  5. Umemura S, Kawabata K, Hashiba K, 'Enhancement of ultrasonic absorption by microbubbles for therapeutic application', IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium 2001 https://doi.org/10.1109/ULTSYM.2001.991961
  6. Miller DL, Kripfgans OD, Fowlkes JB, Carson PL, 'Cavitation nucleation agents for nonthermal ultrasound surgery'. J. Acoust. Soc, Am. vol, 107, pp, 3480-3486, 2000 https://doi.org/10.1121/1.429418
  7. Tran BC, Seo J, Hall TL, Fowlkes JB, Cain CA. 'Microbubble-enhanced cavitation for noninvasive ultrasound surgery', IEEE Trans. UFFC, Vol. 50, PP. 1296-1304, 2003 https://doi.org/10.1109/TUFFC.2003.1244746
  8. Tran BC, Seo J, Hall TL, Fowlkes JB, Cain CA. 'Effects of contrast agent infusion rates on thresholds for tissue damage produced bym single exposures of high-intensity ultrasound'. IEEE Trans. UFFC. Vol. 52, PP. 1111-1120, 2005 https://doi.org/10.1109/TUFFC.2005.1503998
  9. Seo J, Choi JJ, Fowlkes JB, O'Donnell M, Cain CA. 'Aberration Correction by Nonlinear Beam mixing: Generation of a Pseudo Point Sound Source'. IEEE Trans. UFFC. Vol. 52, PP. 1970-1980, 2005 https://doi.org/10.1109/TUFFC.2005.1561666
  10. de Jong N, Cornet R, Lancee CT. 'Higher harmonics of vibrating gas-filled microspheres'. Part one: simulations. Ultrasonics. vol. 32, no. 447-452, 1994 https://doi.org/10.1016/0041-624X(94)90064-7
  11. Church CC. 'The effects of an elastic solid surface layer on the radial pulsations of gas bubbles'. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. vol. 97, pp. 1510-1521, 1995 https://doi.org/10.1121/1.412091
  12. Commander KW, Prosperetii A. 'Linear pressure waves in bubbly liquids: Comparison between theory and experiments'. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. Vol. 85, PP. 732-746, 1989 https://doi.org/10.1121/1.397599
  13. Kargl SG. 'Effective approach to linear acoustics in bubbly liquids'. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. vol. 111, PP. 168-173, 2002 https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1427356
  14. Ye Z, Ding L. 'Acoustic dispersion and attenuation relations in bubbly mixture'. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. vol. 98, PP. 1629-1636, 1995 https://doi.org/10.1121/1.413429
  15. Leighton TG. The Acoustic Bubble. Academic Press, 1997
  16. Kreyszig E. Advanced Engineering Mathematics 7th ed. John Willey & Sons, 1993
  17. Prosperetii A. 'Thermal effects and damping mechanisms in the forced radial oscillations of gas bubbles in liquidS'. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. Vol. 61, pp. 17-27, 1977 https://doi.org/10.1121/1.381252
  18. Hoff L. Acoustics Characterization of contrast agents for medical ultrasound imaging. Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2001
  19. Hoff L. 'Acoustic properties of ultrasonic contrast agents'. Ultrasonics. Vol. 34, pp. 591-593, 1996 https://doi.org/10.1016/0041-624X(96)00035-2
  20. GE Healthcare. OPT-1B. http://www.amershamhealth-us.com. 2006
  21. Bristol-Myers Squibb Medical Imaging. Definity. http://www.definityimaging.com/pdf/prescribinginfo.pdf. 2007