Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics

  • 제34권2호
  • /
  • Pages.137-144
  • /
  • 2009
  • /
  • 2234-7658(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2234-7666(eISSN)
대한치과보존학회 (The Korean Academy of Conservative Dentistry)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

하악 제1 대구치 근단부의 형태학적 연구

MORPHOLOGY OF THE APICAL ROOT CANAL SYSTEM IN KOREAN MANDIBULAR FIRST MOLAR

  • 정현 (경희대학교 대학원 치의학과 치과보존학교실) ;
  • 박상진 (경희대학교 대학원 치의학과 치과보존학교실) ;
  • 박상혁 (경희대학교 대학원 치의학과 치과보존학교실) ;
  • 최기운 (경희대학교 대학원 치의학과 치과보존학교실)
  • Jeong, Hyeon (Department of Conservative Dentistry, Division of Dentistry, Graduate of Kyung Hee University) ;
  • Park, Sang-Jin (Department of Conservative Dentistry, Division of Dentistry, Graduate of Kyung Hee University) ;
  • Park, Sang-Hyuk (Department of Conservative Dentistry, Division of Dentistry, Graduate of Kyung Hee University) ;
  • Choi, Gi-Woon (Department of Conservative Dentistry, Division of Dentistry, Graduate of Kyung Hee University)
  • 발행 : 2009.03.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 연구는 한국인의 하악 제1 대구치 60개를 대상으로 생리적 근단공의 크기와 형태, 근심 치근의 치근단 3mm에서 isthmus의 발생 빈도와 형태, 그리고 원심 치근의 치근단 3mm의 근관 형태를 입체현미경하에서 60배로 조사한 결과 다음과 같은 결론을 얻었다. 1.근심 치근은 두 개의 근단공을 가지는 비율이 높았으며(51.67%), 원심 치근은 하나의 근단공을 가지는 비율이 높았다(71.66%). 2. 부근단공의 빈도는 근심 치근의 1개의 근단공을 가지는 경우가 가장 높았다(26.07%) 3. 생리적 근단공의 크기는 근심 치근에서 하나의 근단공을 가지는 경우 0.329mm, 근심 협측 근단공은 0.266mm, 근심 설측 근단공은 0.246mm였으며, 원심 치근에서 하나의 근단공을 가지는 경우 0.375mm, 원심 협측 근단공은 0.291mm, 원심 설측 근단공은 0.237mm로 나타났다. 4. 근단공의 형태는 oval 형태 (69.93%)가 가장 많았다. 5.근심 치근의 치근단 3mm에서 isthmus의 발생빈도는 55%였으며, partial isthmus는 31.66%, complete isth-mus는 23.34%로 나타났다. 6.원심 치근의 치근단 3mm의 근관 형태는 oval형태(50.64%)가 가장 많았다. 이상의 연구 결과 하악 제1대구치의 성공적인 근관 치료를 위해서는 생리적 근단공의 실제 크기와 형태 및 isthmus의 존재에 대한사전 지식이 필요할 것이다.

The aim of this study was to investigate the shapes and diameters of the physiological foramen and anatomy of the root canal at 3mm from apex in mandibular first molars. Sixty mandibular first molars were randomly selected. The apical anatomy of 60 mandibular first molars was investigated by means of a stereo microscope (60x magnification). The results were as follows; 1. There was a high percentage of two physiological foramina in mesial (61.67%) and one foramen in distal(71.66%) roots of mandibular first molars. 2. There was a high frequency of accessory foramina in mesial roots with one foramen (26.07%). 3. The diameters of physiological foramen was as follows: - 0.329mm in single mesial foramen - 0.266mm in mesiobuccal foramen and 0.246mm in mesiolingual foramen - 0.375mm in single distal foramen - 0.291mm in distobuccal foramen and 0.237mm in distolingual foramen 4. The most common physiological foramen shape was oval (69.93%). 5. The incidence of isthmus in mesial root at 3mm from apex was 55%. The 3mm-sections contained a complete isthmus 31.66% and a partial isthmus 23.34%. 6. 3mm from the apex, the most common canal shape was oval (50.64%). Knowledge of the apical anatomy of mandibular first molar would be necessary for success of surgical and nonsurgical endodontic treatment.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Schilder H. Filling root canals in three dimensions. J Endod 32(4):281-90. 2006 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2006.02.007
  2. Jou YT. Karabucak B. Levin J. Endodontic working width: current concepts and techniques. Dent Clin North Am 48(1) :323-335. 2004 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cden.2003.12.006
  3. Simon JHS. The apex: how critical is it? Gen Dent 42(4) :330-334, 1994
  4. Dean B, James W. The role of apical instrumentation in root canal treatment: a review of the literature. J Endod 31(5):333-340, 2005 https://doi.org/10.1097/01.don.0000145422.94578.e6
  5. Weine F. Endodontic therapy. 3rd ed., C. V. Mosby, St. Louis, 282-283, 1982
  6. Walton RE. Histologic e、raluation of different methods of enlarging the pulp canal space. J Endod 2(10) :304-311. 1976 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(76)80045-3
  7. Wu MK. Barkis DRA, Wesseling P. Does the first file to bind correspond to the diameter of the canal in the apical region? Int Endod J 35(3) :264-267, 2002 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2591.2002.00474.x
  8. Lumley PJ , Walmsley AD, Walton RE, Rippin JW. Cleaning of oval canals using ultrasonic or sonic instrumentation. J Endod 19(9) :453-457, 1993 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(06)80532-7
  9. Wu MK, Wesselink PH. A primary observation on the preparation and obturation in oval canals. Int Endod J 34(2): 137-41 , 2001 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2591.2001.00361.x
  10. Marroquin BB , AI-sayed MAA, WillershausenZonnchen B. Morphology of the physiological foramen: 1. Maxillary and mandibular molars. J Endod 30(5): 321-328. 2004 https://doi.org/10.1097/00004770-200405000-00005
  11. Wu MK. R' oris A. Barkis D. Paul R. Wesselink PR. Prevalance and extent of long oval canals in the apical third. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radial Endod 89(6) :739-743. 2000 https://doi.org/10.1067/moe.2000.106344
  12. Weller NR. Niemczyk SP. Kim S. Incidence and position of the canal isthmus. Part 1. Mesiobuccal root of the maxillary first mola r. J Endod 21(7): 380-383. 1995 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(06)80975-1
  13. Mannocci F. Peru M. Sherriff M. Pitt Ford TR. Cook R. The isthmuses of the mesial root of mandibular molars: a micro-computed tomographic study. Int Endod J 38(8) :558-563. 2005 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2005.00994.x
  14. Hsu YY. Kim S. The resected root surface. The issue of canal isthmuses. Dent Clin North Am 41(3) :529-540. 1997
  15. von Arx T. Frequency and type of canal isthmuses in first molars detected by endoscopic inspection during periradicular surgery. lnt Endod J 38(3): 160-168. 2005 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2004.00915.x
  16. von Arx T. Walker W. Microsurgical instruments for root-end cavity preparation following apicoectomy. Endod Dent Traumatol I6(2):47-62. 2000 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-9657.2000.016002047.x
  17. Rubinstein RA. Kim S. Short-term observation of the results of endodontic surgery with the use of a surgical operation microscope and super-EBA as root-end filling material. J Endod 25(1):43-48. 1999 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(99)80398-7
  18. Kim S. Pecora G. Rubinstein RA. Color atlas of micro surgery in endodontics. W.B. Saunders Company. Philadelphia. 89-92. 2001
  19. Morfis A. Sylaras SN. Georgopoulou M. Kernani M. Prountzos F. Study of the apices of human permanent teeth with the use of a scanning electron microscope. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 77(2):172-176. 1994 https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-4220(94)90281-X
  20. Peak JD. Hayes SJ. Bryant ST, Dummer PM. The out come of root canal treatment. A retrospective studye within the armed forces. Br Dent J 190(3):140-144. 2001 https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4800907a
  21. Harty FJ, Parkins BJ. Wengraf AM. Success rate in root canal therapy. A retrospective study of conventional cases. Br Dent J 128(2):65-70. 1970 https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4802429
  22. Cohen S. Burns RC. Herbranson EJ. Pathways of the pulp. 8th ed.. Mosby. St. Louis. 710-713. 2002
  23. Blaskovic-Subat V. Smojver B. Maricic B. Sutalo J. A computerized method for the evaluation of root canal morphology. Int Endod J 28(6):290-296. 1995 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.1995.tb00318.x
  24. Peters GA. Laib B. Ruegsegger P. Barbakow F. Three-dimensional analysis of root canal geometry by high-resolution computed tomography. J Dent Res 79(6):1405-1409. 2000 https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345000790060901
  25. Kuttler Y. Microscopic investigation of root apexes. J Am Dent Assoc. 50(5):544-552. 1955 https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.1955.0099
  26. Burch JG. Hulen S. The relationship of the apical foramen to the anatomical apex of the tooth root. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 34(2):262-268, 1972 https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-4220(72)90418-5
  27. Ponce EH. Vilar Fernandez J. The cemento-dentino canal junction. the apical foramen. and the apical con striction: evaluation by optical microscopy. J Endod 29(3):214-219. 2003 https://doi.org/10.1097/00004770-200303000-00013
  28. Buchanan Ls. The standardized- taper root canal preparation: part 1. concept for variably tapered shaping instruments. Int Endod J 33(6):516-529. 2000 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2591.2000.00384.x
  29. Teixeira FB. Sano CL. Gomes BPFA, Zaia AA. Ferraz CCR, Souza Filho FJ. A preliminary in vitro study of the incidence and position of the root canal isthmus in maxillary and mandibular first molars. Int Endod J 36(4):276-80. 2003 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2591.2003.00638.x
  30. Pineda F. Roentgenographic investigation of the mesiobuccal root of the maxillary first molar. Oral Surg 36(2):253-260. 1973 https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-4220(73)90247-8
  31. Yang SF , Rivera EM. Baumgardener KR. Walton RE. Stanford C. Anaerobic tissue-dissolving abilities of calcium hydroxide and sodium hypochlorite. J Endod 21(12):613-616. 1995 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(06)81114-3

피인용 문헌

  1. An evaluation of canal curvature at the apical one third in type II mesial canals of mandibular molars vol.37, pp.2, 2012, https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2012.37.2.104