The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics

  • 제1권1호
  • /
  • Pages.19-25
  • /
  • 2009
  • /
  • 2005-7806(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2005-7814(eISSN)
대한치과보철학회 (The Korean Academy of Prosthodonitics)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The effect of various thread designs on the initial stability of taper implants

  • Park, Ju-Hee (Department of Prosthodontics, Graduate School, Seoul National University) ;
  • Lim, Young-Jun (Department of Prosthodontics, Graduate School, Seoul National University) ;
  • Kim, Myung-Joo (Department of Prosthodontics, Graduate School, Seoul National University) ;
  • Kwon, Ho-Beom (Department of Prosthodontics, Graduate School, Seoul National University)
  • 발행 : 2009.03.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM. Primary stability at the time of implant placement is related to the level of primary bone contact. The level of bone contact with implant is affected by thread design, surgical procedure and bone quality, etc. PURPOSE. The aim of this study was to compare the initial stability of the various taper implants according to the thread designs, half of which were engaged to inferior cortical wall of type IV bone(Group 1) and the rest of which were not engaged to inferior cortical wall(Group 2) by measuring the implant stability quotient(ISQ) and the removal torque value(RTV). MATERIAL AND METHODS. In this study, 6 different implant fixtures with 10 mm length were installed. In order to simulate the sinus inferior wall of type IV bone, one side cortical bone of swine rib was removed. 6 different implants were installed in the same bone block following manufacturer s recommended procedures. Total 10 bone blocks were made for each group. The height of Group 1 bone block was 10 mm for engagement and that of group 2 was 13 mm. The initial stability was measured with ISQ value using Osstell $mentor^{(R)}$ and with removal torque using MGT50 torque gauge. RESULTS. In this study, we found the following results. 1. In Group 1 with fixtures engaged to the inferior cortical wall, there was no significant difference in RTV and ISQ value among the 6 types of implants. 2. In Group 2 with fixtures not engaged to the inferior cortical wall, there was significant difference in RTV and ISQ value among the 6 types of implants(P < .05). 3. There was significant difference in RTV and ISQ value according to whether fixtures were engaged to the inferior cortical wall or not(P < .05). 4. Under-drilling made RTV and ISQ value increase significantly in the NT implants which had lower RTV and ISQ value in Group 2(P < .05). CONCLUSIONS. Without being engaged to the inferior cortical wall fixtures had initial stability affected by implant types. Also in poor quality bone, under-drilling improved initial stability.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Scarano A, Degidi M, Iezzi G, Petrone G, Piattelli A. Correlation between implant stability quotient and bone-implant contact: a retrospective histological and histomorphometrical study of seven titanium implants retrieved from humans. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2006;8:218-22. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8208.2006.00022.x
  2. O'Sullivan D, Sennerby L, Meredith N. Measurements comparing the initial stability of five designs of dental implants: a human cadaver study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2000;2:85-92. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8208.2000.tb00110.x
  3. Alsaadi G, Quirynen M, Michiels K, Jacobs R, van Steenberghe D. A biomechanical assessment of the relation between the oral implant stability at insertion and subjective bone quality assessment. J Clin Periodontol 2007;34:359-66. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.2007.01047.x
  4. Johansson P, Strid KG. Assessment of bone quality from placement resistance during implant surgery. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1994;9:279-88.
  5. Tricio J, Laohapand P, van Steenberghe D, Quirynen M, Naert I. Mechanical state assessment of the implant-bone continuum: a better understanding of the Periotest method. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1995;10:43-9.
  6. Rasmusson L, Meredith N, Kahnberg KE, Sennerby L. Stability assessments and histology of titanium implants placed simultaneously with autogenous onlay bone in the rabbit tibia. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1998;27:229-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0901-5027(98)80019-2
  7. Ueda M, Matsuki M, Jacobsson M, Tjellstrom A. Relationship between insertion torque and removal torque analyzed in fresh temporal bone. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1991;6:442-7.
  8. Ivanoff CJ, Grondahl K, Sennerby L, Bergstrom C, Lekholm U. Influence of variations in implant diameters: a 3- to 5-year retrospective clinical report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1999;14:173-80.
  9. Steigenga JT, al-Shammari KF, Nociti FH, Misch CE, Wang HL. Dental implant design and its relationship to long-term implant success. Implant Dent 2003;12:306-17. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ID.0000091140.76130.A1
  10. Block CM, Tillmanns HW, Meffert RM. Histologic evaluation of the LaminOss osteocompressive dental screw: a pilot study. Compend Contin Educ Dent 1997;18:676-80, 682-4, 685.
  11. Balleri P, Cozzolino A, Ghelli L, Momicchioli G, Varriale A. Stability measurements of osseointegrated implants using Osstell in partially edentulous jaws after 1 year of loading: a pilot study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2002;4:128-32. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8208.2002.tb00162.x
  12. Miyamoto I, Tsuboi Y, Wada E, Suwa H, Iizuka T. Influence of cortical bone thickness and implant length on implant stability at the time of surgery--clinical, prospective, biomechanical, and imaging study. Bone 2005;37:776-80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bone.2005.06.019
  13. Nkenke E, Hahn M, Weinzierl K, Radespiel-Troger M, Neukam FW, Engelke K. Implant stability and histomorphometry: a correlation study in human cadavers using stepped cylinder implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 2003;14:601-9. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2003.00937.x
  14. Ostman PO, Hellman M, Wendelhag I, Sennerby L. Resonance frequency analysis measurements of implants at placement surgery. Int J Prosthodont 2006;19:77-83.
  15. da Cunha HA, Francischone CE, Filho HN, de Oliveira RC. A comparison between cutting torque and resonance frequency in the assessment of primary stability and final torque capacity of standard and TiUnite single-tooth implants under immediate loading. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2004;19:578-85.
  16. Zix J, Kessler-Liechti G, Mericske-Stern R. Stability measurements of 1-stage implants in the maxilla by means of resonance frequency analysis: a pilot study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2005;20:747-52.
  17. Rocci A, Martignoni M, Burgos PM, Gottlow J, Sennerby L. Histology of retrieved immediately and early loaded oxidized implants: light microscopic observations after 5 to 9 months of loading in the posterior mandible. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2003;5:88-98. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8208.2003.tb00020.x
  18. Rabel A, Kohler SG, Schmidt-Westhausen AM. Clinical study on the primary stability of two dental implant systems with resonance frequency analysis. Clin Oral Investig 2007;11:257-65. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-007-0115-2
  19. Fernandes Ede L, Unikowski IL, Teixeira ER, da Costa NP, Shinkai RS. Primary stability of turned and acid-etched screwtype implants: a removal torque and histomorphometric study in rabbits. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2007;22:886-92.
  20. Akkocaoglu M, Cehreli MC, Tekdemir I, Comert A, Guzel E, Dagdeviren A, Akca K. Primary stability of simultaneously placed dental implants in extraoral donor graft sites: a human cadaver study. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2007;65:400-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2005.12.073
  21. Niimi A, Ozeki K, Ueda M, Nakayama B. A comparative study of removal torque of endosseous implants in the fibula, iliac crest and scapula of cadavers: preliminary report. Clin Oral Implants Res 1997;8:286-9. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1997.080406.x

피인용 문헌

  1. Analysis of thermal changes in bone by various insertion torques with different implant designs vol.49, pp.2, 2011, https://doi.org/10.4047/jkap.2011.49.2.168
  2. The seven-year cumulative survival rate of Osstem implants vol.40, pp.2, 2014, https://doi.org/10.5125/jkaoms.2014.40.2.68
  3. The effect of implant macro-thread design on implant stability in the early post-operative period: a randomized, controlled pilot study vol.28, pp.10, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.12945
  4. Prospective randomized clinical trial of hydrophilic tapered implant placement at maxillary posterior area: 6 weeks and 12 weeks loading vol.8, pp.5, 2016, https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2016.8.5.396
  5. Comparison between tapered and cylindrical implants in the posterior regions of the mandible: A prospective, randomized, split-mouth clinical trial focusing on implant stability changes during early healing vol.19, pp.4, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.12501
  6. The effects of local factors on the survival of dental implants: A 19 year retrospective study vol.48, pp.1, 2010, https://doi.org/10.4047/jkap.2010.48.1.28
  7. The effect of osseodensification and different thread designs on the dental implant primary stability vol.7, pp.2046-1402, 2018, https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.17292.1
  8. Osstell Resonance Frequency Measurement Values as a Prognostic Factor in Implant Dentistry vol.41, pp.4, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1563/aaid-joi-d-13-00172
  9. Primary stability of narrow‐diameter dental implants with a multiple condensing thread design placed in bone with and without osteotomes: An in vitro study vol.22, pp.3, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.12908
  10. Influence of Implant Design and Under-Preparation of the Implant Site on Implant Primary Stability. An In Vitro Study vol.17, pp.12, 2020, https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17124436