Journal of Periodontal and Implant Science

Korean Academy of Periodontology (대한치주과학회)
권호 표지

Clinical and radiographic evaluation of implants with dual-microthread: 1-year study

이중미세나사산 임플란트의 임상적 및 방사선학적 1년 평가

  • Kwon, Mi-A (Department of Periodontology, School of Dentistry, Pusan National University) ;
  • Kim, Yong-Deok (Department of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Pusan National University) ;
  • Jeong, Chang-Mo (Department of Prosthodintics, School of Dentistry, Pusan National University) ;
  • Lee, Ju-Youn (Department of Periodontology, School of Dentistry, Pusan National University)
  • 권미아 (부산대학교 치의학전문대학원 치주과학교실) ;
  • 김용덕 (분산대학교 치의학전문대학원 구강악안면외과학교실) ;
  • 정창모 (부산대학교 치의학전문대학원 보철과학교실) ;
  • 이주연 (부산대학교 치의학전문대학원 치주과학교실)
  • Published : 2009.03.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Purpose: The stability of periodontal condition and marginal bone level were important to achieve long-term success of dental implant treatment. The aim of this study was to evaluate periodontal conditions and marginal bone loss around 67 GSII(OSSTEM, Seoul, Korea) dental implants with dual-microthread at the neck portion, 1 year after prosthetic loading. Materials and methods: Sixty-seven GS II dental implants in 27 patients(mean age; $47.4{\pm}14.0$ years) who received implant treatments at Pusan National University Hospital, were included in this study. Thirteen US II(OSSTEM, Seoul, Korea) implants with smooth neck design were selected for the control group. Periodontal and radiographic evaluations were carried out at baseline, 6 months and 12 months after prosthetic loading. Results: In the GS II group, plaque index(PI), gingival index(GI) and probing depth(PD) increased as time passed. In the US II group, GI and PD increased. Although marginal bone level was lower in the US II group in all evaluation periods, the changes between the periods were not statistically significant(p>0.05). In each period, periodontal parameters were not statistically significant between groups. Conclusion: One year after prosthetic loading, GS II and US II dental implants showed similar periodontal conditions and marginal bone response, and were within the criteria of success.

Keywords

References

  1. Branemark PI, Adell R, Breine U et aL Intra-osseous anchorage of dental prostheses, I. Experimental studies, Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg 1969;3 :81-100 https://doi.org/10.3109/02844316909036699
  2. Esposito M, Grusovin MG, Coulthard P et aL A 5-year follow- up comparative analysis of the efficacy of various osseointegrated dental implant systems: A systematic review of randomized controlled clinical trials, Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2005;20:557-568
  3. Chang M, Wennstrom JL, adman P, Andersson B. Implant supported single-tooth replacements compared to contralateral natural teeth. Crown and soft tissue dimensions. Clin Oral implants Res 1999; I0: 185-194 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1999.100301.x
  4. Hansson S. The implant neck: Smooth or provided with retention elements. A biomechanical approach. Clin Oral Implants Res 1999; 10:394-405 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1999.100506.x
  5. Abrahamsson I, Berglundh T. Tissue characteristics at microthreaded implants: An experimental study in dogs. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2006;8:107-113 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8208.2006.00016.x
  6. Palmer RM, Palmer PJ, Smith RJ. A 5-year prospective study of Astra single tooth implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 2000; II : 179-182 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2000.tb00012.x
  7. Lee DW, Choi YS, Park KH et al. Effect of microthread on the maintenance of marginal bone level: A 3-year prospective study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2007; 18:465-470 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2007.01302.x
  8. Berglundh T, Persson L, Klinge B. A systematic review of the incidence of biological and technical complications in implant dentistry reported in prospective longitudinal studies of at least 5 years. J Clin Periodontol 2002;29 Suppl 3:197-212; discussion 232-233 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-051X.29.s3.20.x
  9. Valderhaug J, Birkeland JM. Periodontal conditions in patients 5 years following insertion of fixed prostheses. Pocket depth and loss of attachment. J Oral Rehabil 1976;3:237-243 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.1976.tb00949.x
  10. Schroeder A, van del' Zypen E, Stich H, Sutter F. The reactions of bone, connective tissue, and epithelium to endosteal implants with titanium-sprayed surfaces. J Maxillofac Surg 1981 ;9: 15-25 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-0503(81)80007-0
  11. Cochran DL, Hermann JS, Schenk RK et al. Biologic width around titanium implants. A histomctric analysis of the implanto-gingival junction around unloaded and loaded non submerged implants in the canine mandible. Periodontol 1997;68: 186-198 https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1997.68.2.186
  12. Mombelli A, van Oosten MA, Schurch E,Jr, Land NP. The microbiota associated with successful or failing osseointegrated titanium implants. Oral Microbiol Immunol 1987;2: 145-151 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-302X.1987.tb00298.x
  13. Mombelli A, Lang NP. Clinical parameters for the evaluation of dental implants. Periodontol 2000 1994;4:81-86 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0757.1994.tb00008.x
  14. Astrand P, Engquist B, Dahlgren S, et al. Astra tech and branemark system implants: A prospective 5-year comparative study. results after one year. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 1999; 1: 17-26 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8208.1999.tb00087.x
  15. Engquist B, Astrand P, Dahlgren S et al. Marginal bone reaction to oral implants: A prospective comparative study of astra tech and branemark system implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 2002;13:30-37 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2002.130103.x
  16. Schou S, Holmstrup P, Hjorting-Hansell E, Lang NP. Plaque-induced marginal tissue reactions of osseointegrated oral implants: A review of the literature. Clin Oral Implants Res 1992;3:149-161 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1992.030401.x
  17. Quirynen M, van Steenberghe D, Jacobs R et al. The reliability of pocket probing around scre,v-type implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 1991;2:186-192 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1991.020405.x
  18. Bengazi F, Wennstrom JL, Lekholm U. Recession of the soft tissue margin at oral implants. A 2-year longitudinal prospective study. Clin Oral Implants Res 1996;7:303-310 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1996.070401.x
  19. Adell R, Lekholll1 U, RockIer 13, et al. Marginal tissue reactions at osseo integrated titanium fixtures (I). A 3-year longitudinal prospective study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1986; 15:39-52 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-9785(86)80010-2
  20. Quirynen M, Naert I, van Steenberghe D. Fixture design and overload influence marginal bone loss and fixture success in the Branemark system. Clin Oral Implants Res 1992;3: I 04-111 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1992.030302.x
  21. Engquist B, Nilson H, Astrand P. Single-tooth replacement by osseointegrated branemark implants. A retrospective study of 82 implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 1995;6: 238-245 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1995.060407.x
  22. Oh TJ, YOOIl J, Misch CE, Wang HL. The causes of early implant bone loss: Myth or science? J Periodontol 2002;73: 322-333 https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2002.73.3.322
  23. Jung YC, Han CH, Lee KW. A I-year radiographic evaluation of marginal bone around dental implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1996; II :811-818
  24. Astrand P, Engquist B, Dahlgren S et al. Astra tech and Branemark system implants: A 5-year prospective study of marginal bOlle reactions. Clin Oral Implants Res 2004; 15: 413-420 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2004.01028.x
  25. Engquist B, Astrand P, Dahlgren S, et a!. Marginal bone reaction to oral implants: A prospective comparative study of Astra tech and Branemark system implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 2002;13:30-37 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2002.130103.x
  26. Alomrani AN, Hermann JS, Jones AA, et al. The etIeet of a machined collar on coronal hard tissue around titanium implants: A radiographic study in the canine mandible. lnt J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2005;20:677-686
  27. Broggini N, McManus LM, Hermann JS et al. Peri-implant inflammation defined by the implant-abutment interface. J Dent Res 2006;85:473-478 https://doi.org/10.1177/154405910608500515
  28. Quirynen M, Bollen CM, Eyssen H, van Steenberghe D. 36 Microbial penetration along the implant components of the Branemark system. an in vitro study. Clin Oral Implants Res 1994;5:239-244 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1994.050407.x
  29. Albrektsson T, Zarb G, Worthington P, Eriksson AR. The long-term efficacy of currently used dental implants: A review and proposed criteria of success. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1986;1:11-25