Journal of Periodontal and Implant Science

Korean Academy of Periodontology (대한치주과학회)
권호 표지

Effects of non-carious cervical lesions and class V restorations on periodontal conditions

비우식성 치경부 병소와 5급 와동 수복물이 치주조직에 미치는 영향

  • Kim, Hyun-Joo (Department of Periodontology, School of Dentistry, Pusan National University) ;
  • Kim, Seong-Jo (Department of Periodontology, School of Dentistry, Pusan National University) ;
  • Choi, Jeom-Il (Department of Periodontology, School of Dentistry, Pusan National University) ;
  • Lee, Ju-Youn (Department of Periodontology, School of Dentistry, Pusan National University)
  • 김현주 (부산대학교 치의학전문대학원 치주과학교실) ;
  • 김성조 (부산대학교 치의학전문대학원 치주과학교실) ;
  • 최점일 (부산대학교 치의학전문대학원 치주과학교실) ;
  • 이주연 (부산대학교 치의학전문대학원 치주과학교실)
  • Published : 2009.03.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Purpose: The non-carious cervical lesion(NCCL) is a loss of tooth structure at the neck of affected teeth that is unrelated to tooth caries. The reported prevalence of NCCL varies from 5% to 85%. Prevalence and severity of lesions have been found to increase with age. They are becoming more significant as people live longer and become more aware of the importance of oral health. The purposes of this study were first, to examine the periodontal conditions associated with NCCL, and second, to investigate the clinical effects of class V restorations of NCCL on periodontal tissues. Materials and methods: The sample size was 982 teeth of 50 subjects(25 male, mean age $52{\pm}7$) who were seen at the Department of Periodontology, Pusan National University Hospital. At the baseline examination, clinical periodontal parameters were measured. After the initial examination, 24 patients who were absent from hypersensitivity were selected. The teeth with NCCL were randomly divided into the test and control groups. The teeth in the test group were restored with flowable resin; the control teeth were not restored. Six months later, the clinical examinations were repeated. The data were analyzed using the SPSS program. Results: The results were as follows: 1) NCCL occurred on 45.8% of examined teeth. The percentage of affected teeth was higher in maxillary and premolar teeth. 2) The shallow saucer type was the most common. 3) Teeth with NCCL had more gingival recession, lower attachment level, and higher incidences of bleeding on probing(BOP) and plaque than NCCL-free teeth. 4) Six months later, gingival recession, attachment level, the percentages of BOP and plaque in the test group were lower than in the control group(p<0.05). Conclusion: NCCLs were more found in maxillary teeth, especially in premolar teeth. The results suggest that the restoration of NCCL could affect some periodontal parameters favorably.

Keywords

References

  1. Osborne-Smith KL, Burke FJ, Wilson NH. The aetiology of the non-carious cervical lesion. Int Dent J 1999;49: 139-143 https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1875-595X.1999.tb00898.x
  2. Aw TC, Lepe X, Johnson GH, Mancl L. Characteristics of noncarious cervical lesions. A clinical investigation. J Am Dent Assoc 2002; 133 :725-733 https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.2002.0268
  3. Levitch LC, Bader JD, Shugars DA, Heymann HO. Non-carious cervical lesions. J Dent 1994;22:195-207 https://doi.org/10.1016/0300-5712(94)90107-4
  4. Sangnes G, Gjermo P. Prevalence of oral soft tissue and hard tissue lesions related to mechanical tooth cleansing procedures. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1976;4:77-83 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0528.1976.tb01607.x
  5. Hong FL, Nu ZY, Xie XM. Clinical classification and therapeutic design of dental cervical abrasion. Gerodontics 1988;4:101-103
  6. Donachie MA, Walls A W. Assessment of tooth wear in an ageing population. J Dent 1995;23:157-164 https://doi.org/10.1016/0300-5712(95)93573-K
  7. Borcic J, Anic I, Urek MM, Ferreri S. The prevalence of non-carious cervical lesion in permanent dentition. J Oral Rehabil 2004;31:117-123 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0305-182X.2003.01223.x
  8. Bader JD, McClure F, Scurria MS, Shugars DA, Heymann HO. Case-control study of non carious cervical lesions. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1996;24:286-291
  9. Piotrowski BT, Gillette WB, Hancock EB. Examining the prevalence and characteristics of abfraction like cervical lesions in a population of U.S. verterans. J Am Dent Assoc 2001; 132; 1694-1701 https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.2001.0122
  10. Tyas MJ. The class V lesion - aetiology and restoration. Aust Dent J 1995;40(3): 197 -170 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1834-7819.1995.tb05637.x
  11. Cuenin M, Clem B. Periodontal and restorative treatment of class V lesion. Gen Dent 1993;41 :252-254
  12. Litonjua LA, Andreana S, Bush PJ, Tobias TS. Noncarious cervical lesions and abfractions; are-revaluation. J Am Dent Assoc 2003;134:845-850 https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.2003.0282
  13. Grippo JO. Noncarious cervical lesions: The decision to ignore or restore. J Esthet Dent 1992;4:55-64 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8240.1992.tb00721.x
  14. Paolantonio M, D'ercole S, Perinetti G et al. Clinical and microbiological effcct of different restorative materials on the periodontal tissue adjacent to subgingival class V restorations. J Clin eriodontol 2004;31 :200-207 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0303-6979.2004.00472.x
  15. Larato DC. Influence of a composite resin restoration on the gingiva. J Prosthet Dent 1972;28:402-404 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(72)90241-7
  16. Willershausen B, Kottgen C, Ernst CPo The influence of restorative materials on marginal gingiva. Eur J Med Res 2001;6:433-439
  17. van Dijken JW, Sjostrom S, Wing K. The effect of different types of composite resin filling on marginal gingiva. J Clin Periodontol 1987;14:185-189 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.1987.tb00965.x
  18. Blank LW. Caffesse RG, Charbeneau GT. The gingival response to well-finished composite resin restorations. J Prosthet Dent 1979;42:626-632 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(79)90192-6
  19. Seibert J, Lindhe J. Esthetics and periodontal therapy. In: Linde J. Textbook of clinical periodontology. 2nd edition: Copenhagen: Munksgaard; 1989:477-514
  20. Schatzle M, Lang NP, Anerud A et al. The influence of margins of restorations on the periodontal tissues over 26 ycrs. J Clin Periodontol 2000;27:57-64
  21. Jansson L, Blomster S, Forsgardh A et al. lnteractory effect between marginal plaque and subgingival proximal restorations on periodontal pocket depth. Swed Dent J 1997;21: 77-83
  22. Goerzo I, Newman HN, Strahan 10. Amalgam restorations, plaque removal and periodontal health. J Clin Periodontol 1979;6:98-105 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.1979.tb02188.x
  23. Laurell L, Rylander H, Pettersson B. The effect of different levels of polishing of amalgam restorations on the plaque retention and gingival inflammation. Swcd Dent J 1983:7:45-53