Journal of Korean Physical Therapy Science (대한물리치료과학회지)
- Volume 16 Issue 2
- /
- Pages.27-37
- /
- 2009
- /
- 2733-6441(pISSN)
- /
- 2733-645X(eISSN)
The Impacts of General Coordination Manipulation Approach Models on the University Student's Gait, Which is Based on the Flexion or Extension Types of Upper and Lower Body
상.하체의 굽힘.폄 양상에 따른 전신조정술 접근 모형이 대학생의 보행에 미치는 영향
- Moon, Sang-Eun (Dept. of Physical Therapy, Masan University) ;
- Kim, Mi-Hwa (The Society of GCM) ;
- Ju, Wang-Suck (Wang Suck Oriental Clinic) ;
- Lee, Su-Hong (Jung San Oriental Clinic) ;
- Oh, Chang-Sun (Oh Chang Sun Oriental Clinic) ;
- Choi, Min-Ho (Boram Oriental Clinic) ;
- Jung, Woong-Chae (Dong Eui Oriental Clinic)
- 문상은 (마산대학 물리치료과) ;
- 김미화 (GCM학회) ;
- 주왕석 (왕석한의원) ;
- 이수홍 (중산한의원) ;
- 오창선 (오창선한의원) ;
- 최민호 (보람한의원) ;
- 정웅채 (동의한의원)
- Received : 2009.05.10
- Accepted : 2009.06.11
- Published : 2009.06.30
Abstract
Background: The musculoskeletal disorders with asymmetrical gait on the whole body are the most common. This study was designed to analyze that General Coordinative Manipulation Intervention Models would affect the balanced restoration of asymmetrical gait. Methods: 68 healthy volunteers(1st hypothesis: 46, 2nd hypothesis 22) participated in the two GCM intervention models, which have performed 2 times a week for 3 weeks. Digital Camera was used to measure the gait, and measurements were performed before and after the application of the each intervention model. Repeated measured ANOVA was used to determine a statistical significance. Results: The outcome of examining hypothesis is as follows: 1. The 1st hypothesis : GCM Intervention based on the coordinating the flexion type of upper body and the extension type of lower body will improve in the balanced restoration of asymmetrical gait because it offers a clear direction for treatment(p<.05). 2. The 2nd hypothesis: GCM Intervention based on the coordinating the flexion type of lower body and the extension type of upper body will improve in the balanced restoration of asymmetrical gait because it offers a clear direction for treatment(p<.05). Conclusion: GCM intervention programs on the two hypothesis groups have effects on the balanced restoration of asymmetrical gait(p<.05).