DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

미성숙 미니돼지에서 방사선과 초음파를 이용한 복부장기의 평가

Evaluation of Normal Abdominal Organs by Diagnostic Imaging in the Premature Miniature Pig

  • 장진화 (서울대학교 수의과대학 영상의학과) ;
  • 정주현 (서울대학교 수의과대학 영상의학과) ;
  • 오선경 (서울대학교 수의과대학 영상의학과) ;
  • 최민철 (서울대학교 수의과대학 영상의학과)
  • Chang, Jin-Hwa (Department of Medical Imaging, College of Veterinary Medicine, Seoul National University) ;
  • Jung, Joo-Hyun (Department of Medical Imaging, College of Veterinary Medicine, Seoul National University) ;
  • Oh, Sun-Kyoung (Department of Medical Imaging, College of Veterinary Medicine, Seoul National University) ;
  • Choi, Min-Cheol (Department of Medical Imaging, College of Veterinary Medicine, Seoul National University)
  • 발행 : 2009.03.31

초록

4, 8, 12, 20 주령의 미성숙 미니돼지에서 방사선과 초음파를 이용하여 복부 주요 장기의 형태학적 특징을 살펴보았다. 방사선 검사는 전반적인 장기의 형태를 확인하는 데 이용되는 가장 기본적이고 단순한 방법이다. 기본 복부방사선 사진에서 이용되는 평가해야 할 항목들은 우선 전반적인 복부세부음영의 정도, 간, 위, 비장, 신장, 방광, 장들의 위치, 크기, 형태, 변연, 후복강 평가이다. 초음파 검사는 이러한 주요 장기들의 내부 실질을 평가하는 데 주로 사용된다. 미니돼지는 개와 고양이와 비교했을 때 유사한 소견을 가진 것을 확인하였다.

This report describes the normal radiographic and ultrasonographic morphological features of premature minipigs at 4, 8, 12 and 20 weeks of age. Radiographic examination is a simple diagnostic method used to identify the general morphologic state of major organs and their adjacent structures, and to assess the presence of abnormalities. The parameters for evaluation in plain abdominal radiographs are the degree of diffuse serosal margin details, extent of visualization of each organ, their size, shape, and contour, locations of main organs - such as the liver, stomach, spleen, kidneys, urinary bladder - the distribution of the intestines, and assessment of the retroperitoneal space and its contents. Ultrasonographic examinations are used to investigate their internal condition. The parameters for evaluation in abdominal ultrasonography are echogenicity, echotexture, and size and shape of the main organs such as the liver, spleen, kidney, urinary bladder and gastrointestinal tract. Minipigs had similar findings compared to dogs or cats.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Dooldeniya, M. and A. Warrens. 2003. Xenotransplantation: where are we today? J. R. Soc. Med. 96, 111-117 https://doi.org/10.1258/jrsm.96.3.111
  2. French, A. J., J. L. Greenstein, B. E. Loveland, and P. S. Mountford. 1998. Current and future prospects for xenotransplantation. Reprod. Fertil. Dev. 10, 683-696 https://doi.org/10.1071/RD98112
  3. Gray, C. W., M. Brush, and C. C. Beck. 1974. Clinical experience using CI-744 in chemical restraint and anesthesia of exotic specimens. J. Zoo. Anim. Med. 5, 12-21 https://doi.org/10.2307/20094264
  4. John C. T., J. T. William, and G. J. Benson. 1996. Lumb & Jones' Veterinary Anesthesia, pp. 273-274, 3rd eds., Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore, MD
  5. Sack, W. O. 1982. Essentials of pig anatomy pp. 29-45,1st ed., Cornell University, Ithaca, NY
  6. Stephen, P. S. 1997. Genetically modified animal organs for human transplantation. World J. Surg. 21, 939-942 https://doi.org/10.1007/s002689900330
  7. Thrall, D. E. 2007. Textbook of veterinary diagnostic radiology, pp. 750-769, 4th eds., Saunders, Philadelphia, PA
  8. Vodicka, P., K. Jr. Smetana, B. Dvorankova, T. Emerick, Y. Z. Xu, J. Ourednik, V. Ourednik, and J. Motlik. 2000. The miniaturepig as an animal model in biomedical research. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1049, 161-171 https://doi.org/10.1196/annals.1334.015

피인용 문헌

  1. Establishment of normal reference of radiological morphology of renal artery in mini-pigs by renal angiography vol.56, pp.3, 2016, https://doi.org/10.14405/kjvr.2016.56.3.177