국내에 서식하는 잉어과 어류의 Passive integrated transponder (PIT) tag 적용에 따른 생존율 평가

Survival Rate of the Korean Cyprinidae Subject to Passive Integrated Transponder (PIT) Tagging

  • Yoon, Ju-Duk (Department of Biology, Pusan National University) ;
  • Jang, Min-Ho (Department of Biology Education, Kongju National University)
  • 발행 : 2009.03.31

초록

국내에 서식하는 5종의 담수 잉어과 어류(참갈겨니, 피라미, 누치, 납자루, 끄리) 173개체를 대상으로 PIT 태그를 체내 삽입 후, 30일 간 매일 생존율을 파악하여 태그의 적용성과 활용 가능성을 타진하였다. 생존율 테스트 결과, 참갈겨니가 가장 높은 생존율을, 피라미가 가장 낮은 생존율을 보였으며, 전반적으로 개체의 전장이 길수록 생존 기간도 긴 것으로 나타났다. 초기 사망률은 외과적 수술과정에서 내부 장기의 손상 등과 관련이 있는 것으로 보였다. 본 실험결과 피라미를 제외한 국내에 서식하고 있는 소형 담수어류에도 PIT 태그 적용이 가능할 것으로 사료되며, 종에 따라 다소 차이는 있으나, PIT 태그의 야외현장 적용을 위해서는 전장 150mm의 개체를 사용하는 것이 적절할 것으로 판단된다.

The survival rate of PIT tagged fish was investigated for five Korean Cyprindae fish species, Acheilognathus lanceolatus (n=18, total length : $92.5{\pm}13.1mm$; body weight : $9.6{\pm}4.3g$), Hemibarbus labeo (n=28, TL : $220{\pm}74.4mm$; BW : $91.8{\pm}76.2g$), Zacco koreanus (n=13, TL : $116.5{\pm}23.8mm$; BW : $13.6{\pm}10.6g$), Zacco platypus (n=108, TL : $100.6{\pm}17.8mm$; BW: $8.7{\pm}4.8g$), Opsariichthys uncirostris amurensis (n=6, TL : $161.8{\pm}26.3mm$; BW : $27.5{\pm}18.3g$) with respect to applicability and effectiveness of PIT tagging. The survival rate were daily checked for 30 days. The survival rate was the highest and lowest for Z. koreanus and Z. platypus, respectively. The survival days were greater as fish total length increased. Based on these results, PIT tagging is not effective for Z. platypus, while PIT tagging for fish>150 mm was effect for field research.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. 장민호, 윤주덕, 도윤호, 주기재. 2007. 소형담수 잉어과 어류의 PIT tag 적용을 위한 생존률 평가. 한국육수학회지 19(4): 371-377
  2. Bubb, D.H., M.C. Lucas, T.J. Thom and P. Rycroft. 2002. The potential use of PIT telemetry for identifying and tracking crayfish in their natural environment. Hydrobiologia 483: 225-230 https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021352217332
  3. Jang, M.H., K. Ha, D.H. Bubb and M.C. Lucas. 2004. Habitat availability, distribution and abundance of spawning lampreys in the Yorkshire Derwent system. Report of a joint project by the University of Durham with the Environment Agency, 71pp
  4. Jang, M.H. and M.C. Lucas. 2005. Reproductive ecology of the river lamprey. J. Fish Biol. 66: 499-512 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0022-1112.2005.00618.x
  5. Jang, M.H., G.I. Cho and G.J. Joo. 2005. The impact of unregulated fishing on the size distribution of a fish population in a temperate upland stream pool. J. Freshwater Ecol. 20: 191-193 https://doi.org/10.1080/02705060.2005.9664952
  6. Lucas, M.C. and E. Baras. 2001. Migration of Freshwater Fishes. Blackwell Science, Oxford, UK, 352pp
  7. Lucas, M.C., D.H. Bubb, M.-H. Jang, K. Ha and J.E.G. Masters. 2009. Availability of and access to critical habitats in regulated rivers: effects of low-head barriers on threatened lampreys. Freshwater Biol. 54: 621-634 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2427.2008.02136.x
  8. Morhardt, J.E., D. Bisher, C.I. Handlin and S.D. Mulder. 2000. A portable system for reading large PIT tags from wild trout. N. Am. J. Fish. Manag. 20: 276-283 https://doi.org/10.1577/1548-8675(2000)020<0276:APSFRL>2.0.CO;2
  9. Roussel, J.M., A. Haro and R.A. Cunjak. 2000. Field-test of a new method for tracking small fishes in shallow rivers using passive integrated transponder (PIT) technology. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 57: 1326-1329 https://doi.org/10.1139/cjfas-57-7-1326
  10. Zydlewski, G.B., A. Harom K.G. Whalen and S.D. McCormick. 2001. Performance of stationary and portable passive transponder detection systems for monitoring fish movements. J. Fish Biol. 58: 1471-1475 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8649.2001.tb02302.x