시화 반월 고습지와 저습지의 갈대 부착규조 군집 구조

Structure of Epiphytic Diatom Communities at the Banwoul High and Low Wetlands in the Shiwha Constructed Wetland

  • 김용재 (대진대학교 생명과학과)
  • 발행 : 2009.03.31

초록

The Shihwa constructed wetland was established for the treatment of severely poluted water from Banwoul, Donghwa and Samhwa streams. This study was focused on investigating the structure of epiphytic diatom communities on reed (Phragmites communis) planting area at Banwoul high wetland (3 stations) and low wetland (3 stations) from March to October 2005. The concentration of T-N of inlet stations from the streams were decreased by flowed through the wetland, but the concentration of T-P were increased at outflow part. Epiphytic diatoms on the reed were a total 109 taxa which were composed of 103 species, 5 varieties, 1 unidentified species. The standing crops were rapidly decreasing tendency from spring to autumn but chlorophyll-a concentration were showed a very irregulated changes. Dominant species were 6 taxa which were Achnanthes minutissima in the early investigation, and were changed to the genus Navicula and the genus Nitzschia in the summer. DAIpo were ranged the values of $20.2{\sim}51$, which were mesosaprobic states at the high wetland and ranged the values of $12.4{\sim}52$, which were polysaprobic to mesosaprobic states at the low wetland. TDI were ranged the values of $28.8{\sim}94.5$, which were oligotrophic to eutrophic state at the high wetland and ranged the values of $33.3{\sim}89.7$ which were mesotrophic to eutrophic states at the low wetland. The healthy assessment (DAIpo and TDI) of water ecosystem were showed clean-bad from spring to autumn. These epiphytic diatom communities were determinated by the biological factor such as the growth of reed and the physical factors such as water temperature, light penetration and SS and so on.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. 김용재. 1999. 부착규조에 의한 포천천의 수질평가. 한국육수학회지 32: 135-140
  2. 김용재. 2001. 신천의 부착규조 군집과 유기오탁 판정. 한국육수학회지 34: 199-205
  3. 김용재. 2005. 하천수(반월천, 동화천, 삼화천)의 시화인공습지 관류에 따른 개방수에서 식물 플랑크톤 군집 동태. 한국육수학회지 38: 403-411
  4. 김용재. 2007. 도시화 정도에 따른 포천천과 영평천의 돌부착규조 군집의 변화. 한국육수학회지 40: 468-480
  5. 김용재, 김한순. 2006. 시화인공습지 완공 초기에 갈대 부착조류 군집의 변화. 한국육수학회지 39: 402-412
  6. 이정호, 정 준. 1993. 광천(경상북도 울진군)의 부착규조 군집구조. 한국육수학회지 26: 223-233
  7. 이정호. 1998. 낙동강의 부착규조와 유기오탁지수(DAIpo). 한국육수학회지 31: 38-44
  8. 정 준, 최재신, 이정호. 1993. 부착규조 군집의 유기오탁지수(DAIpo)에 의한 금호강의 수질 평가. 환경생물 11: 43-58
  9. Adamus, P.R. and L.T. Stockwell. 1983. A method for wetland functional assessment: VII. 1. Critical review and evaluation concepts. US Dept. Trnasportation, Fedral Highway Administration. Report FHWA IP: p. 82-83
  10. Braakhekke, W.G. and M. Marchand. 1987. Wetlands: The community's wealth. European Environment Bureau. Brussels. 24p
  11. Feio, M.J., S.F.P. Almeida, S.C. Craveiro and A.J. Calado. 2009. A comparison between biotic indices and predictive models in stream water quality assessment based on benthic diatom communities. Ecological Indicator 9: 497-507 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2008.07.001
  12. Forsberg, C. and S.O. Ryding. Eutrophication parameter and trophic state indices IN 30 Swedish receiving lakes. Arch. Hydrobiol. 89: 189-207
  13. Ghosh, D. and S. Sen. 1987 Ecological history of Calcutta's wetland conversion. Environmental Conservation 14: 219-226 https://doi.org/10.1017/S0376892900016416
  14. Hendey, N.I. 1979. The permanganate method for cleaning freshly gathered diatoms, Microscopy 32: 423-426
  15. Heyman, J.R. 1988. Self-Financed Re- source Management: A direct approach to maintaining marine biological diversity, Paper presented at workshop on economics, IUCN General assembly, 4-5 Feb. 1988, Costa Rica, p. 234-235
  16. Hill, B.H., A.T. Herlihy, P.R. Kaufmann, R.J. Srevenson, F.H. McCormick and C.B. Johnson. 2000. Use of periphyton assemblage data as an index of biotic integrity. J. N. Am. Benthol Soc. 19: 50-67 https://doi.org/10.2307/1468281
  17. Hill, B.H., A.T. Herlihy, P.R. Kaufmann, S.J. DeCelles and M.A. Vander Borgh. 2003. Assessment of streams of the eastern United States using a periphyton index of biotic integrity. Ecological Indicator 2: 325-338 https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-160X(02)00062-6
  18. Horn, A.J. and C.R. Goldman. 1994. Limnology, McGraw-Hill, Inc., New York, 115p
  19. Jun, M.S., Watanabe, Y. and B.C. Kim, 1998. The effects of dilution rate and temperature on phytoplankton growth in stream water, Korean Journal of Limnology 31, 328-336. (in Korean)
  20. Kadlec, R.H. and R.L. Knight. 1996. Treatment wetlands, Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, 893p
  21. Kelly, M.G., C. Adams, A.C. Graves, J. Jamieson, J. Krokowski, E.B. Lycett. J. Murray-Bligh, S. Pritchard and C. Wilkins. 2001. The trophic diatom index: a user's manual. (Revised ed.). R & D Technical Report E2/TR2
  22. Lange-Bertalot, H. 1979. Pollution tolerance of diatoms as a criterion for water quality estimation. Nova Hed. Beih. 64: 285-304
  23. Lougheed, V.L. and P. Chow-Fraser. 2002. Development and use of a zooplankton index of wetland quality in the Laurentian Great Lakes basin. Ecol. Appl. 175: 227-243
  24. Mitsch, W. and J.G. Gosselink, 2000. Wetlands. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York. NY. 920p
  25. Patrick, R. 1948. Factors affecting the distribution of diatoms. Bot. Rev. 14: 473-524 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02861575
  26. Phiri, C., J. Day, M. Chimbari and E. Dhlomo. 2007. Epiphytic diatoms associated with a submerged macrophyte, Vallisnria aethiopica, in the shallow marginal areas of Sanyati Basin (Lake Kariba): a preliminary assessment of their use as biomonitoring tools. Aquat. Ecol. 41: 169- 181 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10452-006-9073-z
  27. Poulicova, A., M. Duchoslaw and M. Dokulil. 2004. Littoral diatom assemblages as bioindicators of lake trophic status: a case study from perialpine lakes in Austria. Eur. J. Phycol. 99: 143-152
  28. Shannon, C.E. and W. Weaver. 1963. The Mathematical theory of communication. Illinois Univ. Press, Urbana, 177p
  29. Shimpson, E.H. 1949. Measurement of diversity. Nature 163: 1-688 https://doi.org/10.1038/163001a0
  30. Smith, P.G.R., V. Glooschenko and D.A. Hagen. 1991. Coastal wetlands of three Canadian Great Lakes: inventory, conservation initiatives and patterns of variation. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 48: 1581-1594 https://doi.org/10.1139/f91-187
  31. Squires, L.E., S.R. Rushforth and J.D. Brotherson. 1979. Algal response to a thermal effluent: study of a power sration on the Provo River, Utah, USA. Hydrobiologia 63: 17-32 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00021013
  32. Sudhakar, G., B. Jyothi and V. Venkateswarlu, 1994. Role of diatoms as indicators of pollution gradients. Envir. Monit. and Assess. 33: 85-99 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00548591
  33. Timms, R.M. and B. Moss. 1984. Prevention of growth of potentially dense phytoplankton population by zooplanktivorous fish, in a shallow wetland ecosystem. Limnol. Oceanogr. 29: 472-486 https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.1984.29.3.0472
  34. U.S. EPA. 1974. "An approach to a relative trophic index system for classifying lakes and reservior" The National Eutrophication Survey Work. Pap. 24, Pacific Northwest Envir. Res. Lab. Corvallis
  35. Vollenweider, R.A. 1979. Das N$\ddot{a}$hrstoffbelastungskonzept als Grundlag f$\ddot{u}$r den externen Eingriff in den Eutrophilerungsprozess stehender Gew$\ddot{a}$sser und Talsperren. Z. Wasser-u. Abwasser-Forschung. 12: 46-56
  36. Watanabe, T. and K. Asai. 1990. Numerical simulationdiatoms assemblage of organic pollution in stream and lakes. Rev. Inq. and Res. 52: 99-139