Asia pacific journal of information systems

The Korea Society of Management Information Systems (한국경영정보학회)
권호 표지

A Study on EC Acceptance of Virtual Community Users

가상 공동체 사용자의 전자상거래 수용에 대한 연구

  • Published : 2009.03.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Virtual community(VC) will increasingly be organized as commercial enterprises, with the objective of earning an attractive financial return by providing members with valuable resources and environment. For example, Cyworld.com in Korea uses several community services to enable customers of Cyworld to take control of their own value as potential purchasers of products and services. Although initial adoption is important for online network service success, it does not necessarily result in the desired managerial performance unless the initial usage is continuously related to the continuous usage and purchase. Particularly, the customer who receives relevant online services and is well equipped with online network services, will trust the online service provider and perceive less risk and experience more activities such as continuous usage and purchase. Thus, how to promote continued online service usage or, alternatively, how to prevent discontinuance is a critical issue for VC service providers to consider. By aggregating a wide range of information and online environments for customers and providing trust to its members, the service providers of virtual communities help to reduce the perceived risk of continuous usage and purchase. Drill down, online service managers realize that achieving strong and sustained customers who continuously use online service and purchase on it is crucial. Therefore, the research into this online service continuance will identify the relationship between the initial usage and the continuous usage and purchase. The research of continuous usage or post adoption has recently emerged as an important issue in the IS literature. Individuals' information systems(IS) continuous usage decisions are congruent with consumers' repeat purchase decisions. The TAM(Technology Acceptance Model) paradigm has been strongly confirmed across a wide range from product purchase on EC to online service usage contexts. The analysis of IS usage based on TAM has proven to be successful across almost online service contexts. However, most of previous studies have focused on only an area (i.e., VC or EC). Just little research has tried to analyze the relationship between VC and EC. The effect of some factors on user intention, captured through several theories such as TAM, has been demonstrated. Yet, few studies have explored the salient relationships of VC users' EC acceptance. To fill this gap between VC and EC research, this paper attempts to develop a research model that extends the TAM perspective in view of the additional contributions of trust in the service provider and trust in members on some factors that affect EC and VC adoption. In this extension, we applied the TAM-to-TAM(T2T) model, and analyzed the transfer effect of trust between these two TAMs. The research model was empirically tested on the context of a social network service. The model was to extend TAM with the trust concept for the virtual community environment from the perspective of tasks. By building an extended model of TAM and examining the relationships between trust and the existing variables of TAM, it is aimed to explain a user's continuous intention to use VC and purchase on EC. The unit of analysis in this paper is an individual user of a virtual community. The population of interest is the individual with the experiences in virtual community. The data for this paper was made available via a Web survey of VC users. In total, 281 cases were gathered for about one week, but there were some missing values in the sample and there were some inappropriate cases. Thus, only 248 cases were finally analyzed. We chose the structural equation analysis to test the hypotheses and it is better suited for explaining complex relationships than the other methods. In this test, AMOS was used to test the Structural Equation Model (SEM). Noticeable results have been found in the T2T model regarding the factors affecting the intention to use of virtual community and loyalty. Our result showed that trust transfer plays a key role in forming the two adoption beliefs. Overall, this study preliminarily confirms the salience of trust transfer in online service.

Keywords

References

  1. Ba, S. and Pavlou, A.P., "Evidence of the Effect of Trust Building Technology in Electronic Markets: Price Premiums and Buyer Behavior", MIS Quarterly, Vol. 2, No. 3, 2002, pp. 243-268
  2. Bhattacherjee A., "Understanding information systems continuance: An expectation confirmation model," MIS Quarterly, Vol. 25, No. 3, 2001, pp. 351-370 https://doi.org/10.2307/3250921
  3. Baier, A., "Trust and Antitrust", Ethics, Vol.96, No. 2, 1986, pp. 231-260 https://doi.org/10.1086/292745
  4. B$\acute{e}$langer, F. and Carter, L., "Trust and Risk in e-government adoption", Joumal of Strategic Information Systems, Vol. 17, 2008 pp. 165-176 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2007.12.002
  5. Chau，P.Y.K., "Reexamining a Model for Evaluating Information Center Success Using a Structural Equation Modeling Approach",Decision Sciences, Vol. 28, 1998, pp. 309-334 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.1997.tb01313.x
  6. Chin，W.W., Gopal, A., and Salisbury, W.D., "Advancing the Theory of Adaptive Structuration: The Development of a Scale to Measure Faithfulness of Appropriation",Information Systems Research, Vol. 8, No. 4, 1997, pp. 342-367 https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.8.4.342
  7. Churchill， G.A. and Surprenant, C., "An investigation into the determinants of customer satisfaction," Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 19, No. 4, 1982, pp. 491-504 https://doi.org/10.2307/3151722
  8. Davis，F.D., A Technology Acceptance Model for Empirically Testing New End-User Information Systems: Theory and Results, Doctoral Dissertation, Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1986
  9. Davis, F.D., Bagozzi, R.P., and Warshaw, P.R., "User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models," Management Science, Vol. 35, No. 8, 1989, pp. 982-1003 https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.35.8.982
  10. Dayal, S., Landesberg, H., and zeisser， M., "How to Build Trust Online,'' Marketing Managetnent, Vol. 8, No. 3, 1999, pp. 64-66
  11. Doney, P.M. and Cannon, J.P., "An Examination of the Nature of Trust in Buyer-SeIler Relationship", Joumal of Marketing，Vol. 61, No. 2, 1997, pp. 35-51 https://doi.org/10.2307/1251829
  12. Fornell, C. and Larcker, D.F., "Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error", Journal of Marketing Research Vol18, 1981,pp39-50 https://doi.org/10.2307/3151312
  13. Ganesan, S., "Determinants of Long-Term Orientation in Buyer-Seller Relationships", Journal of Marketing, Vol. 58, No. 2, 1994, pp.1-19 https://doi.org/10.2307/1252265
  14. Gefen, D., Karahanna, E., and Straub, D.W., "Trust and TAM in Online Shopping: AnIntegrated Model," MIS Quarterly, Vol. 27,No. 1, 2003, pp. 51-90 https://doi.org/10.2307/30036519
  15. Gerbing, D.W. and Anderson, J.C., "An Updated Paradigm for Scale Development Incorporating Unidimensionality and Its Assessment", Joumal of Marketing Research, Vol. 25, 1988, pp. 186-192 https://doi.org/10.2307/3172650
  16. Grabner-Kr$\ddot{a}$uter，S. and Kaluscha, E.A., "Empirical research in online trust: a review and critical assessment",International Journal of Human Computer Studies, Vol. 58, 2003, pp. 783-812 https://doi.org/10.1016/S1071-5819(03)00043-0
  17. Hagel, J. and Armstrong, A.G., Net gain: Expanding Market Through Virtual Communities, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA., 1997
  18. Han, S.-L. and Sung, H.-S., "Industrial brand value and relationship performance in business markets-A general structural equation model", Industrial Marketing Management, vol.37, 2008, pp807-818 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2008.03.003
  19. Hu, L.T. and Bentler, P.M., "Cutoff Criteria for Fit Indexes in Covariance Structure Analysis: Conventional Criteria Versus New Alternatives," Structural Equation Modeling, Vol. 6, No. 1, 1999， pp. 1-55 https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
  20. Igbaria, M., Guimaraes, T. and Davis， G.B., "Testing the Determinants of Micro computer Usage via a Structural Equation Model," Joumal of Management Information Systems, Vol. 11, No. 4, 1995, pp. 87-114
  21. Jarvenpaa, S.L., Knoll, K., and Leidner, D.E., "Is anybody out there? Antecedents of trust in global virtual teams," Joumal of Management Information Systems, Vol.14, No. 4,1998, pp. 29-64
  22. Jarvenpaa, S.L. and Leidner E.D., "Communication and Trust in Global VirtualTeams," Organization Science, Vol. 10, No. 6,1999, pp. 791-815 https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.10.6.791
  23. Jarvenppa, S.L. and Tractinsky, N., "Consumer Trust in an Internet Store," Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, Vol.5, No. 2, 1999
  24. Kanawattanachai，P. and Yoo, Y.J., "Dynamic Nature of Trust in Virtual Teams," Journal of Strategic Information Systems, Vol. 11, No.3-4, 2002, pp. 187-213 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0963-8687(02)00019-7
  25. Lee, H Y., Ahn, HC, and Han，I.G., "Analysis of Trust in the E-commerce Adoption," Proceedings of the 39th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2006 https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2006.61
  26. Lee, J., Kim, I., and Chung, K., "Affecting Factors on Commercialization of Virtual Community: The Perspective of Purchase Intention," The Journal of MIS Research, Vol.14, No. 2, 2004, pp. 151-172
  27. Limayem, M., Hirt, S.G., and Cheung, C.M. K., "How habit limits the predictive power of intention: The case of information systems continuance,'' MIS Quarterly, Vol. 31, No. 4, 2007, pp. 705-737
  28. Lin, H F., "Determinants of successful virtual communities: contributions from system characteristics and social factors," Information and Management, Vol. 45, 2008, pp. 522-527 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2008.08.002
  29. Mayer, R.C, Davis，J.H, and Schoorman, D., "An Integrative Model of Organizational Trust," The Academy of Management Review, Vol. 20, 1995, pp. 709-734 https://doi.org/10.2307/258792
  30. McKnight, D.H, Cummings, L.L., and Chervany， N.L.,"Initial trust formation innew organizational relationships",The Academy of Management Review, Vol. 23, No. 3, 1998, pp. 473-490 https://doi.org/10.2307/259290
  31. Mcknight, D.H, Choudhury，V., and Kacmar, C., "The Impact of Initial Consumer Trust on Intentions to Transact with a Web Site: a Trust Building Model", Journal of Strategic Information Systems, Vol. 11, No. 3-4, 2002,pp. 297-323 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0963-8687(02)00020-3
  32. Morgan, R.M. and Hunt, S.D., "The commitment- trust theory of relationship marketing", Journal of Marketing, Vol. 58, No. 3, 1994, pp. 20-38 https://doi.org/10.2307/1252308
  33. Oliver, R.L., "Cognitive, affective, and attribute bases of the satisfaction response", Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 20, No. 3, 1993, pp. 418-430 https://doi.org/10.1086/209358
  34. Olsen, R.A., "Trust as risk and the foundation of investment value," The Journal of Socio-Economics, Vol. 37, No. 6, 2008, pp. 2189-2200 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2008.04.009
  35. Parthasarathy, M. and Bhattacherjee， A.,"Understanding post-adoption behavior in the context of online services,"Information Systems Research, Vol. 9, No. 4, 1998, pp. 362-379 https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.9.4.362
  36. Pavlou, P.A. and Fygenson, M., "Understanding and Predicting Electronic Commerce Adoption: An Extension of the Theory of Planned Behavior," MIS Quarterly, Vol. 30, No. 1, 2006, pp. 115-143
  37. Porter, C.E. and Donthu, N., "Cultivating trust and harvesting value in virtual communities," Management Science, Vol. 54, No. 1, 2008, pp. 113-128 https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1070.0765
  38. Preece, J., Online communities: Designing usability, supporting sociability, Wiley, England, 2000
  39. Reynolds, K.E. and Beatty, S.E., "Customer benefits and company consequences of customer- salesperson relationships in retailing", Journal of Retailing, Vol. 75, No. 1, 1999, pp. 11-32 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-4359(99)80002-5
  40. Ridings, C.M., Gefen, D., and Arinze, B., "Some antecedents and effects of trust in virtual communities," Journal of Strategic lnformation Systems, Vol. 11, 2002, pp. 271-295 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0963-8687(02)00021-5
  41. Rotter, J.B., "Generalized expectancies for interpersonal trust," American Psychologist, Vol. 26, 1971， pp. 443-450 https://doi.org/10.1037/h0031464
  42. Rousseau, M.D., Sitkin，B.S., Burt, S.R, and Camerer, C., "Not So Different After All: A Cross DiscipIine View of Trust," The Academy of Management Review, Vol. 23, No. 3, 1998,pp. 393-404 https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.1998.926617
  43. Schoder, D., and Yin, P.L, "Building Firm Trust Online", Communications of ACM, Vol 43, No. 12, 2000, pp.73-79 https://doi.org/10.1145/355112.355127
  44. Sheppard, H.B. and Sherman, M.O., "The Grammars of Trust: A Model and General Implications," The Academy of Management Review, Vol. 23, No. 3, 1998, pp. 422-437 https://doi.org/10.2307/259287
  45. Sirdeshmukh, D., Singh, J., and Sabol, B., "Consumer trust,value, and loyalty in relational exchanges," Journal of Marketing, Vol. 66, No. 1, 2002, pp. 15-37 https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.66.1.15.18449
  46. Straub, D.W., "Validating Instruments in MIS Research," MIS Quarterly, Vol. 13, No. 2, 1989, pp. 147-169 https://doi.org/10.2307/248922
  47. Venkatesh, V. and Davis, F.D., "A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies", Management Science, Vol. 46, February 2000, pp325-343
  48. Wulf, O.K., Odekerken-Schr$\ddot{o}$der, G., Iacobucci, D., "Investments in consumer relationships: A cross-country and cross-industryexploration," Joumal of Marketing, Vol. 65,No. 4, 2001, pp. 33-50 https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.65.4.33.18386