Journal of Internet Computing and Services (인터넷정보학회논문지)

Korean Society for Internet Information (한국인터넷정보학회)
권호 표지

A Study on the Presence Classified by Dimensions through Character Agents on E-Learning

온라인 강의 프로그램의 캐릭터 에이전트를 통한 차원별 프레젠스 연구

  • 권상희 (성균관대학교 신문방송학과) ;
  • 조은정 (성균관대학교 신문방송학과)
  • Published : 2009.12.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study examined factors of presence using the experimental method. The design of this study was to analyze presence through the dimensions of character agents(text, voice, 2D, 3D, reality character dimension and gender) for e-learning platforms that used new technology-based content. There were 232 experimental participants in the study. This study was designed to measure their cognitive awareness of presence by agent dimensions in the first level to measure the presence level in the types of users. The results showed that there were significant correlation between types of users and presence. However there were no statistically significant results on dimensions. In addition, there were significant differences on character gender, voice or non-voice, text or non-text and character dimensions.

본 연구는 실험처치방법을 사용해 프레젠스의 요인들을 측정하기 위한 연구이다. 본 연구의 디자인은 새로운 기술 기반의 콘텐츠를 사용하는 온라인 강의 플랫폼을 위한 에이전트의 차원들(자막, 음성, 2D, 3D, 실사, 캐릭터 성별)을 통해 제시되는 프레젠스 분석에 있다. 이를 위해 232명에게 실험을 실시하였고, 에이전트 차원과 이용자 유형에 의한 프레젠스 인지적 의식을 측정하였다. 연구 결과, 이용자 유형과 프레젠스의 상관관계는 유의미한 것으로 나타났지만, 차원에 대해서는 통계적으로 유의미한 결과가 나타나지 않았다. 그러나 응답자의 성별에 따라 캐릭터의 성별, 음성 여부, 자막 여부, 캐릭터의 차원에서 어느 정도 유의미한 차이가 나타났다.

Keywords

References

  1. 강호수(1995), 지능형 에이전트 인터페이스를 위한 얼굴모델링 및 애니메이션에 관한 연구, 석사학위 논문, 한국과학기술원.
  2. 권중문 & 이상식(2007), 프레즌스(presence) 결정요인에 대한 연구: 미디어 형태와 수용자 특성을중심으로, 언론과학연구, 7(2).
  3. 김영용(2003a), HDTV 프레즌스 미디어의 해석, 서울: 커뮤니케이션북스.
  4. 김은주 & 정선영(2008), 멀티미디어학습에서 캐릭터 에이전트의 활용이 사회적 실재감에 미치는 영향, 교육정보미디어연구, 14(1), pp.73-98.
  5. 김태용(2000), 텔레프레즌스: 개념연구와 연구의의를 중심으로, 경희대학교 사회과학연구소, 커뮤니케이션 연구, 15.
  6. 김태용(2003), 텔레프레즌스 경험 확률에 영향을미치는 수용자 특성에 관한 연구, 한국방송학보,17(2), pp.111-141.
  7. 디지털데일리(2008. 2), 삼성전자 '파브 깐느 450'TV로 3차원 입체영상 즐긴다.
  8. 마정미(2002), 인터렉티브 광고와 효과과정에 관한 연구: 정보통제와 텔레프레즌스를 중심으로,서울: 경희대학교 박사학위 논문.
  9. 맥루한(1964), 박정규 역, 미디어의 이해, 서울: 커뮤니케이션북스.
  10. 박정향(2004), 텔레프레즌스 경험이 인터랙티브 광고 효과에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구, 대구:계명대학교 박사학위 논문.
  11. 박주연(2007), 인터페이스 에이전트와의 상호작용을 통한 친밀성 형성, 한국언론학보, 51(2).
  12. 배진아, 김유진, 전병호(2008), 가상스튜디오를활용한 강의의 정보전달 효과: 배경 템플릿과강의보조자료의 변화를 중심으로, 사이버커뮤니케이션학보, 25(3), pp.41-83.
  13. 안충현 & 이승현(2002), 3DTV 방송기술,http://www.jglory.com/.
  14. 이옥기(2005b), HDTV의 사실성이 프레즌스 경험과 각성, 감동에 미치는 영향 실험연구, 한국방송학보, 20(2).
  15. 이은주(2006), 전자 에이전트의 가상적 성별이소비자 신뢰에 미치는 영향, 마케팅 연구, 21(1).
  16. 정소영(2006), 퍼스널 미디어 환경을 위한 지능형 에이전트 캐릭터 사례분석에 관한 연구:SKT의 ‘1mm'를 중심으로, 한국디자인문화학회, 12(3).
  17. 한건우, 이은경, 이영준(2007), 프로그래밍 교육에서 동료 에이전트가 학업성취도와 자기효능감에 미치는 영향, 한국컴퓨터교육학회 논문지,10(5).
  18. Anthony G. Picciano(2002), Beyond student perceptions: issues of interaction, presence and performance in an online course, JALN, 6(1).
  19. Barfield, W. & Weghorst, S. (1993), The sense of presence within virtual environments: A conceptual framework. Proceedings of the fifth International Conference of Human-Computer Interaction, 699-704, Amsterdam: Elsevier.
  20. Biocca, F.(1997), The cyborg's dilemma: Progressive embodiment in virtual environments, Journal of Computer-Mediated Communicaton, 3(2), www.ascusc.org/jcmc/vol3/issue2/.
  21. Bocker, M. & Muhlbach, L. (1993), Communicative presence in videocommunications, Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 37th Annual Meeting, Santa Monica, CA: The Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, pp.249-253.
  22. Bracken, C. C. (2005),Presence and Image Quality: The Case of High-Definition Television, Media Psychology, 7(2), pp.192-205.
  23. Conati C. & Zhao X.(2004), Building and Evaluating an Intelligent Pedagogical Angent to Improve the Effectiveness of an Educational Game, International Conference on Intelligent Use Interfaces, pp.6-13.
  24. Ellis, J. (1992),Visible Fictions: Cinema: Television: Video, London: Routledge.
  25. Freeman & Avons(2000), Focus group exploration of presence through advanced broadcast services. Proceedings of the SPIE, Human Vision and Electronic Imaging, 39, pp.59-76.
  26. Fukuta, T. (1990), New electronic media and the human interface. Ergonomics, 33(3), pp.687-706. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139008927179
  27. Heeter, C. (1992), Being There Subjective Experience of Presence, Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, MIT press, fall.
  28. Hone, K.(2006), Empathic agents to re duce userfrustration: The effects of varying agent characteristics, Interacting with Computers, 18(2), pp.227-245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intcom.2005.05.003
  29. James J. La Follette(1993), Interactivity andmultimedia instruction: Crucial attributes for design and instruction, the Convention of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology Sponsored by the Research and Theory Division, 15th, New Orleans, Louisiana.
  30. Kantowitz, B. H., Roediger, III, H. L. & Elmes, D. G.(2001), Experimental psychology : Understanding psychological research(7th ed.), Belmont, CA: Wordsworth.
  31. Kim, T.(1996), The memory and persuasion effects of presence in television advertisement processing, Doctoral dissertation, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill.
  32. Kim, T. & Biocca, F. (1997), Telepresence va Television: Two dimensions of tele-presence may have different connections to memory and persuasion, Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 3(2).
  33. Lee, E. J.(2003), Effects of 'gender' of the computer on informational social influence : The moderating role of task type, International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 58(4), pp.347-362. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1071-5819(03)00009-0
  34. Lessiter, J., Freeman, J., Keogh, E., Davidoff, J.(2001), A cross-media presence questionnaire: The ITC-Sense of Presence Inventory, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments, 10(3), pp.282-298. https://doi.org/10.1162/105474601300343612
  35. Lombard, M., Reich, R. D., Grabe, M. E., Campanella, C. M. & Ditton, T. B.(1995), Bog TVs, little TVs: The role of screen size in viewer reponses to point-of-view movement, Paper presented to the Mass Communication division at the annual conference of the international communication association, Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA.
  36. Lombard, M., Reich, R. D., Grabe, M. E., Bracken, C. C. & Ditton, T. B.(2000), Presence and Television: The role of screen size, Human Communication Research, 26(1), pp.75-98.
  37. Lombard, M. & Ditton, T. B. (1997), At the heart of it all: The Concept of Presence, Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 3(2).
  38. Lombard, M. & Johns, M. T.(2004), Presence and sexuality, Presented at Presence, The Seventh International Workshop on Presence, Valencia, Spain.
  39. Lupker, S. J., Allen, N. J., & Hearty, P. J. (1988), The North American high definition television demonstrations to the public: The detailed survey results, Montreal, Canada: Committee for the North American High Definition Television Demonstrations to the Public.
  40. Nass, C. & Moon, Y.(2000), Machines and mindlessness: Social responses to computers, Journal of Social Issues, 56(1), pp.81-103. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00153
  41. Neuman, W. R. (1988), The mass audience looks at HDTV: An early experiment, Paper presented at the annual convention of the National Association of Broadcasters, Las Vegas.
  42. Neuman, W. R. (1990), Beyond HDTV: Explaining subjective responses to very high definition television, A research Report for GTE Labs and the TVOT consortium, Boston, Mass: MIT Media Laboratory.
  43. Picard, R. W.(1997), Affective Computing, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
  44. Poynton, C.(1996), A technical introduction to digital video, John wiley sons, Inc.
  45. Reeves, B.(1991), Being there: Television as symbolic versus natural experience, Unpublished manuscript, Stanford University, Institute for Communication Research, Stanford, CA.
  46. Reeves, B., Detenber, B. & Steuer, J.(1993), New television: The effects of big picture and big sound on viewer reponses to the screen, Paper presented to the information systems division of the international communication association, Washington, D. C.
  47. Reeves, B. & Nass, C.(1996), The media equation: How people treat computers, television, and new media like real people and places, Stanford, CA: CSU Publication.
  48. Reeves, B., Lang, A., Kim, E. Y., Tatar, D.(1999), The effects of screen size and message content on attention and arousal, Media Psychology, 1(1), pp.49-68. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532785xmep0101_4
  49. Salvatore L., Giovanni M., Salvatore S., Christina K., Carmelo A., Alba P., Daniele Di M. & Erinc M. (2008), Mobile Robotic Teleguide Based on Video Images Comparison Between Monoscopic and Stereoscopic Visualization, Robotics and Automation Magazine, 15(4), pp.58-67. https://doi.org/10.1109/MRA.2008.929927
  50. Schloerb, D. W.(1995), A quantitative measure of television, Presence, 4(1), pp.64-80. https://doi.org/10.1162/pres.1995.4.1.64
  51. Sheridan, T. B.(1992), Musings on telepresence and virtual presence, Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 1(1), pp.120-126. https://doi.org/10.1162/pres.1992.1.1.120
  52. Slater, M. & Usoh, M. (1993), Representations systems, perceptual position, and presence in immersive virtual environments, Presence, 2(3), pp.221-233. https://doi.org/10.1162/pres.1993.2.3.221
  53. Steuer, J. (1992), Defining virtual reality: dimensions determining telepresence, Journal of Communication, 42(4), pp.73-93. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1992.tb00812.x
  54. Steuer, J.(1995), Defining virtual reality: dimensions determining telepresence, in Frank Biocca & Mark R. Levy(eds.), Communication in the age of virtual reality, pp.33-56, Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  55. Tu, Chih-Hsiung(2001), How Chinese perceive social presence: An examination of interaction in an online learning environment, Educational Media International, 38(1), pp.45-60. https://doi.org/10.1080/09523980010021235
  56. Waterworth, E. L. & Waterworth J. A.(2000), Using a telescope in the cave: Presence and absence in educational VR. Presented at presence 2000, the 3rd international workshop on presence, Delft University of Technology, Delft, Netherlands.
  57. Westerink, J. H. D. H., & Roufs, J. A. J.(1989), Subjective image quality as a function of viewing distance, resolution and picture size. SMPTE Journal, 98, pp.113-119. https://doi.org/10.5594/J02825
  58. Witmer B. G. & Kline P. B. (1998), Judging Perceived and Traversed distance in virtual environments, presence, 7(2).
  59. Witmer. B. G. & Singer, M. J.(1998), Measuring presence in virtual environments: A presence questionnaire, Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 7(3), pp.225-240. https://doi.org/10.1162/105474698565686
  60. Witmer, B. G., Jerome, C. J. & Singer, M. J.(2005), The factor structure of the presence questionnaire, presence, 14(3).
  61. Witmer B. G., Sadowski W. J., Finkelstein, N. M.(2002), VE-Based Training strategies for acquiring survey knowledge, 11(1).
  62. Zahoric & Jenison(1998), Presence as Being-in-World, Presence: Teleoperators and virtual environments, 7(1), pp.78-89. https://doi.org/10.1162/105474698565541
  63. Zeltzer, D.(1992), Autonomy, interaction, and presence, Presence, 1(1), pp.127-132.
  64. http://www.voiceware.co.kr