악골내 거대 낭종 병소의 조대술 후 적출술의 시행 여부 및 적출 시기의 평가

EVALUATION ON THE DECISION AND TIMING OF CYST ENUCLEATION AFTER MARSUPIALIZATION OF LARGE SIZED CYSTIC LESION ON THE JAWS

  • 조지봉 (동아대학교 의과대학 구강악안면외과학교실) ;
  • 이광호 (부산대학교 치의학전문대학원 구강악안면외과학교실) ;
  • 이시현 (동아대학교 의과대학 구강악안면외과학교실) ;
  • 김복주 (동아대학교 의과대학 구강악안면외과학교실) ;
  • 김철훈 (동아대학교 의과대학 구강악안면외과학교실) ;
  • 황대석 (부산대학교 치의학전문대학원 구강악안면외과학교실) ;
  • 신상훈 (부산대학교 치의학전문대학원 구강악안면외과학교실) ;
  • 김욱규 (부산대학교 치의학전문대학원 구강악안면외과학교실)
  • Jo, Ji-Bong (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Collage of Medicine, Dong-A University) ;
  • Lee, Kwang-Ho (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Collage of Dentistry, Pusan National University) ;
  • Lee, Shi-Hyun (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Collage of Medicine, Dong-A University) ;
  • Kim, Bok-Ju (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Collage of Medicine, Dong-A University) ;
  • Kim, Chul-Hoon (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Collage of Medicine, Dong-A University) ;
  • Hwang, Dae-Suk (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Collage of Dentistry, Pusan National University) ;
  • Shin, Sang-Hun (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Collage of Dentistry, Pusan National University) ;
  • Kim, Uk-Kyu (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Collage of Dentistry, Pusan National University)
  • 발행 : 2009.12.31

초록

Objective: The purpose of this study was to determine whether cyst enucleation would be done after marsupialization of large cystic lesion on the jaws or not, and if so, when it should be done. Patients & Methods: 12 patients with cystic lesion treated by marsupialization only and 10 patients with cystic lesion treated by marsupialization followed by enucleation were examined in this study. Postoperative clinical and radiographic examinations were performed at 1, 4, 7, 10, 13, 16, 19 months on 22 patients. Bone regeneration and reduction rate of the residual cystic cavities and bone density were evaluated with a analysis of digital panoramic radiographs. Also histological evaluation of the healing process was performed on 1 patient. Results: Uneventful healing and spontaneous bony filling of the residual cavities were observed in all cases. Postoperative radiographs showed that the size of the lesions was reduced for a few months, but the reduction rate of the residual cavity was minimized for 13~16 months after marsupialization. The bone density was increased 22.5 % after 19 months. Conclusion: This results suggest that the appropriate timing to perform enucleation would be 13~16 months after marsupialization. The state of healing process could be confirmed by histological examination and radiographic evaluation of bone density. Enucleation after marsupialization could be applied appropriately to reduce the periods of bone healing in large cystic lesion on the jaws.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Tucker WM, Pleasants JE, MacComb WS. Decompression and secondary enucleation of a mandibular cyst: report of case. J Oral Surg 1972;30:669-73
  2. Marker P, Brondum N, Clausen PP, Bastian HL. Treatment of large odontogenic keratocysts by decompression and later cystectomy: A long-term follow-up and a histologic study of 23 cases. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1996;82:122-31 https://doi.org/10.1016/S1079-2104(96)80214-9
  3. Nakamura N, Mitsuyasu T, Mitsuyasu Y, Taketomi T, Higuchi Y, Ohishi M. Marsupialization for odontogenic keratocysts: Longterm follow-up analysis of the effects and changes in growth characteristics. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2002;94:543-53 https://doi.org/10.1067/moe.2002.128022
  4. Partsch C. Uber kiefercysten. Deutsche Monatsschrift Fur Zahnheilkunde 1892;10:271
  5. Partsch C. Zur behandlung der kieferzysten. Deutsche Monatsschrift Fur Zahnheilkunde 1910;28:252
  6. Pogrel MA, Jordan RCK. Marsupialization as a definitive treatment for the odontogenic keratocyst. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2004;62:651-5 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2003.08.029
  7. Pogrel MA. Treatment of Keratocysts: The Case for decompression and marsupialization. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2005;63:1667-73 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2005.08.008
  8. Tolstunov L, Treasure T. Surgical Treatment algorithm for odontogenic keratocyst: Combined treatment of odontogenic keratocyst and mandibular defect with marsupialization, enucleation, iliac crest bone graft, and dental implants. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2008;66:1025-36 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2007.08.014
  9. Maurette PE, Jorge J, Moraes M. Conservative treatment protocol of odontogenic keratocyst: A preliminary study. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2006;64:379-83 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2005.11.007
  10. Gardner DG, Corio RL. Plexiform unicystic ameloblastoma. A variant of ameloblastoma with a low-recurrence rate after enucleation. Cancer 1984;53:1730-5 https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0142(19840415)53:8<1730::AID-CNCR2820530819>3.0.CO;2-U
  11. Nakamura N, Higuchi Y, Tashiro H, Ohishi M. Marsupialization of cystic ameloblastoma : A clinical and histopathologic study of the growth characteristics before and after marsupialization. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1995;53:748-54 https://doi.org/10.1016/0278-2391(95)90323-2
  12. Matsumura S, Murakami S, Kakimoto N, Furukawa S, Kishino M, Ishida T, et al. Histopathologic and radiographic findings of the simple bone cyst. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1998;85:619-25 https://doi.org/10.1016/S1079-2104(98)90301-8
  13. Fujii R, Kawakami M, Hyomoto M, Ishida J, Kirita T. Panoramic findings for predicting eruption of mandibular premolars associated with dentigerous cyst after marsupialization. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2008;66:272-6 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2007.06.652
  14. Sakkas N, Schoen R, Schulze D, Otten J, Schmelzeisen R. Obturator after marsupialization of a recurrence of a radicular cyst of the mandible. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2007;103:e16-8 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2006.06.063
  15. Chiapasco M, Rossi A, Motta JJ, Crescentini M. Spontaneous bone regeneration after enucleation of large mandibular cysts: A radiographic computed analysis of 27 consecutive cases. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2000;58:942-8 https://doi.org/10.1053/joms.2000.8732
  16. Eyre J, Zakrzewska JM. The conservative management of large odontogenic keratocysts. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1985;23:195-203 https://doi.org/10.1016/0266-4356(85)90090-7
  17. Nakamura N, Higuchi Y, Mitsuyasu T, Sandra F, Ohishi M. Comparison of long-term results between different approaches to ameloblastoma. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2002;93:13-20 https://doi.org/10.1067/moe.2002.119517
  18. Fickling BW. Cysts of the jaw: a long-term survey of types and treatment. Proc R Soc Med 1965;58:847-54
  19. Jensen J, Sindet-Pedersen S, Simonsen EK. A comparative study of treatment of keratocysts by enucleation or enucleation combined with cryotherapy: A preliminary report. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 1988;16:362-5 https://doi.org/10.1016/S1010-5182(88)80080-5
  20. Irvine GH, Bowerman JE. Mandibular keratocysts: surgical management. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1985;23:204-9 https://doi.org/10.1016/0266-4356(85)90091-9
  21. Brondum N, Jensen VJ. Recurrence of keratocysts and decompression treatment: A long-term follow-up of forty-four cases. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1991;72:265-9 https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-4220(91)90211-T