DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Enhancing Box Sign : Enhancement Pattern of Acute Osteoprotic Compression Fracture

  • Kim, Choong-Hyo (Department of Neurosurgery, Kangwon National University College of Medicine) ;
  • Park, Jae-Hyo (Department of Neurosurgery, Kangwon National University College of Medicine) ;
  • Chung, Sang-Ki (Department of Neurosurgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine) ;
  • Kim, Ki-Jeong (Department of Neurosurgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine) ;
  • Bang, Jae-Seung (Department of Neurosurgery, East-West Neo Medical Center, Kyung Hee University School of Medicine) ;
  • Kim, Hyun-Jib (Department of Neurosurgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine)
  • Published : 2009.12.28

Abstract

Objective : Although gadolinium enhancement of compression fractures is well known, the enhancement pattern of the acute stage of a fracture is not completely understood. Here, we investigated the enhancement pattern of acute vertebral compression fractures (VCFs). Methods : We conducted a retrospective study of patients with acute osteoporotic VCFs admitted to hospital between January 2004 and December 2005. The demographic details, stage of the fracture, management data, and results were analyzed. There were nine men and 22 women, and the mean age was 71 years (range, 53-92 years). According to the onset of pain, patients were divided into the following four groups : Group I (less than 3 days), Group II (4-7 days), Group III (8-14 days), and Group IV (14-30 days). Results : All patients had central low-signal intensity of the nonenhancing part of vertebral bodies on T1 images. Enhancing box sign (EBS) was seen 7 days of VCF development. After 7 days of onset (Groups III and IV), patch or Kummell's enhancements occurred. EBS has been statistically correlated with stage of compression fracture (Pearson's correlation = -0.774). However, EBS had no statistically significant correlation with prognosis in our study (Pearson's correlation = 0.059). Conclusion : EBS represents a characteristic sign 7 days of VCF development.

Keywords

References

  1. Baur A, Stabler A, Arbogast S, Duerr HR, Bartl R, Reiser M : Acute osteoporotic and neoplastic vertebral compression fractures : fluid sign at MR imaging. Radiology 225 : 730-735, 2002 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2253011413
  2. Baur A, Stabler A, Bruning R, Bartl R, Krodel A, Reiser M, et al. : Diffusion-weighted MR imaging of bone marrow : differentiation of benign versus pathologic compression fractures. Radiology 207 : 349-356, 1998 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.207.2.9577479
  3. Brown DB, Glaiberman CB, Gilula LA, Shimony JS : Correlation between preprocedural MRI findings and clinical outcomes in the treatment of chronic symptomatic vertebral compression fractures with percutaneous vertebroplasty. AJR Am J Roentgenol 184 : 1951-1955, 2005 https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.184.6.01841951
  4. Chen WT, Shih TT, Chen RC, Lo HY, Chou CT, Lee JM, et al. : Blood perfusion of vertebral lesions evaluated with gadoliniumenhanced dynamic MRI : in comparison with compression fracture and metastasis. J Magn Reson Imaging 15 : 308-314, 2002 https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.10063
  5. Chen WT, Shih TT, Chen RC, Lo SY, Chou CT, Lee JM, et al. : Vertebral bone marrow perfusion evaluated with dynamic contrastenhanced MR imaging : significance of aging and sex. Radiology 220 : 213-218, 2001 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.220.1.r01jl32213
  6. Cuenod CA, Laredo JD, Chevret S, Hamze B, Naouri JF, Chapaux X, et al. : Acute vertebral collapse due to osteoporosis or malignancy : appearance on unenhanced and gadolinium-enhanced MR images. Radiology 199 : 541-549, 1996 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.199.2.8668809
  7. Do HM : Magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of patients for percutaneous vertebroplasty. Top Magn Reson Imaging 11 : 235-244, 2000 https://doi.org/10.1097/00002142-200008000-00004
  8. Dupuy DE, Palmer WE, Rosenthal DI : Vertebral fluid collection associated with vertebral collapse. AJR Am J Roentgenol 167 : 1535-1538, 1996 https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.167.6.8956592
  9. Frager D, Elkin C, Swerdlow M, Bloch S : Subacute osteoporotic compression fracture : misleading magnetic resonance appearance. Skeletal Radiol 17 : 123-126, 1988 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00365140
  10. Jung HS, Jee WH, McCauley TR, Ha KY, Choi KH : Discrimination of metastatic from acute osteoporotic compression spinal fractures with MR imaging. Radiographics 23 : 179-187, 2003 https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.231025043
  11. Mathis JM, Barr JD, Belkoff SM, Barr MS, Jensen ME, Deramond H : Percutaneous vertebroplasty : a developing standard of care for vertebral compression fractures. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 22 : 373-381, 2001
  12. McArdle CB, Crofford MJ, Mirfakhraee M, Amparo EG, Calhoun JS : Surface coil MR of spinal trauma : preliminary experience. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 7 : 885-893, 1986
  13. Melton LJ 3rd, Kan SH, Frye MA, Wahner HW, O'Fallon WM, Riggs BL : Epidemiology of vertebral compression fracture. Am J Epidemiol 129 : 1000-1011, 1989 https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a115204
  14. Modic MT, Masaryk TJ, Weinstein MA : Magnetic resonance imaging of the spine. Magn Reson Annu : 37-54, 1986
  15. Moore RJ, Osti OL, Vernon-Roberts B, Fraser RD : Changes in endplate vascularity after an outer anulus tear in the sheep. Spine 17 : 874-878, 1992 https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199208000-00003
  16. Oka M, Matsusako M, Kobayashi N, Uemura A, Numaguchi Y : Intravertebral cleft sign on fat-suppressed contrast-enhanced MR : correlation with cement distribution pattern on percutaneous vertebroplasty. Acad Radiol 12 : 992-999, 2005 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2005.05.003
  17. Osborn AG : Diagnostic neuroradiology. St. Louis : Mosby, 1994
  18. Silverman SL : The clinical consequences of vertebral compression fracture. Bone 13 Suppl 2 : S27- S31, 1992 https://doi.org/10.1016/8756-3282(92)90193-Z
  19. Singh A, Wetherington CA, Gilula LA : Percutaneous vertebroplasty in osteoporotic compression fracture with epidural hematoma. AJR Am J Roentgenol 186 : 909-910, 2006 https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.04.0675
  20. Stallmeyer MJ, Zoarski GH, Obuchowski AM : Optimizing patient selection in percutaneous vertebroplasty. J Vasc Interv Radiol 14 : 683-696, 2003 https://doi.org/10.1097/01.RVI.0000064859.87207.FA
  21. Tanigawa N, Komemushi A, Kariya S, Kojima H, Shomura Y, Ikeda K, et al. : Percutaneous vertebroplasty : relationship between vertebral body bone marrow edema pattern on MR images and initial clinical response. Radiology 239 : 195-200, 2006 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2391050073
  22. Uemura A, Kobayashi N, Numaguchi Y, Fuwa S, Saida Y : Preprocedural MR imaging for percutaneous vertebroplasty : special interest in contrast enhancement. Radiat Med 25 : 325-328, 2007 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11604-007-0143-5