DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Behavior of Reinforced Earth Retaining Wall for Permitting Reinforcement to Subside with Monitoring

현장계측을 통한 보강재 침하형 보강토 옹벽의 거동특성

  • 정진혁 (서울시립대학교 토목공학과) ;
  • 오종근 (충북대학교 토목공학과) ;
  • 이송 (서울시립대학교 토목공학과)
  • Published : 2009.02.28

Abstract

The conventional reinforced earth retaining wall has the connector system to fix the reinforcement and block. However, this system defect may cause the crack of block and the rupture of reinforcement due to the stress concentration near the face of reinforced earth retaining wall. Hence, the new connector system which was able to allow the settlement of reinforcement was developed in this study and a test was carried out in the study area which is divided into the conventional reinforced earth retaining wall and reinforced Earth Retaining Wall driving the settlement. As the results of field monitoring in situ, the ratio of tensile force calculated at maximum value on contiguous portion of front block showed that the settlement type decreased the stress concentration near the face of front block greater than the conventional type.

기존의 블록식 보강토옹벽의 경우 블록과 보강재 연결을 핀, 커텍터 등으로 연결하므로 전면부에 응력집중이 발생하여 블록의 균열이나 보강재 파단파괴가 발생할 수 있는 단점이 있다. 이에 본 연구는 보강재의 침하를 허용하는 새로운 연결시스템을 개발하여 연구대상지역에 일반형 블록식 보강토옹벽 구간과 보강재 침하형 보강토옹벽 구간으로 나누어 시험시공을 실시하였다. 시공과정 및 이후의 현장계측결과 전면블록에 인접한 부분에서 최대인장력으로부터 구한 인장력비가 일반형 보다 침하형이 전면블록 전면부의 음력집중이 크게 감소하는 것으로 나타났다.

Keywords

References

  1. 김진만, 조삼덕, 오세용, 이대영, 백영식 (2005), "보강토 옹벽 전면블록의 마찰특성 평가" 한국지반공학회논문집, 제21권, 제1호, pp.51-58
  2. 신은철, 최찬용 (1998), "보강재 연결 유.무에 따른 보강토옹벽의 보강효과:, 한국지반공학회논문집, 제14권, 제5호, pp.67-76
  3. 이창섭(2004), 블럭식 보강토옹벽의 거동분석, 인천대학교 대학원 박사학위논문
  4. Bacot, J., Iltis, M., Lareal, P., Paumier, T., and Sanglerat, G. (1978), "Study of the Soil Reinforcement Friction Coefficient", Proceedings of the Symposium on Earth Reinforcement, ASCE, Pittsburgh, PA, USA, pp.157-185
  5. Costalonga, M. A. R. (1988), "Geogrid Pull-out Tests in Clay", Master of Science. sc. Thesis, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, p.211
  6. Fannin, R. J., and Raju, D. M. (1991), "Pull-out Resistance of Geosynthetics", 44th Canadian Geotechnical Conference, Calgary, Alberta, pp.81/1-8
  7. Giroud, J. P., Darrasse, J., and Bachus, R. C. (1993), "Hyperbolic Expression for Soil-geosynthetic or Geosynthetic Interface Shear Strength", Geotextiles and Geomembranes, Vol.12, pp.275-286 https://doi.org/10.1016/0266-1144(93)90030-R
  8. Ingold, T. S. (1984), "A Laboratory Investigation of Soil-geotextile Friction", Ground Engineering, Vol.17, pp.21-28
  9. Jewell, R. A. (1980), "Some effects of Reinforcement on the Mechanical Behaviour of Soil", Ph.D. Thesis, Cambridge University
  10. Juran, I., Knochenmus, G., Acar, Y. B., and Arman, A. (1988), "Pull-out Response of Geotextiles and Geogrids", Proc. of Symp. on Geotextile for Soil Improvement, ASCE, Geotechnical Special Publication 18, pp.92-111
  11. Kate, J. M., Rao, G. V., and Tyagi, S. K. (1988), "Evaluation of Soil-reinforcement Friction", Ind. Geotech. J., Vol.18, pp.153-160
  12. Palmeria, E. M. (1988), "Discussion on Direct Shear Tests on Reinforced Soil by Jewell & Wroth (1987)", Geotechnique, Vol. 38, pp.146-148
  13. Rao, G. V., and Pandey, S. K. (1988), "Evaluation of Geotextilesoil Friction", Ind. Geotech. J., Vol.18, pp.77-105
  14. Schlosser, F., and Elias, E. (1978), 'Friction in Reinforced Earth', Proceedings of the Symposium on Earth Reinforcement, ASCE, Pittsburgh, PA, USA, pp.735-763
  15. Srinivasa Murthy, B. R., Sridharan, A., and Bindumadhava (1993), "Evaluation of Interfacial Frictional Resistance", Geotextiles and Geomembranes, Vol.12, pp.235-253 https://doi.org/10.1016/0266-1144(93)90028-M