The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics

The Korean Academy of Prosthodonitics (대한치과보철학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Evaluation of proximal contact strength by postural changes

  • Kim, Hee-Sun (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Chosun University) ;
  • Na, Hyun-Joon (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Chosun University) ;
  • Kim, Hee-Jung (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Chosun University) ;
  • Kang, Dong-Wan (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Chosun University) ;
  • Oh, Sang-Ho (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Chosun University)
  • Published : 2009.11.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM. Proper proximal contact is important for maintaining and stabilizing the dental arch. However, the proximal contact strength (PCS) is not a constant value and can be affected by a variety of factors. PURPOSE. This study examined the influences of postural changes on the posterior PCS. MATERIAL AND METHODS. Twelve adults with a normal occlusion and had not undergone prosthetic treatment or proximal restoration were participated in this study. A metal strip was inserted into the proximal surface and removed at a constant velocity. The contact strength was measured in every contact point between canine to second molar in both arches. The PCSs were obtained initially in the upright position, secondly in the supine position and finally in the upright position again. All measurements were repeated after a 2 hour period. Statistical analysis was carried out using the Friedman test (P < .05). RESULTS. Generally, a decrease in PCS occurred when the posture was changed from the initial upright to supine position, while it increased when the posture was changed from the supine to upright position. A significant change was observed in all areas except for between the canine-first premolar in the maxilla and between the first molar-second molar in the mandible areas. CONCLUSION. The posterior PCS, which dentists generally believe to be a static feature of occlusion, is affected significantly by posture.

Keywords

References

  1. The academy of prosthodontics. The glossary of prosthodontic terms. 8th ed. J Prosthet Dent 2005;94:37,57.
  2. Andrews LF. The six keys to normal occlusion. Am J Orthod 1972;62:296-309. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9416(72)90268-0
  3. Wheeler RC. An atlas of tooth form. 4th ed. Philadelphia, W.B. Saunders Co; 1969:12.
  4. Sluder TB. Clinical dental anatomy, histology, physiology and occlusion. In: Studevant CM, ed. The art and science of operative dentistry. 2nd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1985:21.
  5. Hirschfeld I. Food impaction. J Am Dent Assoc 1930;17:1504-28.
  6. Hancock EB, Mayo CV, Schwab RR, Wirthlin MR. Influence of interdental contacts on periodontal status. J Periodontol 1980;51:445-9. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1980.51.8.445
  7. Nielsen IM, Glavind L, Karring T. Interproximal periodontal intrabony defects. Prevalence, localization and etiological factors. J Clin Periodontol 1980;7:187-98. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.1980.tb01962.x
  8. Jernberg GR, Bakdash MB, Keenan KM. Relationship between proximal tooth open contacts and periodontal disease. J Periodontol 1983;54:529-33. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1983.54.9.529
  9. Vardimon AD, Matsaev E, Lieberman M, Brosh T. Tightness of dental contact points in spaced and non-spaced permanent dentitions. Eur J Orthod 2001;23:305-14. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/23.3.305
  10. Prakki A, Cilli R, Saad JO, Rodrigues JR. Clinical evaluation of proximal contacts of Class II esthetic direct restorations. Quintessence Int 2004;35:785-9.
  11. Kasahara K, Miura H, Kuriyama M, Kato H, Hasegawa S. Observations of interproximal contact relations during clenching. Int J Prosthodont 2000;13:289-94.
  12. Campagni WV. The final touch in the delivery of a fixed prosthesis. CDA J 1984;12:21-9.
  13. Sturdevant JR, Sturdevant CM. Gold inlay and gold onlay restoration for Class II cavity preparations. In: Sturdevant C, Barton R, Sockwell C, Strickland W, eds. The Art and Science of Operative Dentistry. St. Louis, MO, USA: C.V. Mosby Co.1985:490.
  14. Osborn JW. An investigation into the interdental forces occurring between the teeth of the same arch during clenching the jaws. Arch Oral Biol 1961;5:202-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-9969(61)90058-9
  15. Dorfer CE, von Bethlenfalvy ER, Staehle HJ, Pioch T. Factors influencing proximal dental contact strengths. Eur J Oral Sci 2000;108:368-77. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0722.2000.108005368.x
  16. Oh SH, Nakano M, Bando E, Keisuke N, Shigemoto S, Jeong JH, Kang DW. Relationship between occlusal tooth contact patterns and tightness of proximal tooth contact. J Oral Rehabil 2006;33:749-53. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.2006.01635.x
  17. Southard TE, Behrents RG, Tolley EA. The anterior component of occlusal force. Part 1. Measurement and distribution. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1989;96:493-500. https://doi.org/10.1016/0889-5406(89)90116-9
  18. Choi WJ, Kim KH, Kim JA, Kang DW, Oh SH. Evaluation and development of digital device for measuring proximal tooth contact tightness. J Korean Acad Prosthodont 2007;45:687-95.
  19. Southard TE, Southard KA, Tolley EA. Variation of approximal tooth contact tightness with postural change. J Dent Res 1990;69:1776-9. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345900690111301
  20. Shames IH. Engineering Mechanics, Vol. 1, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1966;170-4.
  21. Fuhrmann R, Grave C, Diedrich P. In vitro evaluation of a measurement method to analyze the interdental, mesially directed force. J Orofac Orthop 1998;59:362-70. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01299772
  22. Kim KH. Evaluation of proximal tooth contact tightness in permanent dentitions. M.S. Thesis. In: Korea, Chosun University School of Dentistry. 2007.
  23. Southard TE, Southard KA, Tolley EA. Periodontal force: a potential cause of relapse. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1992;101:221-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/0889-5406(92)70090-W
  24. Miyamoto K, Yamada K, Ishizuka Y, Morimoto N, Tanne K. Masseter muscle activity during the whole day in young adults. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1996;110:394-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-5406(96)70041-0
  25. Smith JJ, Kampine JP. Circulatory physiology- the essential. Baltimore, MD: Waverly Press, Inc., 1984:235-7.
  26. Rowell LB, Blackmon JR. Reflex and local control of the splanchnic circulation in humans. In: Hunyor S, Ludbrook J, Shaw J, McGrath M, eds. The peripheral circulation. New York: Excerpta Medica, 1984:114.
  27. Moxham BJ. The role of the periodontal vasculature in tooth eruption. In: Davidovitch Z, ed. The biological mechanisms of tooth eruption and root resorption. Birmingham: EBSCO Media, 1988:208.
  28. Korber KH. Periodontal pulsation. J Periodontol 1970;41:382-90. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1970.41.7.382
  29. Ng GC, Walker TW, Zingg W, Burke PS. Effects of tooth loading on the periodontal vasculature of the mandibular fourth premolar in dogs. Arch Oral Biol 1981;26:189-95. https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-9969(81)90129-1
  30. Boice PA, Niles SM, Dubois LM. Evaluation of proximal contacts with shim stock. J Oral Rehabil 1987;14:91-4. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.1987.tb00697.x

Cited by

  1. The anterior component of occlusal force revisited: direct measurement and theoretical considerations vol.38, pp.2, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjv028
  2. The influence of the stomatognathic system on explosive strength: a pilot study vol.28, pp.1, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1589/jpts.28.72
  3. Proximal Prematurities in Prosthodontics vol.5, pp.2, 2015, https://doi.org/10.5005/ijoprd-5-2-iv
  4. Clinical evaluation of differences in proximal contact strength of various fixed dental prosthesis materials vol.29, pp.6, 2009, https://doi.org/10.4103/ijdr.ijdr_21_18
  5. Occlusal sequalae of the loss of first permanent molars among children and adolescents. vol.3, pp.2, 2009, https://doi.org/10.2478/asmj-2020-0012