대한간호학회지 (Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing)

한국간호과학회 (Korean Society of Nursing Science)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

터치스크린 컴퓨터를 이용한 천식 특이형 삶의 질 측정

Computerized Measurement for Asthma-Specific Quality of Life: Comparison with a Conventional Paper-and-Pencil Questionnaire

  • 이은현 (아주대학교 보건대학원)
  • Lee, Eun-Hyun (Graduate School of Public Health, Ajou University)
  • 발행 : 2009.12.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate a computerized touch-screen version of the asthma-specific quality-of-life (cA-QOL) questionnaire against the conventional paper-and-pencil version (pA-QOL) for equivalence, time for completion, user preference, and ease of use. Methods: A total of 261 patients were recruited. A randomized cross-over design was used. Patients in group A completed the cA-QOL first while waiting to see a physician, and completed the pAQOL version after seeing the physician. Patients allocated in group B completed these questionnaires in the reverse order. The patients were asked questions about user preference and ease of use of the cA-QOL. The time taken to complete both versions of the questionnaire was measured. Results: Weighted kappa coefficients of all items showed almost perfect agreement. The time required to complete the pA-QOL is faster than the time for cA-QOL. The patients who preferred the cA-QOL were 37.5%, while those who preferred the pA-QOL were 29.9%. Most patients reported that the cA-QOL was "easy" or "very easy" to complete. Conclusion: The cA-QOL is the computerized equivalent of the pA-QOL. The findings herein demonstrate that the cA-QOL can be helpful to nurses in busy practices for assessing, collecting, and evaluating their patients' health related quality of life.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Allenby, A., Matthews, J., Beresford, J., & McLachlan, S. A. (2002). The application of computer touch-screen technology in screening for psychosocial distress in an ambulatory oncology setting. European Journal of Cancer Care, 11, 245-253 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2354.2002.00310.x
  2. American Psychology Association. (1986). Guidelines for computer based tests and interpretation. Washington DC: Author
  3. Armitage, P., & Berry, G. (1995). Further analysis of categorical data:Kappa measure of agreement. In P. Armitage & G. Berry (Eds.), Statistical Methods in Medical Research (3rd ed.) (pp. 443-447). Malden, MA: Blackwell Science
  4. Bliven, B. D., Kaufman, S. E., & Spertus, J. A. (2001). Electronic collection of health-related quality of life data: Validity, time benefit, and patient preference. Quality of Life Research, 10, 15-22 https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016740312904
  5. Cohen, J. (1987). Statistical Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (Rev. ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Association
  6. Juniper, E. F., Guyatt, G. H., Epstein, R. S., Ferrie, P. J., Jaeschke, R., & Hiller, T. K. (1992). Evaluation of impairment of health related quality of life in asthma: Development of a questionnaire for use in clinical trials. Thorax, 47, 76-83 https://doi.org/10.1136/thx.47.2.76
  7. Kim, C. W., Chung, H. W., Shin, J. I., Bae S. W., Park, J. W., Cho, S. Y., et al. (2002). Generic health-related quality of life in patients with bronchial asthma. Korean Journal of Asthma, Allergy and Clinical Immunology, 22, 558-566
  8. Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33, 159-174 https://doi.org/10.2307/2529310
  9. Lee, E. H. (2009). Touch-screen computerized quality-of-life assessment for patients with cancer. Asian Nursing Research, 3, 41-48 https://doi.org/10.1016/S1976-1317(09)60015-3
  10. Lee, E. H., Kim, S. H., Choi, J. H., Jee, Y. G., Nahm, D. H., & Park, H. S. (2009). Development and evaluation of an asthma-specific quality of life (A-QOL) questionnaire. Journal of Asthma, 46, 716-721 https://doi.org/10.1080/02770900903067887
  11. Marks, G. B., Dunn, S. M., & Woolcock, A. J. (1992). A scale for the measurement of quality of life in adults with asthma. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 45, 461-472 https://doi.org/10.1016/0895-4356(92)90095-5
  12. Pocock, S. J. (1983). Clinical Trials. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons
  13. Pouwer, F., Snoek, F. J., van der Ploeg, H. M., Heine, R. J., & Brand, A. N. (1998). A comparison of the standard and the computerized versions of the Well-Being Questionnaire (WBQ) and the Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (DTSQ). Quality of Life Research, 7, 33-38 https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008832821181
  14. Ryan, J. M., Corry, J. R., Attewell, R., & Smithson, M. J. (2002). A comparison of an electronic version of the SF-36 general health questionnaire to standard paper version. Quality of Life Research, 11, 19-26 https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014415709997
  15. Schmier, J. K., Chan, K. S., & Leidy, N. K. (1998). The impact of asthma on health-related quality of life. Journal of Asthma, 35, 585-597 https://doi.org/10.3109/02770909809048961
  16. Tooth, L. R., & Ottenbacher, K, J. (2004). The k statistics in rehabilitation research: An examination. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 85, 1371-1376 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2003.12.002
  17. Velikova, G., Wright, E. P., Smith, A. B., Cull, A., Gould, A., Forman, D., et al. (1999). Automated collection of quality of life data: A comparison of paper and computer touch-screen questionnaire. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 17, 998-1007
  18. Weinberger, M., Oddone, E. Z., Samsa, G. P., & Pamela, B. L. (1996). Are health-related quality of life measures affected by the mode of administration? Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 49, 135-140 https://doi.org/10.1016/0895-4356(95)00556-0
  19. Wilson, A. S., Kitas, G. D., Karruthers, D. M., Reay, C., Skan, J., Harris, S., et al. (2002). Computerized information-gathering in specialist rheumatology clinics: An initial evaluation of an electronic version of the Short Form 36. Rheumatology, 41, 268-273 https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/41.3.268

피인용 문헌

  1. 해외 이민 한국인의 정신건강관리를 위한 웹기반 지능형 전문가시스템 개발 및 적용 vol.43, pp.2, 2013, https://doi.org/10.4040/jkan.2013.43.2.203
  2. A Computerized Asthma-Specific Quality of Life: A Novel Tool for Reflecting Asthma Control and Predicting Exacerbation vol.163, pp.1, 2009, https://doi.org/10.1159/000356336
  3. Equivalence of electronic and paper-based patient-reported outcome measures vol.24, pp.8, 2009, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-015-0937-3
  4. Equivalence of electronic and paper administration of patient-reported outcome measures: a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies conducted between 2007 and 2013 vol.13, pp.None, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-015-0362-x
  5. Tablets instead of paper-based tests for young children? Comparability between paper and tablet versions of the mathematical Heidelberger Rechen Test 1-4 vol.23, pp.3, 2009, https://doi.org/10.1080/10627197.2018.1488587