Capsular Flaps for Correcting Implant Palpability in Secondary Augmentation Mammoplasty

유방성형술의 재수술에서의 보형물 만져짐 교정을 위한 피막 피판

  • Yoo, Gyeol (Department of Plastic Surgery, College of medicine, The Catholic University of Korea) ;
  • Lee, Paik-Kwon (Apgugeong Avenue Plastic Surgery Clinic)
  • 유결 (가톨릭대학교 의과대학 성형외과학 교실) ;
  • 이백권 (압구정 에비뉴 성형외과)
  • Published : 2009.11.15

Abstract

Purpose: Among reasons for reoperations in augmentation mammoplasty, palpable implant, due to thin skin is relatively common, but not easy to correct, especially if thin skin area is wide. The capsule around the implant is a physiologic response to foreign body, naturally formed, and suitable for use as a flap because of its high vascularity. Authors report that capsular flap is very effective and successful method for correction of implant palpability in secondary breast augmentation. Methods: From September 2007 to September 2008, the capular flaps were performed on 5 patients having palpable and wrinkling breast implants due to very thin skin among the cases on whom secondary augmentation mammaplasty had been performed. After the capsular flap was elevated according to thin skin area, the capsular flap was turned down or over to cover the thin skin area and made the thin skin area thick. Results: Post - implant palpable breast wrinkling had been successfully corrected by capsular flaps and breast implants were not palpable any more during the follow - up period(average 9.2 months). All patients who suffered from deformed breast were satisfied. Conclusion: Authors suggest that the capsular flap is a ideal, effective and useful method in management of implant palpability.

Keywords

References

  1. Bengtson BP, Van Natta BW, Murphy DK, Slicton A, Maxwell GP; Style 410 U.S. Core Clinical Study Group: Style 410 highly cohesive silicone breast implant core study results at 3 years. Plast Reconst Surg 120: 40S, 2007 https://doi.org/10.1097/01.prs.0000286666.29101.11
  2. Araco A, Gravante G, Araco F, Delogu D, Cervelli V, Walgenbach K: A retrospective analysis of 3,000 primary aesthetic breast augmentations: Postoperative complications and associated factors. Aesthetic Plast Surg 31: 532, 2007 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-007-0162-8
  3. unningham B: The mentor core study on silicone memorygel breast implants. Plast Reconstr Surg 120: 19S, 2007 https://doi.org/10.1097/01.prs.0000286574.88752.04
  4. Coleman SR, Saboeiro AP: Fat grafting to the breast revisited: Safety and efficacy. Plast Reconstr Surg 119: 775, 2007 https://doi.org/10.1097/01.prs.0000252001.59162.c9
  5. Baxter RA: Intracapsular allogenic dermal grafts for breast implant-related problems. Plast Reconstr Surg 112: 1692, 2003 https://doi.org/10.1097/01.PRS.0000086365.25453.C3
  6. Massiha H: Scar tissue flaps for the correction of postimplant breast rippling. Ann Plast Surg 48: 505, 2002 https://doi.org/10.1097/00000637-200205000-00009
  7. Gargano F, Moloney DM, Arnstein PM: Use of a capsular flap to prevent palpable wrinkling of implants. Br J Plast Surg 55: 269, 2002
  8. Imran D, Javaid M, Lewis D, Attar KH: Capsular flap for correction of contour deformities of the breast. Ann plast surg 54: 662, 2005 https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sap.0000158070.69924.34
  9. Rubino C, Mazzarello V, Farace F, D'Andrea F, Montella A, Fenu G, Campus GV: Ultrastructural anatomy of contracted capsules around textured implants in augmented breasts. Ann plast surg 46: 95, 2001 https://doi.org/10.1097/00000637-200102000-00001
  10. Bengtson BP: Complications, reoperations, and revisions in breast augmentation. Clin plast surg 36: 139, 2009 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cps.2008.08.002
  11. Friedman HI, Friedman AC, Carson K: The fate of the fibrous capsule after saline implant removal. Ann plast surg 46: 215, 2001 https://doi.org/10.1097/00000637-200103000-00002
  12. Rockwell WB, Casey HD, Cheng CA: Breast capsule persistence after breast implant removal. Plast reconstr surg 101: 1085, 1998 https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-199804040-00031