Stabilization Methods to Separate and Analyze Materials in Seawaters using Fl-FFF

해수중의 물질 분리 및 분석을 위한 Fl-FFF의 안정화 기법

  • Choi, Soohoon (Water Environmental Plant Engineering Lab., School of Civil, Environment & Architectural Engineering, Korea University) ;
  • Lee, Sangyoup (Water Environmental Plant Engineering Lab., School of Civil, Environment & Architectural Engineering, Korea University) ;
  • Hong, Seungkwan (Water Environmental Plant Engineering Lab., School of Civil, Environment & Architectural Engineering, Korea University) ;
  • Moon, Jihee (Environmental Research Team, R&D Institute, Kolon E&C)
  • 최수훈 (고려대학교 건축.사회환경공학부 물환경 플랜트공학 연구실) ;
  • 이상엽 (고려대학교 건축.사회환경공학부 물환경 플랜트공학 연구실) ;
  • 홍승관 (고려대학교 건축.사회환경공학부 물환경 플랜트공학 연구실) ;
  • 문지희 (코오롱건설(주) 기술연구소 환경연구팀)
  • Received : 2008.12.22
  • Accepted : 2009.02.11
  • Published : 2009.03.30

Abstract

Flow field-flow fractionation (Fl-FFF) device has been widely used to verify the size and molecular weight of various colloids and organics. The Fl-FFF, however, generally uses carrier solutions with only low to moderate ionic strengths to exclude the high affinity of materials to the membrane under high ionic strength conditions. Thus, materials existing in seawaters have not been accurately analysed based on the hydrodynamic size and molecular weight using current Fl-FFF techniques. The highest ionic strength tested was up to 0.1 M, while seawater ionic strength is about 0.6 M. The aim of this study is to accurately measure the hydrodynamic size of particles under carrier solutions close to seawater conditions with the Fl-FFF. By employing various operating conditions during the Fl-FFF analyses, it was demonstrated that the flow conditions, the concentration of surfactants, and stabilization times were key factors in acquiring compatible data. Results have shown that the cross flow was more influential factor than the channel flow. The concentration of the surfactant was to be at least 0.05% and the minimum 15 hr of stabilization was needed for accurate and reproducible data acquisition under seawater condition.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

Supported by : 국토해양부

References

  1. Beckett, R., Zang, J., and Giddings, J. C. (1987). Determination of Molecular weight Distributions of Fulvic and Humic Acids Using Flow-Field Flow Fractionation. Environ. Sci. Technol., 21, pp. 289-295 https://doi.org/10.1021/es00157a010
  2. Cho, J., Kim, I. S., Moon, J., and Kwon, B. (2005). Determining Brownian and shear-induced diffusivity of nanoand micro-particles for sustainable membrane filtration. Desalination, 188, pp. 213-216 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2005.04.119
  3. Chon, K., Moon, J., Kim, S., Kim, S. D., and Cho, J. (2007). Bio-particle separation using microfluidic porous plug for environmental monitoring. Desalination, 202, pp. 215-223 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2005.12.057
  4. Dulog, L. and Schauer, T. (1996). Field flow fractionation for particle size determination. Progress in Organic Coatings, 28, pp. 25-31 https://doi.org/10.1016/0300-9440(95)00584-6
  5. Giddings, J. C. (1991). Unified separation science, New York, John Wiley & Sons, Inc
  6. Giddings, J. C. (1993). Field-Flow Fractionation: analysis of macromolecular, colloidal, and particulate materials. Science, 260, pp. 1456-1465 https://doi.org/10.1126/science.8502990
  7. Giddings, J. C. (1997). Factors influencing accuracy of colloidal and macro-molecular properties measured by fieldflow fractionation. Anal. Che., 69, pp. 552-557 https://doi.org/10.1021/ac960932e
  8. Hansen, M. E., Giddings, J. C., and Beckett, R. (1989). Colloid characterization by sedimentation field-flow fractionation: VI. Perturbations due to overloading and electrostatic repulsion. J. Colloid Interface Sci, 132(2), pp. 300-312 https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9797(89)90245-2
  9. Hartmann, R. L., Williams, R., and Kim, S. (2002). Flow field-flow fractions as an analytical technique to rapidly quantitate membrane fouling. Journal of Membrane Science, 209, pp. 93-106 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0376-7388(02)00280-6
  10. Hassellov, M., Lyven, B., Haraldssonn, C., and Sirinawin, W. (1999). Determination of continuous size and trace element distribution of colloidal material in natural water by online coupling of flow field-flow fractionation with ICPMS. Anal. Chem, 71, pp. 3497-3502 https://doi.org/10.1021/ac981455y
  11. Jiang, Y., Miller, M. E., Li, P., and Hansen, M. E. (2000). Characterization of water-soluble polymers by flow FFFMALS. Am. Lab., 32(3), pp. 98-109
  12. Kim, D. H., Moon, J., and Cho, J., (2005). Identification of natural organic matter transport behavior near the membrane surface using flow field-flow-fractionation (Fl-FFF) micro channel. Journal of Water Supply: Research and Technology-AQUA, 54(4), pp. 249-259
  13. Kirkland, J. J., Dilks Jr., C. H., and Rementer, S. W. (1992). Molecular weight distributions of water-soluble polymers by flow field-flow fractionation. Anal. Chem., 64, pp. 1295-1303 https://doi.org/10.1021/ac00035a018
  14. Moon, M. H. (1995). Effect of Carrier Solutions on article Retention in Flow Field-Flow Fractionation. Bull. Korean. Chem Soc., 16, pp. 7
  15. Moon, J. and Cho, J. (2005). Investigation of nano-colloid transport in UF membranes using flow field-flow fractionation (flow FFF) and an irreversible thermodynamic transport model. Desalination, 179, pp. 151-159 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2004.11.063
  16. Moon, J., Kim, S. H., and Cho, J. (2006). Characterizations of natural organic matter as nano particle using flow fieldflow fractionation. Colloids and Surfaces, 287, pp. 232-236 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfa.2006.05.046
  17. Reschiglian, P., Zattoni, A., Roda, B., and Casolari, S. (2002). Bacteria Sorting by Field-Flow Fractionation. Application to Whole-Cell Escherichia coli Vaccine Strains. Anal. Chem., 74, pp. 4895-4904 https://doi.org/10.1021/ac020199t
  18. Schimpf, M. E., Caldwell, K., and Giddings, J. C. (2000). Field-Flow Fractionation Handbook (ed), New York, Wiley
  19. Wright, S., Ranville, J., and Amy, G. (2001). Relating complex solute mixture characteristics to membrane fouling. Water Science and Technology, 1(5), pp. 31-38