Journal of Korean Society on Water Environment (한국물환경학회지)

Korean Society on Water Environment (한국물환경학회)
권호 표지

Evaluating Calibration Methods of Stream Flow for Water Quality Management

수질학적 관점에서의 수문모델 유출량 보정 방법 평가

  • Jeon, Ji-Hong (Department of Environmental Engineering, Andong National University) ;
  • Choi, Donghyuk (Department of Environmental Engineering, Andong National University) ;
  • Kim, Jung-Jin (Department of Environmental Engineering, Andong National University) ;
  • Kim, Taedong (Department of Environmental Engineering, Andong National University)
  • 전지홍 (국립안동대학교 환경공학과) ;
  • 최동혁 (국립안동대학교 환경공학과) ;
  • 김정진 (국립안동대학교 환경공학과) ;
  • 김태동 (국립안동대학교 환경공학과)
  • Received : 2008.10.06
  • Accepted : 2009.04.15
  • Published : 2009.05.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The effect of selecting hydrologic item for calculating objective function on calibration of stream flow was evaluated by Hydrologic Simulation Porgram-Fortran (HSPF) linked with Model Independent Parameter Optimizer (PEST). Daily and monthly stream flow and flow duration were used to calculate objective function. Automated calibration focused on monthly stream was proper to analyze seasonal or yearly water budget but not proper to predict daily stream flow or percent chance flow exceeded. Calibration result focused on flow duration is proper to predict precent chance flow exceeded but not proper to analyze water budget or predict peak flow. These results indicate that hydrologic item calculated for objective function on calibration procedure could influence calibration results and watershed modeler should select carefully hydrologic item for the purpose of model application. Current, the criteria of stream flow of Korean TMDL is generated based on percent chance flow exceeded, so flow duration should be included to calculate objective function on calibration procedure for the estimation of criteria of stream flow using hydrologic model.

Keywords

References

  1. 국립환경연구원(2004). 수계오염총량관리기술지침. 행정간행물 등록번호 11-1480083-000148-01. 국립환경과학원. 환경부
  2. 농어촌연구원(2001). 새만금유역 수문연구 보고서. 농어촌연구원. 한국농촌공사
  3. 농어촌연구원(2002). 새만금유역 수문연구 보고서. 농어촌연구원. 한국농촌공사
  4. 신아현(2008). BASINS/WinHSPF를 이용한 충주댐 유역의 댐 모의 및 비점오염 저감방안 연구. 석사학위논문, 건국대학교
  5. 윤춘경, 신아현, 정광욱, 장재호(2007a). BASINS/WinHSPF를 이용한 남한강 상류유역의 비점오염원 저감효율 평가. 수질보전 한국물환경학회지, 23(6), pp. 951-960
  6. 윤춘경, 한정윤, 정광욱, 장재호(2007b). 소양강댐 유역의 오염부하량 산정을 위한 BASINS/WinHSPF 적용. 한국육수학회지, 40(2), pp. 201-213
  7. 정광욱, 윤춘경, 장재호, 김형철(2007). BASINS/HSPF를 이용한 화성유역 오염부하량의 정량적 평가. 한국농공학회지, 49(2), pp. 61-74 https://doi.org/10.5389/KSAE.2007.49.2.061
  8. 장재호, 윤춘경, 정광욱, 전지홍(2006). BASINS/HSPF를 이용한 용담댐유역의 오염부하량 산정. 한국육수학회지, 39(2), pp. 187-197
  9. 황하선(2007). 우리나라 수질오염총량관리제에 있어 유역특성을 고려한 BASINS/WinHSPF의 적용성 연구-낙동강 수계를 중심으로. 박사학위논문, 건국대학교
  10. Brun, S. E. and Band, L. E. (2000). Simulating runoff behavior in an urbanizing watershed. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 24(1), pp. 5-22 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0198-9715(99)00040-X
  11. Chanasyk, D. S., Mapfumo, E., and Willms, W. (2003). Quantification and simulation of surface runoff from fescue grassland watersheds. Agricultural Water Management, 59, pp. 137-153 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-3774(02)00124-5
  12. Choi, W. and Deal, B. M. (2008). Assessing hydrological impact of potential land use change through hydrological and land use change modeling for the Kiswaukee River basin (USA). Journal of Environmental Management, 88(4), pp. 1119-1130 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2007.06.001
  13. Cho, J., Barone, V. A., and Mostaghimi, S. (2008). Simulation of land use impacts on groundwater levels and streamflow in a Virginia watershed. Agricultural Water Management, (In Press), Available online 23 August 2008 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2008.07.005
  14. Doherty, J. (2005). PEST: Model Independent Parameter Estimation. fifth edition of user manual. Watermark Numerical Computing, Brisbane, Australia
  15. Doherty, J. and Skahill, B. E. (2006). An advanced regularization methodology for use in watershed model calibration. Journal of Hydrology, 327, pp. 564-577 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2005.11.058
  16. Donigian, Jr. A. S., Chinnaswamy, R. V., and Jobes, T. H., (1997). Conceptual Design of Multipurpose Detention Facilities for Flood Protection and Nonpoint Source Pollution Control. AQUA TERRA Consultants, Mountain View, California, USA
  17. Donigian, Jr. A. S. (2002). Watershed model calibration and validation: The HSPF Experience. WEF Speciality Conference Proceedings. November 13-16, 2002. Phoenix, AZ. WEF National TMDL Science and Policy 2002
  18. Gaza, M. and McCray, J. E. (2008). Effects of soil data resolution on SWAT model stream flow and water quality predictions. Journal of Environmental Management, 88, pp. 393-406 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2007.03.016
  19. Hunter, H. M. and Walton, R. S. (2008). Land-use effects on fluxes of suspended sediment, nitrogen and phosphorus from a river catchment of the Great Barrier Reef, Australia. Journal of Hydrology, 356(1-2), pp. 131-146 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2008.04.003
  20. Jeon, J. H., Yoon, C. G., Donigian, Jr., A. S., and Jung, K. W. (2007). Development of the HSPF-Paddy model to estimate watershed pollutant loads in paddy farming regions. Agricultural Water Management, 90, pp 75-86 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2007.02.006
  21. Jeon, J. H., Yoon, C. G., Ham, J. H., and Jung, K. W. (2006). Evaluation of BASINS/WinHSPF applicability for pollutant loading estimation for a Korean watershed. Water Science and Technology, 53(1), pp. 25-32 https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2006.004
  22. Jewell, T. K., Nunno, T. J., and Adrian, D. D. (1978). Methodology for calibrating stormwater models. Journal of the Environmental Engineering Division, 104, pp. 485
  23. Jung, K. W. (2007). Development of 3D Intergratted Water Quality Silmulation System by Applying Basins/WinHSPF And EFDC in Han River Basin and Paldang Reservoir. Ph.D. Dissertation, Konkuk University, Korea
  24. Kim, S. M., Benham, B. L., Brannan K. M., Zeckoski, R. W., and Doherty, J. (2007). Comparison of hydrologic calibration of HSPF using automatic and manual methods. Water Resource Research, 42(11), pp. 1561-1570 https://doi.org/10.1029/2006WR004883
  25. Luo, B., Li, J. B., Huang, G. H., and Li, H. J. (2006). A simulation-based interval two-stage stochastic model for agricultural nonpoint source pollution control through land retirement. Science of The Total Environment, 361(1-3), pp. 38-56 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2005.09.053
  26. Nash, J. E. and Sutcliffe, J. V. (1970). River flow forecasting through conceptual model. Part 1. A discussion of principles. Journal of Hydrology, 10, pp. 282-290 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1694(70)90255-6
  27. Ribarova, I., Ninov, P., and Cooper, D. (2008). Modeling nutrient pollution during a first flood event using HSPF software: Iskar River case study, Bulgaria. Ecological Modelling, 211(1-2), pp. 241-246 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2007.09.022
  28. Sheomaker, L., Lahlou, M., Bryer, M., Kumar, D., and Kratt, K. (1997). Compendium of tool for watershed assessment and TMDL development. EPA841-B-97-006. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Water, Washington, DC, USA
  29. Skahill, B. E. and Doherty, J. (2006). Efficient accommodation of local minima in watershed model calibration. Journal of Hydrology, 329, pp. 122-139 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2006.02.005