Consumer Willingness to Pay Price Premium for Certified Wood Products in South Korea

  • Cha, Junhee (Research Institute for Agriculture and Life Sciences, Seoul National University) ;
  • Chun, Jung-Nam (Department of Forest Sciences, Seoul National University,) ;
  • YOUN, Yeo-Chang (Department of Forest Sciences, Seoul National University)
  • Received : 2009.03.16
  • Accepted : 2009.04.07
  • Published : 2009.04.30

Abstract

The study was conducted to examine consumers' awareness and perceptions on forest certification and their willingness to buy and pay price premium for certified wood products especially for selected four wood products. A total of 136 residents in Seoul and Gyeonggi Province were interviewed in the autumn of 2008. Although only 24.3 percent of the consumers are aware of forest certification, 82.4 percent of the respondents recognized the need and significance of forest certification. In general, 77.2 percent of the respondents were willing to buy certified wood products. Majority of the respondents, 84 out of 136 respondents (61.8%) expressed their willingness to pay (WTP) from more than 0 percent to less than 10 percent. Consumers' average WTP for certified wood products was estimated to be 5.6 percent. From the results of the study, lower priced wood products, such as copier paper (WTP=9.8%) and wood frame (WTP=11.6%), have higher price premiums than high priced products, such as wood table (WTP=6.8%) and wood flooring (WTP=7.6%). In conclusion, there could be feasible markets for certified wood products in South Korea as four out of five consumer are willing to pay more for such products. For the forest certification system to be adopted and widely accepted, the perceptions of forest stakeholders including consumers should be further increased.

Keywords

References

  1. Aguilar, F.X. and Vlosky, R.P. 2007. Consumer will ingness to pay price premiums for environmentally certified wood products in the U.S. Forest Policy and Economics 9(2007): 1100-1112 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2006.12.001
  2. Baharuddin, H.J. and Simula, M. 1994. Certification Schemes for all Timber and Timber Products. ITTO, Yokohama, Japan
  3. Bong, I.S. and Lee, H.S. 2006. A Study on the Improvement of Housing Condition Disparity regarding Inter-zonal Income Level in Gyeonggi Province. Gyeonggi Research Institute, Report no. 2006-14
  4. Carter D.R. and Merry F.D. 1998. The Nature and Statue of Certification in the United States. Forest Prod. J. 48(2): 23-28
  5. Cha, J. 2003. Stake-holders’ Perceptions on Forest Certification with a Special Reference to Forest Owners,Wood Products Manufacturers and Consumers. Master dissertation. Graduate School, Seoul National University
  6. Field, B.C. 1994. Environmental Economics: An Introduction. McGraw-Hill, Inc., New York
  7. FSC. 2009. Forest Stewardship Council. http://www.fsc.org/
  8. Harrison, R.W. and Mclennon, E. 2004. Analysis of consumer preferences for biotech labeling formats. Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics 36(1):151-171
  9. Jensen, K.L., Jakus, P.M., English, B.C., Menard, J.2004. Consumers' Willingness to Pay for Eco-Certified Wood Products. Journal of Agriculture and Applied Economics
  10. Joo, R.W. and Lee, S.Y. 2000. The Potential Impacts of Recent Development in Timber Certification Schemes on the Korean Forest Products trade. Jour. Korean For. Soc. 89(3): 368-377
  11. KCCI. 2009. Korea Chamber of Commerce and Industry.http://www.korcham.net/
  12. KFS. 2008. Statistical Yearbook of Forestry No.38 (2008). Korea Forest Service
  13. Laroche, M., J. Bergero and G. Barbarot-Forleo. 2001. Targeting consumers who are willing to pay more for environmentally friendly products. J. Consumer Market 18: 503-520 https://doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000006155
  14. Lee, S.Y., Youn, Y.C., Joo R.W., and Yang, I. 2007a.Forest Certification Scheme: Perceptions and Willingness-to-pay of Consumers and Manufacturers in South Korea. Jour. Korean For. Soc. 96(2): 183-188
  15. Lee, S.Y., Joo, R.W., and Yang, I. 2007b. The Perspective of Forest Certification in South Korea: Case Study of Questionnaire for Forest Products Manufacturers and Consumers. Jour. Korean For. Soc. 96(5): 533-538
  16. Mohamed, S. and Ibrahim, M.L. 2007. Preliminary Study on Willingness to Pay for Environmentally Certified Wood Products Among Consumers in Malaysia. J. of Applied Sciences 7(9): 1339-1342 https://doi.org/10.3923/jas.2007.1339.1342
  17. Ozanne, L.K. and Vlosky R.P. 2003. Certification from the U.S. consumer perspective: A comparison from 1995 and 2000. Forest Prod. J. 53(3): 13-21
  18. Ozanne, L.K. and Vlosky R.P. 1997. Willingness to pay for environmentally certified wood products: A consumer perspective. Forest Prod. J. 47(6): 39-47
  19. PEFC. 2009. Programme for the Endorsement of Forest Certification. http://www.pefc.org/
  20. Perera, P. and Vlosky, R.P. 2006. A History of Forest Certification. Louisiana Forest Products Development Center Working Paper No.71
  21. Upton, C. and Bass, S. 1995. The forest certification handbook. Earthscan Publications Limited, London,United Kingdom
  22. Veisten, K. 2007. Willingness to pay for eco-labeled wood furniture: Choice-based conjoint analysis versus open-ended conjoint valuation. Journal of Forest Economics 13(2007): 29-48 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfe.2006.10.002
  23. Youn, Y.C. et al. 2004. Factor Analysis of Forest Rehabilitation Success and Failure Case Study. Korea Forest Service