Secondary Breast Reconstruction

이차 유방 재건술

  • Ahn, Hee Chang (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery College of Medicine, Hanyang University) ;
  • Ahn, Yong Su (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery College of Medicine, Hanyang University) ;
  • Kim, Youn Hwan (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery College of Medicine, Hanyang University) ;
  • Choi, Seung Suk (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery College of Medicine, Hanyang University)
  • 안희창 (한양대학교 의과대학 성형외과학 교실) ;
  • 안용수 (한양대학교 의과대학 성형외과학 교실) ;
  • 김연환 (한양대학교 의과대학 성형외과학 교실) ;
  • 최승석 (한양대학교 의과대학 성형외과학 교실)
  • Published : 2009.11.15

Abstract

Purpose: Secondary breast reconstruction is defined as a whole reconstructive procedure to correct complications and to improve the aesthetics when a patient is dissatisfied with her initial reconstruction. We would like to present these particular procedures on previously failed breast reconstruction with analysis of unsatisfactory results. Methods: From June 2002 to August 2008, we performed secondary breast reconstructions for 10 patients with failed breasts. Six patients with implant failure underwent secondary breast reconstructions using free TRAM flaps after the removal of implants. Two patients with partial loss of pedicled TRAM flaps underwent secondary breast reconstruction using Latissimus Dorsi flaps. Two patients with 1 total loss of free TRAM flap and 1 extensive fat necrosis underwent secondary breast reconstruction using implants. Results: The average age of the patients were 36.4 years (26 ~ 47 years). All flaps survived completely and had relatively good aesthetic results in free TRAM cases. There was breast asymmetry in one patient using cohesive gell implants in total loss of previously free TRAM patient, which was corrected by exchanging the implants and placing dermofat grafts. Conclusion: Secondary breast reconstruction differs from primary procedures in several aspects; there are changes in the anatomy and tissue environment of the breasts, and various limitations in choosing reconstruction methods. In addition, the patients may be uncomfortable with previous complication. It is important to consider various factors before deciding to undergo a secondary breast reconstruction carefully with informed consent.

Keywords

References

  1. Lin KY, Johns FR, Gibson J, Long M, Drake DB, Moore MM: An outcome study of breast reconstruction: Presurgical identification of factors for complication. Ann Surg Oncol 8: 586, 2001 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10434-001-0586-3
  2. Spear SL, Newman MK, Bedford MS, Schwartz KA, Cohen M, Schwartz JS: A retrospective analysis of outcomes using three common methods for immediate breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 122: 340, 2008 https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e31817d6009
  3. Kroll SS, Baldwin B: A comparison of outcomes using three different methods of breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 90: 455, 1992 https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-199209000-00015
  4. Alderman AK, Wilkins EG, Lowery JC, Kim M, Davis JA: Determinants of patient satisfaction in postmastectomy breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 106: 769, 2000 https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-200009040-00003
  5. Mathes SJ, Alkureishi L: Secondary breast reconstruction. 2nd ed, Philadelphia, Saunders Elasevier, p 1083, 2006
  6. Nahabedian M, Tsangaris T, Momen B, Manson PN: Infectious complications following breast reconstruction with expanders and implants. Plast Reconstr Surg 112: 467, 2002 https://doi.org/10.1097/01.PRS.0000070727.02992.54
  7. Kroll SS, Marchi M: Comparison of strategies for preventing abdominal-wall weakness after TRAM flap breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 89: 1045, 1992 https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-199206000-00007
  8. Kroll SS, Gherardini G, Martin JE, Reece GP, Miller MJ, Evans GR, Robb GL, Wang BG: Fat necrosis in free and pedicled TRAM flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg 102: 1502, 1998 https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-199810000-00024
  9. Delay E, Gounot N, Bouillot A, Zlatoff P, Rivoire M: Autologous latissimus breast reconstruction: A 3-year clinical experience with 100 patients. Plast Reconstr Surg 102: 1461, 1998 https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-199810000-00020
  10. Hammond DC, Simon AM, Khuthaila DK, Hoberman L, Sohn S: Latissimus dorsi flap salvage of the partially failed TRAM flap breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 120: 382, 2007 https://doi.org/10.1097/01.prs.0000267327.88506.54
  11. Kroll S, Netscher DT: Complications of TRAM flap breast reconstruction in obese patients. Plast Reconstr Surg 84: 886, 1989 https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-198912000-00003
  12. Allen RJ, Tucker C Jr: Superior gluteal artery perforator free flap for breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 95: 1207, 1995 https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-199506000-00010