A Study on Catalysts for Simultaneous Removal of 1,2-Dichlorobenzene and NOx

1,2-Dichlorobenzene 및 질소산화물 동시제거를 위한 촉매연구

  • Park, Kwang Hee (Department of Environmental Engineering, Graduate School of Kyonggi University) ;
  • Hong, Sung Chang (Department of Environmental Engineering, Kyonggi University)
  • 박광희 (경기대학교대학원 환경에너지시스템공학과) ;
  • 홍성창 (경기대학교 환경에너지시스템공학과)
  • Received : 2009.06.11
  • Accepted : 2009.07.13
  • Published : 2009.10.10

Abstract

The catalytic oxidation of 1,2-dichloribenzene (1,2-DCB) and simultaneous catalytic reduction of nitrogen oxides over the single catalyst has been investigated over various metals (Ru, Mn, Co and Fe) supported on $Al_2O_3$ and $CeO_{2}$. The activity of the different catalysts for catalytic oxidation of 1,2-dichloribenzene depended on the used metal, Ru/Co/$Al_2O_3$, Mn-Fe/CeO2 and Cr/$Al_2O_3$ (commercial catalysts) being the most actives ones. In the catalytic oxidation of chlorobenzene (CB), Ru/Co/$Al_2O_3$ is better than Pt-Pd/$Al_2O_3$, which is the well-known catalyst good for VOC oxidation. Furthermore, it has a good durability on the deactivation by $Cl_2$ and sulfur. For nitrogen oxides (NOx) removal, NOx conversion was 70% at $260^{\circ}C$.

다양한 금속(Ru, Mn, Co, Fe)을 $Al_2O_3$$CeO_2$에 담지한 촉매를 이용하여 1,2-Dichlorobenzen (1,2-DCB) 제거를 위한 촉매산화 실험을 실시하였다. 이와 더불어 동시에 NOx 제거가 이루어져 단일 촉매층에서 산화/환원 이원 기능이 가능한 촉매를 연구하고자 하였다. 실험결과 1,2-DCB 산화제거효율은 Ru/Co/$Al_2O_3$, Mn-Fe/$CeO_{2}$, 상용촉매인 Cr/$Al_2O_3$ 순으로 나타났다. 또한 1,2-DCB 산화제거효율이 가장 우수하였던 Ru/Co/$Al_2O_3$는 Chlorobenzene (CB)의 분해실험에서도 VOC 제거에 있어서 잘 알려진 Pt-Pd/$Al_2O_3$ 보다 우수한 활성을 나타내었다. 또한 $Cl_2$와 같은 생성물에 의하여 활성의 저하 및 황에 대한 내피독성과 내구성에서 우수한 결과를 얻을 수 있었다. NOx 제거에 있어서도 $260^{\circ}C$에서 NOx 전환율이 70% 정도로 나타났다.

Keywords

References

  1. W. W. Jung, Korea Institute of Science and Technology, Research for the Environment, DIOXIN HANDBOOK, ed. Dong Hwa Technology Publishing, Seoul (1996)
  2. R. Weber, T. Sakurai, and H. Hagenmaier, Appl. Catal. B: Env., 20, 249 (1999) https://doi.org/10.1016/S0926-3373(98)00115-5
  3. U. S. Patent, 5,783,515 (1998)
  4. R. W. van den Brink, R. Louw, and P. Mulder, Appl. Catal. B: Env., 16, 219 (1998) https://doi.org/10.1016/S0926-3373(97)00076-3
  5. A. H. T. Jang, Y. K. Park, Y. S. Ko, and W. S. Cha, Korean Chem. Eng. Res., 46, 498(2008)
  6. S. Krishnamoorthy and M. D. Amiridis, Catal. Today, 51, 203 (1999) https://doi.org/10.1016/S0920-5861(99)00045-0
  7. S. Krishnamoorthy, J. P. Baker, and M. D. Amiridis, Catal. Today, 40, 39 (1998) https://doi.org/10.1016/S0920-5861(97)00117-X
  8. S. C. Hong, A Collection of Papers Presented at Kyonggi University, 50, 1 (2006)
  9. M. Legawiec-Jarzyna, A. Śrębowata, W. Juszczyk, and Z. Karpiski, Appl. Catal. A: Gen., 271, 61 (2004) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcata.2004.01.036
  10. C. Marecot, A. Fakche, B. Kellali, G. Mabilon, M. Prigent, and J. Barbier, Appl. Catal. B: Env, 3, 283 (1994) https://doi.org/10.1016/0926-3373(94)00003-4
  11. C. H. Cho, Ph. D. Dissertation, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, Daejeon, Korea (2001)
  12. J. J. Spivey and J. B. Butt, Catal. Today, 11, 465 (1992) https://doi.org/10.1016/0920-5861(92)80039-P
  13. H. Bosch and F. Janssen, Catal. Today, 2, 369 (1988) https://doi.org/10.1016/0920-5861(88)80002-6
  14. M. A. Larrubia and Guido Busca, Appl. Catal. B: Env., 39, 343 (2002) https://doi.org/10.1016/S0926-3373(02)00116-9
  15. Y. Liu, Z. Wei, Z. Feng, M. Luo, P. Yang, and C. Li, J. Catal., 202, 200 (2001) https://doi.org/10.1006/jcat.2001.3284
  16. G. Wielgosi\acute{n}ski, A. Grochowalski, T. Machej, T. Pająk, and W. \acute{C}wiąkalski, Chemosphere, 67, S150 (2007) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2006.05.097
  17. S. Albonetti, S. Blasioli, R. Bonelli, J. E. Mengou, S. Scir\grave{e}, and F. Trifir\grave{o}, Appl. Catal. A: Gen., 341, 18 (2008) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcata.2007.12.033