Quantitative Analysis of Lower Nose and Upper Lip Asymmetry in Patient with Unilateral Cleft Lip Nose Deformity using 3D camera

3D camera를 이용한 일측성 구순비변형환자에서의 비하부 및 상구순 비대칭의 정량적 분석

  • Oh, Tae suk (Department of Plastic Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan, College of Medicine) ;
  • Koh, Kyung suk (Department of Plastic Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan, College of Medicine) ;
  • Kim, Tae gon
  • 오태석 (울산대학교 의과대학 서울아산병원 성형외과) ;
  • 고경석 (울산대학교 의과대학 서울아산병원 성형외과) ;
  • 김태곤 (영남대학교 의과대학 영남대학교병원 성형외과)
  • Published : 2009.11.15

Abstract

Purpose: Analysis of lower nose and upper lip asymmetry in patients with unilateral cleft lip nose deformity has been proceeded through direct measurement and photo analysis. But there are limitation in presenting real image because of its 2 dimensional trait. The authors analyzed such an asymmetry using 3D VECTRA system (Canfield, NJ, USA) in quantitative way. Methods: In 25 Patients with unilateral cleft lip nose deformity(male 12, female 13, age ranging from 4 to 19), patients with right side deformity were 10 and left were 15. Analysis of asymmetry was proceeded through 3D VECTRA system. After taking 3 dimensional photo, alar area, upper lip area, nostril perimeter, nostril area, Cupid's bow length, nostril height and nostril width were measured. Correlation coefficient and inter data quotients were calculated. Results: In nostril perimeter, maximal difference of cleft side and non - cleft side was 39.3%, asymmetric quotient Qasy = Qcl/Qncl(Qcl, value of cleft side; Qncl, value of non - cleft side) was ranged from 0.84 to 1.85 and in seven cases the length of cleft side was smaller. In nostril area, maximal difference was 69.6% and in 13 cases cleft side was smaller. In lower nasal area, maximal difference was 37.2% asymmetric quotient Qasy = Qcl/Qncl was ranged from 0.47 to 2.03 and in 20 cases cleft side was smaller. The correlation coefficients of nostril perimeter and area were 0.8345. Conclusion: Using 3D VECTRA system, the authors can measure nostril perimeter and lower nasal area that could not been measured with previous methods. Asymmetry of midface was analyzed through area comparison in quantitative way. Futhermore, post operative change can be measured in quantitative method.

Keywords

References

  1. Cussons PD, Murison MS, Fernandez AE, Pigott RW: A panel based assessment of early versus no nasal correction of the cleft lip, Br J Oral Surg 46: 7, 1993
  2. Farkas LG, Hreczko TA, Deutsch CK: Objective assessment of standard nostril types -a morphometric study. Ann Plast Surg 11: 381, 1983
  3. Girod S, Teschner M, Schrell U, Kevekordes B, Girod B: Computer-aided 3-D simulation and prediction of craniofacial surgery: a new approach, J Maxillofac Surg 29: 156, 2001
  4. Duffy S, Noar JH, Evans RD, Sanders R: Three-dimensional analysis of the child cleft face. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 37: 137, 2000 https://doi.org/10.1597/1545-1569(2000)037<0137:TDAOTC>2.3.CO;2
  5. Cutting CB, Bardach J, Pang R: A comparative study of the skin envelope of the unilateral cleft lip nose subsequent to rotation-advancement and triangular flap lip repairs. Plast Reconstr Surg 84: 409, 1989 https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-198909000-00004
  6. Moyer HR, Carlson GW, Styblo TM, Losken A: Three- dimensional digital evaluation of breast symmetry after breast conservation therapy. J Am Coll Surg 207: 227, 2008 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2008.02.012
  7. Oh AK, Wong J, Ohta E, Rogers GF, Deutsch CK, Mulliken JB: Facial asymmetry in unilateral coronal synostosis: long-term results after fronto-orbital advancement. Plast Reconstr Surg 121: 555, 2008
  8. Yamada T, Mori Y, Minami K, Mishima K, Sugahara T, Sakuda M: Computer aided three-dimensional analysis of nostril forms: application in normal and operated cleft lip patients. J CranioMaxillofac Surg 27: 345, 1999 https://doi.org/10.1054/jcms.1999.0097
  9. Bush K, Antonyshyn O: Three-dimensional acial anthropometry using a laser surface scanner: validation of the technique. Plast Reconstr Surg 98: 226, 1996 https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-199608000-00004