The assessment of health risk and subjective symptoms of printing workers exposed to mixed organic solvents

인쇄업 종사자의 혼합유기용제 노출로 인한 자각증상 및 위해성 평가

  • Kim, Yeong-Mee (Korea Occupational Safety and Health Agency) ;
  • Kim, Hyunwook (Dept. of Preventive Medicine, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea)
  • 김영미 (한국산업안전보건공단) ;
  • 김현욱 (가톨릭대학교 의과대학 예방의학교실)
  • Received : 2009.03.16
  • Accepted : 2009.07.20
  • Published : 2009.09.30

Abstract

In order to check a necessity of health control for the laborers who are in use of mixed organic solvents in the printing industries, this study evaluated the use status of mixed organic solvents, health subjective symptoms on the exposure of the solvents, health hazard for each kind of printings for the employees who work for the printing industries located in Seoul and Gyeonggi. The study analyzed 228 sites and 311 people responded of the total 250 sites surveyed from March to September 2007, and obtained the following results; 1) Estimating the exposure of the mixed organic solvents, the study found that estimation of mixture(EM) was different for each kind of printings at a level of significance, excessiveness of EM was 7.5%, the highest, for gravure printing, 5.6% for screen printing, 4.7% for master printing, 2.9% for offset printing. 2) As to the mean scores of health subjective symptoms for each kind of printings, workers in screen printing showed high scores in every subjective symptom, of which symptom of central nervous system was 3.75, the highest, and the difference was statistically at a level of significance(p<0.01). 3) Results of the hazard analysis for carcinogens and non-carcinogens contained in the mixed organic solvents exposed to the workers showed that cancer risk of offset printing workers was $7.8{\times}10^{-9}$ for benzene, the mean cancer risk was $2.02.{\times}10^{-8}$ from Monte-Carlo simulation, and both risks did not exceed the US EPA permissible standard of $1{\times}10^{-6}$. The total hazard indices of the non-carcinogens estimated was 3.523, the highest, for gravure printing, 2.381 for master printing, 1.125 for screen printing, respectively, and all exceeded 1.

Keywords

References

  1. 변상훈, 유인성, 손종렬. 일부 인쇄업 근로자의 유기용제 및 소음 노출에 관한 연구. 한국위생학회지 1998;13(2):66- 71
  2. 김수근. 임현술. 김정만. 박동현. 하은희. 사업장보건관리를 위한 산업별, 공정별, 작업종류별 표준산업보건일람표 작성연구. 산업안전보건연구원, 1999
  3. EU. Research in Health & Safety at work, Organic solvent, Euro Review 1996
  4. Triebig G, Hallermann J. Survey of solvent related chronic encephalopathy as an occupational disease in European countries. Occup Environ Med 2001;58(9):575-81 https://doi.org/10.1136/oem.58.9.575
  5. Crouch KG, Gressel MG. The control of press cleaning solvent vapors in a small lithographic printing establishment. Appl Occup Environ Hyg 1999;14:329-38 https://doi.org/10.1080/104732299302918
  6. 강성규, 김규상, 김양호, 최정근, 안연순. 8년간 산업안전보건 연구원에 의뢰된 직업병 심의 사례 분석. 한국산업위생학회지 1999;12(2):292-301
  7. 노동부. 화학물질 및 물리적인자의 노출기준. 노동부 고시 제2007-25호 2007
  8. 노동부. 산업안전보건법 2007
  9. 노동부, 2004년 전국제조업체 작업환경실태조사 2005
  10. 한국산업안전공단 산업보건연구원. 한국사회의 산업안전보건정책연구2001
  11. 한국산업안전공단 서울지역본부. 인쇄업 종사자의 작업형태에 따른 화학물질 노출실태 및 폭로저감방안에 관한연구 2006
  12. 정광호, 문덕환, 이채언, 김성천, 백낙환. 그라비아 인쇄공장의 작업환경실태 및 유기용제 폭로에 의한 건강장해. Inje Med J. 1992;13(4):533-43
  13. 최호춘, 김강윤, 안선희, 정규철. 일부 그라비아 인쇄업 근로자의 혼합유기용제 노출농도.한국산업위생학회지 1997;7(1):71-85
  14. 김순영. 단시간 노출농도 측정을 통한 옵셋 인쇄작업장의 유기용제 노출평가. 고려대학교 보건대학원 2000
  15. 김효규. 옵셋 인쇄업 작업자들의 유기용제 노출특성에 관한연구. 서울대학교 대학원 2007
  16. De Rosa E, Brugnone F, Bartiolucci GB, perbellini L, Bellomo ML, Gori GP, Sigon M, Chiesura P. The validity of urinary metabolites as indicators of low exposure to toluene. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 1985;56(2):135-45 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00379385
  17. Nise G. Urinary excretion of o-cresol and hippuric acid after toluene exposure in rotogravure printing. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 1992;63(6):377-81 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00386931
  18. Monster AC, Kezic S, Van de Gevel I, de Wolff FA. Evaluation of biological monitoring parameters for occupational exposure to toluene. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 1993;65(1):159-62 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00381331
  19. Svendesen K. Srognes K, Exposure to organic solvents in the offset printing industry in Norway. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J. 2000;44(2):119-24 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-4878(99)00064-2
  20. EU. Research in Health & Safety at work, Organic solvent, Euro Review 1996
  21. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. ntegrated Risk Information System Guidance Documents. 2005
  22. 김수영. 건식세탁업자의 유기용제폭로와 자각증상. 충남대학교 석사학위논문 1997
  23. 이광성. 자동차 정비공의 혈액 및 뇨검사 소견과 자각증상에대한 조사. 충남대학교 석사학위논문 1996
  24. 정재식. 항공기 정비조종사의 건강자각증상과 VOC 노출 위해도에 관한 연구. 연세대학교 대학원 2005
  25. 박동욱. 박덕묵. 정광수. 윤충식. 김태형. 노영만. 이경남. 이송권. 김현욱. 위험성 평가에 의한 업종별 위험의 구분. 한국산업위생학회지 2003;13(2):126-34
  26. Ruden C. Scrutinizing ACGIH Risk Asessments: The trichloethyene case. Am J Ind Med 2003;44:207-213 https://doi.org/10.1002/ajim.10252
  27. Rappaport SM. Threshold limit values, permissible exposure limits, and feasibility. The bases for exposure limit in the United States. Am J Ind Med 1993;23(5):683-694 https://doi.org/10.1002/ajim.4700230502
  28. Kotseva K. Occupational exposure to low conc of cabon disulfide as a risk factor for hypercholesterolaemia. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 2001;74:38-42 https://doi.org/10.1007/s004200000186
  29. 강지훈. 톨루엔 취급 근로자의 건강위해성평가. 전북대학교 석사학위논문 2004
  30. Castorina R, Woodruff TJ. Assessment of potential risk levels associated with U.S Environmental Protection Agency reference values. Environ Health Perspect 2003;111(10);1318- 1325 https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.6185