A Study on the Factors Affecting Asbestos Exposure Level from Asbestos Abatement in Building Demolition Sites

석면 해체·제거시 공기 중 노출수준과 영향요인

  • Kim, Ji-Yeong (Institute of Industrial Health, Daegu Haany University) ;
  • Lee, Song-Kwon (Faculty of Health Science, College of Health & Therapy, Daegu Haany University) ;
  • Lee, Jeong Hee (Faculty of Health Science, College of Health & Therapy, Daegu Haany University) ;
  • Lim, Mu Heok (Institute of Industrial Health, Daegu Haany University) ;
  • Kang, Sungwook (Faculty of Health Science, College of Health & Therapy, Daegu Haany University) ;
  • Phee, Young Gyu (Faculty of Health Science, College of Health & Therapy, Daegu Haany University)
  • 김지영 (대구한의대학교 산업보건연구소) ;
  • 이송권 (대구한의대학교 보건치료대학 보건학부) ;
  • 이정희 (대구한의대학교 보건치료대학 보건학부) ;
  • 임무혁 (대구한의대학교산업보건연구소) ;
  • 강성욱 (대구한의대학교 보건치료대학 보건학부) ;
  • 피영규 (대구한의대학교 보건치료대학 보건학부)
  • Received : 2008.12.16
  • Accepted : 2009.02.20
  • Published : 2009.03.31

Abstract

This study was examined to find out asbestos exposure level the factors which affected the level at asbestos abatement sites. We visited a total of thirteen building demolition sites(3 apartments, 3 schools, 4 stores, and 3 houses) were visited to collect samples and related data from August to November, 2006. The results of this study were as follows 1. The results of an analysis of bulk samples to identify types of asbestos at the asbestos abatement sites showed that the kinds of the asbestos detected were chrysotile by 50.0%, were tremolite by 2.6%, and were the contents of chrysotile by 3 to 20%. 2. The geometric mean concentration of asbestos was 0.007 f/cc(range 0.001-0.34 f/cc) and its geometric standard deviation was 5.83. Of the samples, however, 12 exceeded the Korean Occupational Exposure Limit(0.1f/cc). 3. Of the materials, textile material had the highest concentration with geometric mean of 0.016 f/cc. When asbestos-containing materials were removed using T type tools, the geometric mean concentration of asbestos was 0.061 f/cc. The level by this method was much higher than by other removal methods. In analysis by the type of building, the geometric mean concentration of asbestos in stores was 0.042 f/cc and was higher than in other buildings. 4. The Poisson regression analysis was applied to find out the factors that affect the airborne asbestos concentration. As a result of the analysis, removal using a T type tool was the most important factor affecting the asbestos concentration(p<0.01). In conclusion, the airborne asbestos concentration(geometric mean) in asbestos abatement sites was 0.007 f/cc(0.001~0.34 f/cc), and 12(14.6%) of all samples were over the 0.1 f/cc. These results showed that asbestos abatement workers have been exposed to the high level of airborne asbestos because they have not been keeping asbestos removal rule. In accordance with increases of the number of building demolition sites, the better government regulation on asbestos abatement methods should be made and be performed well at building demolition sites.

Keywords

References

  1. 노동부a. 석면관리 종합대책, 2007
  2. 노동부b. 화학물질 및 물리적 인자의 노출기준(노동부 고시 제2007-25호) 2007
  3. 노동부. 산업안전보건법, 2008
  4. 문지영, 김현욱. 서울 시내 일부 주차장의 공기 중 섬유농도 에 영향을 미치는 인자 분석, 한국산업위생학회지. 1994;4(2):157-167
  5. 유성환. 건축재료에서 발생되는 석면입자의 특성 연구. 한국대기보전학회지. 1993;9(3):191-199
  6. 유찬영, 노재훈, 정호근, 김치년. 서울시 지하철 역사 내부 설비 공사에 따른 석면의 실내공기질 관리 실태. 한국산업위생학회지. 2002;12(3):178-186
  7. 장승희: 건축물 해체 작업에 따른 석면의 관리실태 연구, 보건학 석사학위논문 서울대학교. 2006(1-26쪽)
  8. 최정근. 백도명, 백남원. 우리나라의 석면 생산과 사용 및 근로자 수와 노출농도의 변화. 한국산업위생학회지. 1998;8(2):242-253
  9. 최충곤, 김치년, 임남구, 노영만, 노재훈. 건축물 해체 작업 시 발생되는 석면의 노출 수준. 한국산업위생학회지. 2002;12(3):195-201
  10. Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. 2001
  11. Browne K. The controlled use approach for asbestos-A scientific update on health effect. International conference on asbestos products. Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. 1991
  12. Becklake M.R. Asbestos-related diseases of the lung and other organs. Their epidemiology and implications for clinical practice. Am Rev Respir Dis, 114: 187-227, 1976
  13. Camus, M, Siemiatycki J, Meek B.: Nonoccupational exposure to chrysotile asbestos and the risk of lung cancer, The new England Journal of Medicine. 1998;338(22):1565-1571 https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199805283382201
  14. Environmental Protection Agency(EPA). Method for the determination of asbestos in bulk building materials. 1993
  15. John H.Lange. Impact of asbestos concentrations in floor tiles on exposure during removal, international journal of environmental health research. 2002 https://doi.org/10.1080/0960312021000056401
  16. Langer A.M, Nolan R.P, Chrysotile:Its occurrence and properties as variables controlling biological effects, Annals Occupational Hygiene. 1994;38(4):427-451 https://doi.org/10.1093/annhyg/38.4.427
  17. National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health(NIOSH): Method 7400 Asbestos and other fibers by PCM. 1993
  18. Rappaport S. Assessment of long-term exposures to toxic substances. Ann Occup Hyg. 1991;35:61-121 https://doi.org/10.1093/annhyg/35.1.61
  19. Robert A. Perkins, John Hargesheimer, and Walter Fourie : Asbestos Release from whole-building Demolition of Buildings with Asbestos-Containing Material, Journal of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene, 2007;4:889-894 https://doi.org/10.1080/15459620701691023