Reattachment of amputated auricle using postauricular subcutaneous pocket

귓바퀴 뒤 포켓을 이용한 절단된 외이의 재접합

  • Jang, Ju Yun (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Dankook University College of Medicine) ;
  • Kang, Dong Hee (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Dankook University College of Medicine) ;
  • Lee, Chi Ho (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Dankook University College of Medicine) ;
  • Oh, Sang Ah (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Dankook University College of Medicine)
  • 장주윤 (단국대학교 의과대학 성형외과학교실) ;
  • 강동희 (단국대학교 의과대학 성형외과학교실) ;
  • 이치호 (단국대학교 의과대학 성형외과학교실) ;
  • 오상아 (단국대학교 의과대학 성형외과학교실)
  • Published : 2009.09.15

Abstract

Purpose: There are several modalities to reattach the amputated auricle. Microvascular replantation can achieve the best outcome, but technically difficult. Conventional composite graft is technically easy, but uniformly unsuccessful. Our successful experience of reattachment using postauricular subcutaneous pocket is presented. Methods: The amputated tissue was placed in its anatomical position with buried sutures. The amputated part is dermabraded to remove the epidermis and outer layer of dermis(Fig. 1, Center, left). Postauricular skin flap was then raised and the reattached dermabraded ear was buried beneath the flap(Fig. 1, Center, right). Two weeks after the original surgery, the buried ear was removed from its pocket (Fig. 1, Below, left). Results: The ear was reepithelialized spontaneously in 7 days. At 3 months, the reattached ear has satisfactory appearance without contour deformity(Fig. 1, Below, right). Conclusion: This technique provides increase in contact surface between the amputated segment and the surrounding tissues which supply blood, serum, oxygen and nutrients, maximizing the probability of "take". Minimally injured dermis can be healed from spontaneous reepithelialization and provides minimal contour deformity. We have used this non-microsurgical technique with very satisfying outcome.

Keywords

References

  1. Kind GM, Buncke GM, Placik OJ, Jansen DA, D'Amore T, Buncke HJ Jr: Total ear replantation. Plast Reconstr Surg 99: 1858, 1997 https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-199706000-00008
  2. Concannon MJ.: Invited discussion-Microsurgical ear replantation without venous repair: failure of development of venous channels despite patency of arterial anastomosis for 14 days. Ann Plast Surg 46: 442, 2001
  3. Kind GM: Microvascular ear replantation. Clin Plast Surg 29: 233, 2002 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0094-1298(01)00009-8
  4. Steffen A, Katzbach R, Klaiber S: A comparison of ear reattachment methods: a review of 25 years since Pennington. Plast Reconstr Surg 118: 1358, 2006 https://doi.org/10.1097/01.prs.0000239539.98956.b0
  5. mLadick RA, Carraway JH: Ear reattachment by the modified pocket principle. Case report. Plast Reconstr Surg 51: 584, 1973 https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-197305000-00025