Effects of the Characteristics of Influent Wastewater on Removal Efficiencies for Organic Matters in Wastewater Treatment Plants

하·폐수 처리시설 내 유입수 특성이 유기물 처리효율에 미치는 영향

  • Lee, Tae-Hwan (Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Sejong University) ;
  • Park, Min-Hye (Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Sejong University) ;
  • Lee, Bomi (Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Sejong University) ;
  • Hur, Jin (Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Sejong University) ;
  • Yang, Heejeoug (Han-River Environment Research Center)
  • 이태환 (세종대학교 지구환경과학과) ;
  • 박민혜 (세종대학교 지구환경과학과) ;
  • 이보미 (세종대학교 지구환경과학과) ;
  • 허진 (세종대학교 지구환경과학과) ;
  • 양희정 (국립환경과학원 한강물환경연구소)
  • Received : 2009.03.13
  • Accepted : 2009.08.12
  • Published : 2009.09.30

Abstract

Characteristics of organic matters (OM) in wastewater and the removal efficiencies were investigated using the influent and the effluent samples collected from 21 wastewater treatment plants. The OM characteristics investigated included biodegradability, humic content, specific UV absorbance (SUVA), the distribution percentage of refractory OM (R-OM), and synchronous fluorescence spectra. The types of wastewater (sewage, livestock waste/night soils, industrial waste) were easily distinguished by comparing the synchronous fluorescence spectra of the influent wastewater. The prominent peak of protein-like fluorescence (PLF) was observed for livestock waste/night soils whereas sewage exhibited a unique fluorescence peak at a wavelength of 370 nm. Irrespective of the wastewater types, the distribution percentage of R-OM increased from the influent to the effluent. Livestock waste/night soils showed the highest removal efficiency among all the three types of wastewater. There was no statistical difference of the removal efficiency between a traditional activated sludge and biological advanced treatment processes. Removal efficiency based on dissolved organic carbon DOC presented good correlations with the distribution percentage of R-OM and fulvic-like fluorescence (FLF) of the influent. The prediction for DOC removal efficiency was improved by using multiple regression analyses based on some selected OM characteristics and mixed liquid suspended solid (MLSS).

Keywords

Acknowledgement

Grant : 한강수계 난분해성 물질 증감요인 규명 및 관리방안 연구

References

  1. 이찬형, 문경숙(2005). 고도처리 하수처리장 운전조건의 통계분석. 한국환경과학회지, 14(2), pp. 251-258 https://doi.org/10.5322/JES.2005.14.2.251
  2. 추태호, 조용현, 이용두(2006). SRT공법에서 MLSS 농도에 따른 처리특성에 관한 연구. 한국수처리학회지, 14(3), pp. 51-58
  3. 허진, 신재기, 박성원(2006). 하천 및 호소 수질관리를 위한 자연유기물질 형광특성 분석. 대한환경공학회지, 28(9), pp. 940-948
  4. APHA, AWWA, WEF (2005). Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 19th
  5. Baker, A. (2001). Fluorescence excitation-emission matrix characterization of some sewage-impacted rivers. Environmental Science and Technology, 35(5), pp. 948-953 https://doi.org/10.1021/es000177t
  6. Barker, D. J. and Stuckey, D. C. (1999). A Review of soluble microbial products(SMP) in wastewater treatment systems. Water Research, 33(14), pp. 3063-3082 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0043-1354(99)00022-6
  7. Chefetz, B., Iiani, T., Schulz, E., and Chorover, J. (2006). Wastewater dissolved organic matter: characteristics and sorptive capabilities. Water Science and Technology, 53(7), pp. 51-57 https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2006.207
  8. Chen, W., Westeerhoff, P., Leenheer, J. A., and Booksh, K. (2003). Fluorescence excitation−emission matrix regional integration to quantify spectra for dissolved organic matter. Environmental Science and Technology, 37(24), pp. 5701-5710 https://doi.org/10.1021/es034354c
  9. Chen, Z., Hu, C., Conmy, R. N., Muller-Karger, F., and Swarzenski, P. (2007). Colored dissolved organic matter in Tampa Bay, Florida. Marine Chemistry, 104(1-2), pp. 98-109 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marchem.2006.12.007
  10. Chin, Y. P., Aiken, G. R., and Danielsen, K. M. (1997). Building of pyrene to aquatic and commercpial humic substances: The role of molecular weight and aromaticity. Environmental Science and Technology, 31(6), pp. 1630-1635 https://doi.org/10.1021/es960404k
  11. Dignac, M. F, Ginestet, P., Rybacki, D., Bruchet, A., Urbain, V., and Scribe, P. (2000). Fate of wastewater organic pollution during activated sludge treatment: Nature of residual organic matter. Water Research, 34(17), pp. 4185-4194 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0043-1354(00)00195-0
  12. Hur, J., Hwang, S. J., and Shin, J. K. (2008). Using synchronous fluorescence technique as a water quality monitoring tool for an urban river. Water, Air and Soil Pollution, 191(1-4), pp. 231-243 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-008-9620-4
  13. Imai, A., Fukushima, T., Matsushige, K., Kim Y. H., and Choi, K. (2002). Characterization of dissolved organic matter in effluents from wastewater treatment plants. Water Research, 36(4), pp. 859-870 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0043-1354(01)00283-4
  14. Janhom, T., Wattanachira, S., and Pavasant, P. (2009). Characterization of brewery wastewater with spectrofluorometry analysis. Journal of Environmental Management, 90(2), pp. 1184-1190 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2008.05.008
  15. Jarusutthirak, C. and Amy, G. (2007). Understanding soluble microbial products(SMP) as a component of effluent organic matter (EfOM). Water Research, 41(12), pp. 2787-2793 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2007.03.005
  16. Munz, G., De Angelis, D., Gori, R., Mori, G., Casarci, M., and Lubello, C. (2009). The role of tannins in conventional and membrane treatment of tannery wastewater. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 164(2-3), pp. 733-739 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.08.070
  17. Musikavong, C. and Wattanachira, S. (2007). Reduction of dissolved organic matter in terms of DOC, UV-254, SUVA and THMFP in industrial estate wastewater treated by stabilization ponds. Environ Monit Assess, 134, pp. 489-497 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-007-9639-9
  18. Servais, P., Garnier, J., Demarteau, N., Brion, N., and Billen, G. (1999). Supply of organic matter and bacteria to aquatic ecosystems through waste water effluents. Water Research, 33(16), pp. 3521-3531 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0043-1354(99)00056-1
  19. Shon, H. K., Vigneswaran, S., and Snyder, S. A. (2006). Effluent organic matter(EfOM) in wastewater : Constituents, effects, and treatment. Critical Reviews In Environmental Science and Technology, 36(4), pp. 327-374 https://doi.org/10.1080/10643380600580011
  20. Volk, C. J., Volk, C. B., and Louis, A. K. (1997). Chemical composition of biodegradable dissolved organic matter in stream water. Limnol Oceanogr, 42(1), pp. 39-44 https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.1997.42.1.0039
  21. Westerhoff, P., Chen, W., and Esparza, M. (2001). Fluorescence analysis of a standard fulvic acid and tertiary treated wastewater. Journal of Environmental Quality, 30(6), pp. 2037-2046 https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2001.2037