Micro Feeding Site Preference of Wintering Cranes by Topography and Vegetation in Cheorwon Basin, Korea

철원지역에서 월동하는 두루미류의 지형과 식생에 의한 미소 취식지 선호성

  • Published : 2009.10.31

Abstract

The main purpose of this study is to investigate the relationship between the topography of land and vegetation and the preferred habitat of wintering cranes. Investigations were conducted twelve times in Cheorwon basin, South Korea, during two wintering seasons (12/2005 - 2/2006; 1/2007 - 2/2007). The density of rice grain in the middle of rice paddies was higher than that of the areas along the edge of rice paddies. However it was observed that red-naped cranes preferred to feed along the edges of rice paddies rather than to feed in the middle of the paddies. White-naped cranes, on the other hand, Preferred to feed in the middle of paddies. To be more specific, red-crowned cranes preferred feeding sites such as levees of the paddies or the areas where the level of the rice beds was comparatively more elevated. But the preference of the white-naped cranes turned out to be just the opposite. Another finding was that both red-naped cranes and white-naped cranes preferred concealed areas for their feeding site, and the frequency rate of their feeding in concealed areas has little to do with weather factors. This finding contradicts a widely accepted view that cranes prefer open spaces for their feeding site. Besides, red-crowned cranes, compared with white-naped cranes, preferred to feed in more concealed areas. The frequency rate of feeding in both concealed areas and non-concealed areas had little to do with the size of feeding flocks. There was no difference between a flock of fewer than five cranes and a flock of more than five cranes in terms of frequency rate of their feeding. In conclusion, the result of these investigations indicate that red-naped cranes comparatively prefer concealed areas for their feeding site, and white-naped cranes are less prone to them, and there is no direct connection between their preference of feeding site or frequency and the size of their flock. This is presumed to be the characteristics unique to their individual species.

두루미류 취식무리의 미소 취식지 선호에 대한 특성을 밝히기 위하여 철원지역에서 월동기인 2005년 12월에서 2006년 2월, 2007년 1월에서 2월까지 총 12회 실시하였다. 두루미와 재두루미가 먹이로 하는 쌀 낙곡의 밀도는 논의 중앙보다 가장자리에 많았다. 하지만, 두루미류는 논의 중앙보다는 논둑 인근 지역을 취식장소로 이용하는 경우가 많았다. 상대적으로 재두루미는 두루미에 비하여 논의 중앙 지역을 취식장소로 이용하는 비율이 높았다. 두루미의 경우 논둑이 높고 논둑 식생의 높이가 높은 경우와 논둑 높이와 식생의 높이를 합한 높이가 높은 경우를 취식위치로 선호하였다. 재두루미는 논둑, 식생, 논둑과 식생의 높이 합이 키에 비하여 높은 경우를 선호하지 않았다. 또한, 두루미와 재두루미에서 모두 은폐지역에서 취식하는 비율이 날씨요인과 관계가 없었다. 이러한 결과는 두루미류가 개방된 취식지(수평가시권이 넓은 지역)를 선호한다는 기존 가설과는 달리 은폐된 취식지를 선호하는 것으로 나타났다. 또한 종간의 비교에서는 두루미가 재두루미에 비하여 은폐된 지역을 선호하는 것으로 나타났다. 무리크기별 은폐지역과 비은폐지역 취식비율은 두루미와 재두루미 모두 무리크기를 고려하지 않은 취식비율과 차이가 없었다. 결과적으로 두루미가 은폐지역을 선호하고 재두루미가 은폐지역에 상관없이 취식지를 선택하는 경향은 취식무리의 크기에 좌우되지 않는 종 특이적인 성향을 보였다.

Keywords

References

  1. Austin, lE. and A.L. Richert(2001) A Comprehensive reviewof observational and site evaluation data of migrantWhooping Cranes in the United States, 1943-1999. U.S.Geological Survey, Northern Prairie Wildlife ResearchCenter. Jamestown, ND. 157pp. http://www.npwrc.usgs.govIresource/2003/wcdatalwcdata.htm
  2. Aviles, .r.M.(2003) Time budget and habitat use of the CommonCrane wintering in dehesas of southwestern Spain. CanadianJournal of Zoology 81: 1233-1238 https://doi.org/10.1139/z03-105
  3. Bechard, M.l( 1982) Effect of vegetation cover on foraging siteselection by Swainson's Hawk. Condor 84: 153-159 https://doi.org/10.2307/1367658
  4. Bensch, S. and D. Hasselquist(l991) Territory infidelity in thepolygynous Great Reed Warbler (Acrocephalus arundinaceus):the effect of variation in territory attractiveness. Journal ofAnimal Ecology 60: 857-871 https://doi.org/10.2307/5418
  5. Cheorwon County(2002) Conservation plan of the migratorybirds and the establishment strategy of sustainable development.Cheorwon County Office. 398pp
  6. Choi. Y.S., I.K. Kwon, J.C. Yoo(2004) Habitat use of waterbirdsin rice field. Korean Journal of Nature Conservation2(3-4): 43-59 https://doi.org/10.30960/kjnc.2004.2.3_4.43
  7. Frid, A. and L. Dill(2002) Human-caused disturbance stimuli asa fOlm of predation risk. Conservation Ecology 6( I): 11.(online) URL:www.ecologyandsociety.org/voI6/issllartlll
  8. Gill, J.A. and W.J. Sutherland(2004) Predicting the consequencesof human disturbance from behavioural decisions. pp. 51-64.In: Gosling, L. M. and W. 1 Sutherland (eds.), Behaviourand Conservation (digital edition). Cambridge UniversityPress, UK. 438pp
  9. Gillman, J.A. and D.F. Fraser(l987) Habitat selection under predationhazard: test of a model with foraging minnow.Ecology 68: 1856-1862 https://doi.org/10.2307/1939877
  10. Hardin, G.(1960) The competitive exclusion principle. Science131: 1292-1297 https://doi.org/10.1126/science.131.3409.1292
  11. Holway, D.A.(l991) Nest-site selection and importance of nestconcealment in the Black-throated Blue Warbler. Condor93: 575-581 https://doi.org/10.2307/1368189
  12. Hyundai City Corporation(2007) Survey study of the bird distributionand habitat at the Planning area of Tae-an CorporationCity Program of Tourism and Leisure. Survey study of the bird distributionand habitat at the Planning area of Tae-an CorporationCity Program of Tourism and Leisure. 112 pp
  13. lohnsgard, P.A.(1993) Cranes of the World. Indiana Univ.Press. Bloomington. 258pp
  14. Klein, M.L., S.R. Humphrey and H.F. Percival(1995) Effect ofecotourism on distribution of waterbirds in a wildliferefuge. Conservation Biology 9(6): 1454-1465 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1739.1995.09061454.x
  15. Koo, T.H.(1980) Crane Ecology. Nature Conservation 32:32-33
  16. Krebs, l.R. and N.B. Davies(l993). An Introduction to behaviouralecology (3rd edt.). Oxford, Blackwell Scientific Publications.420pp
  17. KWRC(2005) Ecological network planning in Sihwa district.Korea Institute of Water and Environment, Korea WaterResources Corporation. 264pp
  18. Lee, S.D., P.G. Jablonski and H. Higuchi(2007) Effect of hetero-specifics on foraging endangered species red-crownedcrane and white-naped cranes in the Korean DmelitarizedZone. Ecological Research 22(4): 635-640 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11284-006-0067-z
  19. Lee, W.S., SJ. Rhim and C.R. Park(2001) Habitat use of cranesin Cheolwon Basin, Korea. Korean Journal of Ecology24(2): 77-80
  20. Lima, S.L. and L.M. Dill(1990) Behavioral decisions made underthe risk of predation: a review and prospectus. CanadianJournal of Zoology 68: 619-640 https://doi.org/10.1139/z90-092
  21. Lima, S.L.(l998) Stress and decision making under the risk ofpredation: recent developments from behavioral, reproductiveand ecological perspectives. Advances in theStudy of Behavior 27: 215-290 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-3454(08)60366-6
  22. Lovvorn, J.R. and C.M. Kirkpatrick(1982) Recruitment and socially-specific flocking tendencies of Eastern SandhillCranes. Wilson Bulletin 94(3): 313-32l
  23. Madsen, J.(1995) Impacts of disturbance on migratory waterfowl.Ibis 137: 67-74 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1474-919X.1995.tb08459.x
  24. Masatomi, H., K. Momose, T. Matsuo, K. Koga and N.Aoki(l994) Breeding status of the Red-crowned Crane Grusjaponensis in eastern Hokkaido, Japan in 1994. Strix 13:103-142
  25. Meine, C.D. and G.W. Archibald(1996) The Cranes: status surveyand conservation action plan. IUCN, Gland, Switzerlandand Cambridge, U.K. 294pp
  26. Mukherjee, A.(1999) Ecological study on the Sarus Crane Grusantigone in the Central Gujarat. Ph. D. Thesis Univ. ofSaurashtra. 176pp
  27. Newton, I.(1998) Population Limitation in Birds. AcademicPress, London, UK. 597pp
  28. Pae, S.H.(1994) Wintering ecology of Red-crowned Crane Grusjaponensis and White-naped Crane Grus vipio in Cholwonbasin, Korea. M. Sc. Thesis, Kyung Hee University. 43pp
  29. Pae, S. H.(2000) A study on habitat use of wintering cranes inDMZ, Korea: with carrying capacity and spatial distributionanalysis using GIS Ph. D. Thesis, Kyung Hee University.77pp
  30. Rohbaugh, R.W. and R.H. Yahner(1997) Effect of macrohabitatand microhabitat on nest-box use and nesting success ofAmerican Kestrels. Willson Bulletin 109(3): 410-423
  31. Shenk, T.M. and MJ. Armbruster(1986) Whooping crane habitatcriteria for the Big Bend area of the Platte River.Unpublished repOli to Biological Ad Hoc Workshop, PlatteRiver Management Joint Study. U.S. Fish and WildlifeService, National Ecological Research Center, Fort Collins,Colorado. 34pp
  32. Yates, M.G., J.D. Goss-Custard, S. McGrosty, K. Lakhani, Lev. Dit, S. E. A. Durell, R. T. Clatke, W. E. Rispin, 1. Moy,T. Yates, R. A. Plant and A. J. Frost(1993) Sediment characteristics,invertebrate densities and shorebird densities onthe inner banks of the Wash. Journal of Applied Ecology30: 599-614 https://doi.org/10.2307/2404240
  33. Yoo, S.H.(2004) Some factors affecting the distribution of Grusjaponensis and Grus vipio behavioral aspects of familygroup. M. Sc. Thesis, Kyung Hee University. 113pp
  34. Yoo, S.H., K.S. Lee, J.C. Yoo(2007) Reaction to the vehicleand trade-off between vehicle disturbance and food resourcesof Cranes: focused in the wintering Cranes inCheorwon basin, Korea. Korean Journal of Environmentand Ecology 21(6): 526-535
  35. Yoo, S.H. J.B. Kim and 1.K. Kim(2008a) Distribution aspectand seasonal distribution change of the wintering geese inCheonsu bay. Korean Journal of Environment and Ecology22(6): 632-639
  36. Yoo, S.H., I.K. Kim, T.H. Kang, H.J. Cho, J.P. Yu, S.W. Leeand H.S. Lee(2008b) Wintering bird community in Cheonsubay and relationship with food resources. Korean Journal ofEnvironment and Ecology 22(3): 301-308
  37. Yoo, S.H., K.S. Lee, 1.K. Kim and T.H. Kang and H.S.Lee(2009) Research on size, formation and tendency toevade the road of the feeding flocks of crane species: centeringeffect on the effect of road vs traffic condition.Korean Journal of Environment and Ecology 23(1): 41-49
  38. Zwarts, L. and R.H. Drent(1981) Prey depletion and regulationof predator density: Oystercatchers (Haematopus ostalegus)feeding on mussels (Mytilus edulis). pp. 193-216, In: Jones,N. V. and W. J. Wolf(eds.) Feeding and survival strategiesof estuarine organisms, London, Plenum