DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Pressure Adjustment Protocol for Programmable Valves

  • Kim, Kyoung-Hun (Department of Neurosurgery, Daejeon St Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea) ;
  • Yeo, In-Seoung (Department of Neurosurgery, Daejeon St Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea) ;
  • Yi, Jin-Seok (Department of Neurosurgery, Daejeon St Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea) ;
  • Lee, Hyung-Jin (Department of Neurosurgery, Daejeon St Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea) ;
  • Yang, Ji-Ho (Department of Neurosurgery, Daejeon St Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea) ;
  • Lee, Il-Woo (Department of Neurosurgery, Daejeon St Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea)
  • Published : 2009.10.28

Abstract

Objective : There is no definite adjustment protocol for patients shunted with programmable valves. Therefore, we attempted to find an appropriate method to adjust the valve, initial valve-opening pressure, adjustment scale, adjustment time interval, and final valve-opening pressure of a programmable valve. Methods : Seventy patients with hydrocephalus of various etiologies were shunted with programmable shunting devices (Micro Valve with $RICKHAM^{(R)}$ Reservoir). The most common initial diseases were subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) and head trauma. Sixty-six patients had a communicating type of hydrocephalus, and 4 had an obstructive type of hydrocephalus. Fifty-one patients had normal pressure-type hydrocephalus and 19 patients had high pressure-type hydrocephalus. We set the initial valve pressure to $10-30\;mmH_2O$, which is lower than the preoperative lumbar tapping pressure or the intraoperative ventricular tapping pressure, conducted brain computerized tomographic (CT) scans every 2 to 3 weeks, correlated results with clinical symptoms, and reset valve-opening pressures. Results : Initial valve-opening pressures varied from 30 to $180\;mmH_2O$ (mean, $102{\pm}27.5\;mmH_2O$). In high pressure-type hydrocephalus patients, we have set the initial valve-opening pressure from 100 to $180\;mmH_2O$. We decreased the valve-opening pressure $20-30\;mmH_2O$ at every 2- or 3-week interval, until hydrocephalus-related symptoms improved and the size of the ventricle was normalized. There were 154 adjustments in 81 operations (mean, 1.9 times). In 19 high pressure-type patients, final valve-opening pressures were $30-160\;mmH_2O$, and 16 (84%) patients' symptoms had nearly improved completely. However, in 51 normal pressure-type patients, only 31 (61%) had improved. Surprisingly, in 22 of the 31 normal pressure-type improved patients, final valve-opening pressures were $30\;mmH_2O$ (16 patients) and $40\;mmH_2O$ (6 patients). Furthermore, when final valve-opening pressures were adjusted to $30\;mmH_2O$, 14 patients symptom was improved just at the point. There were 18 (22%) major complications : 7 subdural hygroma, 6 shunt obstructions, and 5 shunt infections. Conclusion : In normal pressure-type hydrocephalus, most patients improved when the final valve-opening pressure was $30\;mmH_2O$. We suggest that all normal pressure-type hydrocephalus patients be shunted with programmable valves, and their initial valve-opening pressures set to $10-30\;mmH_2O$ below their preoperative cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) pressures. If final valve-opening pressures are lowered in 20 or $30\;mmH_2O$ scale at 2- or 3-week intervals, reaching a final pressure of $30\;mmH_2O$, we believe that there is a low risk of overdrainage syndromes.

Keywords

References

  1. Ahn KJ, Koh HS, Kim SH, Youm JY, Song SH, Kim Y : Clinical analysis of programmable valve versus differential pressure valve in hydrocephalus. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 34 : 230-233, 2003
  2. Ahn ST, Yoo DS, Cho KS, Kim JK, Huh PW, Kim DS, et al. : The use of the programmable valve shunt system in the management of patients with hydrocephalus. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 31 : 139-144, 2002
  3. Aschoff A, Kr!mer P, Benesch C, Klank A, Kunze S : Shunt-technology and overdrainage. A critical review of hydrostatic programmable and variable-resistance valves and flow reducing devices. Eur J Pediatr Surg (Suppl) 1 : 49-50, 1991
  4. Black PM : Idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus. Results of shunting in 62 patients. J Neurosurg 52 : 371-377, 1980 https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.1980.52.3.0371
  5. Black PM, Hakim R, Olsen BN : The use of the Codman-Medos programmable Hakim valve in the management of patients with hydrocephalus : illustrative cases. Neurosurgery 34 : 1110-1113, 1994 https://doi.org/10.1227/00006123-199406000-00040
  6. Boon AJ, Tans JT, Delwel EJ, Egeler-Peerdeman SM, Hanlo PW, Wurzer HA, et al. : Dutch normal-pressure hydrocephalus study : randomized comparison of low- and medium-pressure shunts. J Neurosurg 88 : 490-495, 1998 https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.1998.88.3.0490
  7. Han YM, Yoo DS, Kim DS, Huh PW, Cho KS, Kang JK : A clinical analysis of the ventriculoperitoneal shunt with programmable shunt device. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 28 : 75-81, 1999
  8. Hakim S : Hydraulic and mechanical mis-matching of valve shunts used in the treatment of hydrocephalus : The need for a servo-valve shunt. Dev Med Child Neurol 15 : 646-653, 1973 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8749.1973.tb05175.x
  9. Kamano S, Nakano Y, Imanishi T, Hattori Ml : Management with a programmable pressure valve of subdural hematomas caused by a ventriculoperitoneal shunt : case report. Surg Neurol 35 : 381-383, 1991 https://doi.org/10.1016/0090-3019(91)90050-J
  10. Kim KJ, Kang JS, Suh BS, Lee HS, Lee JS : Clinical experience with the programmable valve for hydrocephalus patients. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 33 : 170-174, 2003
  11. Larsson A, Wikkelso C, Bilting M, Stephensen H : Clinical parameters in 74 consecutive patients shunt operated for normal pressure hydrocephalus. Acta Neurol Scand 84 : 475-482, 1991 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0404.1991.tb04998.x
  12. Marmarou A, Young HF, Aygok GA, Sawauchi S, Tsuji O, Yamamoto T, et al. : Diagnosis and management of idiopathic normalpressure hydrocephalus : a prospective study of 151 patients. J Neurosurg 102 : 987-997, 2005 https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.2005.102.6.0987
  13. Mori K : Management of idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus : a multiinstitutional study conducted in Japan. J Neurosurg 95 : 970-973, 2001 https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.2001.95.6.0970
  14. Nulsen FE, Becker DP : Treatment of hydrocephalus by direct shunt from ventricle to jugular vein. Surg Forum 2 : 399-403, 1951
  15. O'Reilly G, Williams B : The Sophy valve and the el-Shafei shunt system for adult hydrocephalus. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 59 : 621-624, 1995 https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp.59.6.621
  16. Pang D, Altschuler E : Low-pressure hydrocephalic state and viscoelastic alterations in the brain. Neurosurgery 35 : 643-656, 1994 https://doi.org/10.1227/00006123-199410000-00010
  17. Rohde V, Mayfrank L, Ramakers VT, Gilsbach JM : Four-year experience with the routine use of the programmable Hakim valve in the management of children with hydrocephalus. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 140 : 1127-1134, 1998 https://doi.org/10.1007/s007010050226
  18. Sutcliffe JC, Battersby RD : Do we need variable pressure shunts? Br J Neurosurg 6 : 67-70, 1992 https://doi.org/10.3109/02688699209002904
  19. Vanneste J, Augustijn P, Dirven C, Tan WF, Goedhart ZD : Shunting normal-pressure hydrocephalus : do the benefits outweigh the risks? A multicenter study and literature review. Neurology 42 : 54-59, 1992 https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.42.1.54
  20. Zemack G, Romner B : Seven years clinical experience with the Codman Hakim programmable valve : a retrospective study of 583 patients. J Neurosurg 92 : 941-948, 2000 https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.2000.92.6.0941

Cited by

  1. Programmable valve represents an efficient and safe tool in the treatment of idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus patients vol.71, pp.4, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1590/0004-282x20130007
  2. Use of programmable versus nonprogrammable shunts in the management of hydrocephalus secondary to aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: a retrospective study with cost-benefit analysis : Clinical articl vol.121, pp.4, 2014, https://doi.org/10.3171/2014.3.jns131088
  3. An investigation into the clinical impacts of lowering shunt opening pressure in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus: A case series vol.29, pp.1, 2015, https://doi.org/10.3109/02688697.2014.950630
  4. Use of programmable versus nonprogrammable shunts in the management of normal pressure hydrocephalus : A multicenter retrospective study with cost–benefit analysis in Turkey vol.96, pp.39, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1097/md.0000000000008185
  5. Cerebrospinal Fluid Lumbar Tapping Utilization for Suspected Ventriculoperitoneal Shunt Under-Drainage Malfunctions vol.60, pp.1, 2009, https://doi.org/10.3340/jkns.2016.0404.002
  6. Flow-regulated versus differential pressure valves for idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus: comparison of overdrainage rates and neurological outcome vol.162, pp.1, 2009, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-019-04088-9