DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Clinical and Radiological Outcomes of Anterior Cervical Interbody Fusion Using Hydroxyapatite Spacer

  • Kim, Sung-Chul (Department of Neurosurgery, Ajou University School of Medicine) ;
  • Kang, Sung-Won (Department of Neurosurgery, Ajou University School of Medicine) ;
  • Kim, Se-Hyuk (Department of Neurosurgery, Ajou University School of Medicine) ;
  • Cho, Ki-Hong (Department of Neurosurgery, Ajou University School of Medicine) ;
  • Kim, Sang-Hyun (Department of Neurosurgery, Ajou University School of Medicine)
  • Published : 2009.10.28

Abstract

Objective : This is retrospective study of clinical and radiological outcomes of anterior cervical fusion using Bongros-$HA^{TM}$ (BioAlpha, Seongnam, Korea) which is a type of synthetic hydroxyapatite (HA) spacer to evaluate the efficacy in its clinical application and usefulness as a reliable alternative to autograft bone. Methods : Twenty-nine patients were enrolled in this study and 40 segments were involved. All patients were performed anterior cervical interbody fusion using HA spacer and plating system. Indications for surgery were radiculopathy caused by soft-disc herniation or spondylosis in 18 patients, spondylotic myelopathy in 1 patient, and spinal trauma in 10 patients. Cervical spine radiographs were obtained on postoperative 1day, 1week, and then at 1, 2, 6, and 12 months in all patients to evaluate intervertebral disc height, and the degrees of lordosis. Cervical computed tomography was done at postoperative 12 month in all patients to confirm the fusion status. The mean period of clinical follow-up was 17 months. Results : Complete interbody fusion was achieved in 100% of patients. Preoperative kyphotic deformities were corrected in all cases after surgery. Intervertebral disc height was well maintained during follow up period. There were no cases of graft extrusion, graft deterioration and graft fracture. Conclusion : HA spacer is very efficient in achieving cervical fusion, maintaining intervertebral disc height, and restoring lordosis. When combined with the placement of a cervical plate, immediate stability can be achieved and graft related complication can be prevented.

Keywords

References

  1. Abraham DJ, Herkowitz HN : Indications and trends in use in cervical spinal fusions. Orthop Clin North Am 29 : 731-744, 1998 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0030-5898(05)70044-4
  2. Alvarez JA, Hardy RW Jr : Anterior cervical discectomy for one- and two-level cervical disc disease : the controversy surrounding the question of whether to fuse, plate, or both. Crit Rev Neurosurg 9 : 234-251, 1999 https://doi.org/10.1007/s003290050138
  3. Aronson N, Filtzer DL, Bagan M : Anterior cervical fusion by the smith-robinson approach. J Neurosurg 29 : 396-404, 1968
  4. Bartels RH, Donk R, van Azn RD : Height of cervical foramina after anterior discectomy and implantation of a carbon fiber cage. J Neurosurg 95 : 40-42, 2001
  5. Bishop RC, Moore KA, Hadley MN : Anterior cervical interbody fusion using autogeneic and allogeneic bone graft substrate : a prospective comparative analysis. J Neurosurg 85 : 206-210, 1996 https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.1996.85.2.0206
  6. Bohlman HH, Emery SE, Goodfellow DB, Jones PK : Robinson anterior cervical discectomy and arthrodesis for cervical radiculopathy. Long-term follow-up of one hundred and twenty-two patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am 75 : 1298-1307, 1993
  7. B$\ddot{o}$ker DK, Schultheiss R, van Roost D, Osborn JF, Kaden B : Anterior cervical discectomy and vertebral interbody fusion with hydroxyapatite ceramic. Preliminary results. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 121 : 191-195, 1993 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01809274
  8. Chen BH, Natarajan RN, An HS, Andersson GB : Comparison of biomechanical response to surgical procedures used for cervical radiculopathy : posterior keyhole foraminotomy versus anterior foraminotomy and discectomy versus anterior discectomy with fusion. J Spinal Disord 14 : 17-20, 2001 https://doi.org/10.1097/00002517-200102000-00004
  9. Cloward RB : The anterior approach for removal of ruptured cervical disks. J Neurosurg 15 : 602-617, 1958 https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.1958.15.6.0602
  10. Connolly PJ, Esses SI, Kostuik JP : Anterior cervical fusion : outcome analysis of patients fused with and without anterior cervical plates. J Spinal Disord 9 : 202-206, 1996
  11. Denissen HW, de Groot K : Immediate dental root implants from synthetic dense calcium hydroxylapatite. J Prosthet Dent 42 : 551-556, 1979 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(79)90253-1
  12. el Deeb M, Waite DE, Mainous EG : Correction of the deficient alveolar ridge. Clin Plast Surg 16 : 733-748, 1989
  13. Geer CP, Papadopoulos SM : The argument for single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with anterior plate fixation. Clin Neurosurg 45 : 25-29; discussion 21, 1999
  14. Grote JJ : Reconstruction of the ossicular chain with hydroxyapatite prostheses. Am J Otol 8 : 396-401, 1987
  15. Kim P, Wakai S, Matsuo S, Moriyama T, Kirino T : Bisegmental cervical interbody fusion using hydroxyapatite implants : surgical results and long-term observation in 70 cases. J Neurosurg 88 : 21-27, 1998 https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.1998.88.1.0021
  16. Lee CJ, Rhee DY, Heo W, Yoon JW, Park HS : The advantages of rectangular titanium cage (RABEA) fusion after anterior cervical discectomy : comparative study of fibula allograft. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 36 : 448-453, 2004
  17. Madawi AA, Powell M, Crockard HA : Biocompatible osteoconductive osteoconductive polymer versus iliac graft. A prospective comparative study for the evaluation of fusion pattern after anterior cervical discectomy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 21 : 2123-2129; discussion 2129-2130, 1996 https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199609150-00013
  18. Nakajima T, Tominaga Y, Yamaguchi K : Design and clinical results of hydroxyapatite vertebral spacer in cervical anterior surgery. Proceedings of the 19th Annual Orthopedic Ceramic Implant Meeting November 27, 1999
  19. Pintar FA, Maiman DJ, Hollowell JP, Yoganandan N, Droese KW, Reinartz JM, et al. : Fusion rate and biomechanical stiffness of hydroxylapatite versus autogenous bone grafts for anterior discectomy. An in vivo animal study. Spine 19 (Phila Pa 1976) : 2524-2528, 1994
  20. Schneider JR, Bright RW : Anterior cervical fusion using preserved bone allografts. Transplant Proc 8 : 73-76, 1976
  21. Senter HJ, Kortyna R, Kemp WR : Anterior cervical discectomy with hydroxylapatite fusion. Neurosurgery 25 : 39-42; discussion 42-33, 1989 https://doi.org/10.1227/00006123-198907000-00007
  22. Shapiro S : Banked fibula and the locking anterior cervical plate in anterior cervical fusions following cervical discectomy. J Neurosurg 84 : 161-165, 1996 https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.1996.84.2.0161
  23. Shapiro S, Connolly P, Donnaldson J, Abel T : Cadaveric fibula, locking plate, and allogeneic bone matrix for anterior cervical fusions after cervical discectomy for radiculopathy or myelopathy. J Neurosurg 95 : 43-50, 2001
  24. Smith GW, Robinson RA : The treatment of certain cervical-spine disorders by anterior removal of the intervertebral disc and interbody fusion. J Bone Joint Surg Am 40 A : 607-624, 1958
  25. Thalgott JS, Fritts K, Giuffre JM, Timlin M : Anterior interbody fusion of the cervical spine with coralline hydroxyapatite. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 24 : 1295-1299, 1999 https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199907010-00005
  26. Toth JM, An HS, Lim TH, Ran Y, Weiss NG, Lundberg WR, et al. : Evaluation of porous biphasic calcium phosphate ceramics for anterior cervical interbody fusion in a caprine model. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 20 : 2203-2210, 1995 https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199510001-00005
  27. Tracy BM, Doremus RH : Direct electron microscopy studies of the bone-hydroxylapatite interface. J Biomed Mater Res 18 : 719-726, 1984 https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.820180702
  28. Uchida A, Araki N, Shinto Y, Yoshikawa H, Kurisaki E, Ono K : The use of calcium hydroxyapatite ceramic in bone tumour surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Br 72 : 298-302, 1990
  29. Zdeblick TA, Cooke ME, Kunz DN, Wilson D, McCabe RP : Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion using a porous hydroxyapatite bone graft substitute. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 19 : 2348-2357, 1994 https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199410150-00017
  30. Zdeblick TA, Ghanayem AJ, Rapoff AJ, Swain C, Bassett T, Cooke ME, et al. : Cervical interbody fusion cages. An animal model with and without bone morphogenetic protein. Spine 23 : 758-765; discussion 766, 1998 https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199804010-00002

Cited by

  1. Avaliação retrospectiva de artrodese cervical com enxerto autólogo versus hidroxiapatita vol.9, pp.4, 2009, https://doi.org/10.1590/s1808-18512010000400017
  2. Endogenous-Lesioned Cervical Disc Herniation: A Retrospective Review of 9 Cases vol.96, pp.4, 2009, https://doi.org/10.9738/1374.1
  3. Finite Element Modeling of Stress Distribution in Intervertebral Spacers of Different Surface Geometries vol.37, pp.11, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1111/aor.12107
  4. Surgical Outcomes of Anterior Cervical Fusion Using Deminaralized Bone Matrix as Stand-Alone Graft Material: Single Arm, Pilot Study vol.13, pp.3, 2009, https://doi.org/10.14245/kjs.2016.13.3.114
  5. Nanocrystalline hydroxyapatite intervertebral cages induce fusion after anterior cervical discectomy and may be a safe alternative to PEEK or carbon fiber intervertebral cages vol.30, pp.6, 2016, https://doi.org/10.3109/02688697.2016.1173192
  6. Airway Management Protocol After Anterior Cervical Spine Surgery: Analysis of the Results of Risk Factors Associated With Airway Complication vol.42, pp.18, 2009, https://doi.org/10.1097/brs.0000000000002236
  7. Clinical Application of Ceramics in Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: A Review and Update vol.7, pp.4, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1177/2192568217699201
  8. Incidence and clinical relevance of cage subsidence in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a systematic review vol.160, pp.4, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-018-3490-3
  9. Evaluation of bony fusion after anterior cervical discectomy: a systematic literature review vol.28, pp.2, 2009, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-018-5820-9
  10. Bioactive Glass-Ceramic (NOVOMAX®) Spacer for Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: A Minimum 2-Year Follow-Up Study vol.6, pp.2, 2009, https://doi.org/10.21129/nerve.2020.6.2.57