DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

HUMAN ERRORS DURING THE SIMULATIONS OF AN SGTR SCENARIO: APPLICATION OF THE HERA SYSTEM

  • Jung, Won-Dea (Integrated Safety Assessment Department, Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute) ;
  • Whaley, April M. (Nuclear Safety and Regulatory Research, Idaho National Laboratories) ;
  • Hallbert, Bruce P. (Nuclear Safety and Regulatory Research, Idaho National Laboratories)
  • Published : 2009.12.31

Abstract

Due to the need of data for a Human Reliability Analysis (HRA), a number of data collection efforts have been undertaken in several different organizations. As a part of this effort, a human error analysis that focused on a set of simulator records on a Steam Generator Tube Rupture (SGTR) scenario was performed by using the Human Event Repository and Analysis (HERA) system. This paper summarizes the process and results of the HERA analysis, including discussions about the usability of the HERA system for a human error analysis of simulator data. Five simulated records of an SGTR scenario were analyzed with the HERA analysis process in order to scrutinize the causes and mechanisms of the human related events. From this study, the authors confirmed that the HERA was a serviceable system that can analyze human performance qualitatively from simulator data. It was possible to identify the human related events in the simulator data that affected the system safety not only negatively but also positively. It was also possible to scrutinize the Performance Shaping Factors (PSFs) and the relevant contributory factors with regard to each identified human event.

Keywords

References

  1. A. Kolaczkowski, J. Forester, E. Lois, and S. Cooper, "Good practices for implementing human reliability analysis (HRA)," NUREG-1792, USNRC (2005)
  2. OECD/NEA, “HRA data and recommended actions to support the collection and exchange of HRA data,” Draft report of WGRisk Task, 2002-1, 2008
  3. D. Gertman, W. Gilmore, W. Galtean, M. Gorh, C. Gentillon, and B. Gilbert, “Nuclear computerized library for assessing reactor reliability (NUCLARR),” NUREG/CR-4639, Vol.1, USNRC (1988)
  4. S. Adams and B. Kirwan, “Human reliability data requirements,” Int. J. Quality Reliability Management, 12(1), p24–46 (1995) https://doi.org/10.1108/02656719510076221
  5. A. Swain and H. Guttmann, “Handbook of human reliability analysis with emphasis on nuclear power plant applications,” NUREG/CR-1278, USNRC (1983)
  6. M. Kaarstad, B. Kirwan, K. Folels$\phi$, E. Endestad, and B.Torralba, “Human error – the first pilot study,” HWR-417, OECD Halden Reactor Project (1994)
  7. K. Laumann, P. Braarud, and H. Svengren, “The Task Complexity Experiment 2003/2004,” HWR-758, OECD Halden Reactor Project (2005)
  8. J. Park and W. Jung, “OPERA–a human performance database under simulated emergencies of nuclear power plants,” Reliability Engineering System Safety, 92, p503~519 (2007) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2006.01.007
  9. W. Jung, J. Park, J. Kim, and J. Ha, “Analysis of an operators’ performance time and its application to a human reliability analysis in nuclear power plants,” IEEE Trans on Nuclear Science, 54(5), p1801~1811 (2007) https://doi.org/10.1109/TNS.2007.905163
  10. B. Hallbert, R. Boring, D. Gertman, D. Dudenhoeffer, A. Whaley, J. Marble, J. Joe, and E. Lois, “Human event repository and analysis (HERA) system, overview,” NUREG/CR-6903, Vol. 1, USNRC (2006)
  11. B. Hallbert, A. Whaley, R. Boring, P. McCabe, and Y. Chang, "Human event repository and analysis (HERA) system: the HERA coding manual and quality assurance," NUREG/CR-6903, Vol. 2, USNRC (2007)
  12. B. Jeong, et. al., “Development of Korean HPES (Human Performance Enhancement System) for nuclear power plants,” TR.95ZJ04.J1998.21, KEPRI (1998)
  13. M. Paradise, L. Unger, P. Haas, and M. Terranova, “Development of the NRC's Human Performance Investigation Process (HPIP),” NUREG/CR-5455, Vol. 1 (1992)
  14. E. Lois, V. Dang, J. Forester, H. Broberg, S. Massaiu, M. Hildebrandt, P. Braarud, G. Parry, J. Julius, R. Boring, I. M$\ddot{a}$nnist$\ddot{o}$, and A. Bye, “International HRA empirical study – pilot phase report,” HWR-844, OECD Halden Reactor Project (2008)
  15. Korea Hydro-Nuclear Power, “Emergency operating procedures of a reference plant,” KHNP (2005)
  16. I. M$\ddot{a}$nnist$\ddot{o}$ and R. Boring, “Application of HERA in empirical HRA study,” HWR-893, OECD Halden Reactor Project (2008)
  17. B. Boring, A. Whaley, B. Hallbert, K. Laumann, P. Braarud, A. Bye, E. Lois, and Y. Chang, “Capturing control room simulator data with the HERA system,” Proc. of the joint 8th IEEE conference on Human Factors and Power Plants and 13th annual workshop on Human Performance/Root Cause/Trending/Operating Experience/Self Assessment, Monterey, USA, p210-217, Aug. 2007 https://doi.org/10.1109/HFPP.2007.4413208
  18. Committee on the Safety of Nuclear Installations (CSNI), “Extended task force on human factors, Task 5: role of simulators in operator training,” Report No. NEA/CSNI/R(97)13, OECD/NEA, Paris, France (1998)
  19. J. O’Hara and R. Hall, “Advanced control rooms and crew performance issues: Implications for human reliability,” IEEE Trans Nuclear Science, 39(4), p919–23 (1992) https://doi.org/10.1109/23.159733
  20. N. Stanton, “Simulators: a review of research and practices,” In:Stanton N, editor. Human factors in nuclear safety, Taylor & Francis Ltd., p117–40, London (1996)