DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

혐기성 박테리아, 효모 및 곰팡이로 제조된 synbiotics 첨가 축우용 완전혼합사료의 성분 변화 및 발효 특성에 미치는 영향

Effects of Supplemental Synbiotics Composed of Anaerobic Bacteria, Yeast and Mold on the Change of Chemical Composition and Fermentation Characteristics of Total Mixed Ration for Cattle

  • 이신자 (경상대학교 응용생명과학부(BK 21)) ;
  • 신년학 (경상대학교 응용생명과학부(BK 21)) ;
  • 정호식 (경상대학교 응용생명과학부(BK 21)) ;
  • 문여황 (진주산업대학교 동물생명과학과) ;
  • 이상석 (순천대학교 동물자원과학과) ;
  • 이성실 (경상대학교 응용생명과학부(BK 21))
  • Lee, Shin-Ja (Division of Applied Life Science (BK 21 Program), Graduate School Gyeongsang National University) ;
  • Shin, Nyeon-Hak (Division of Applied Life Science (BK 21 Program), Graduate School Gyeongsang National University) ;
  • Jung, Ho-Sik (Division of Applied Life Science (BK 21 Program), Graduate School Gyeongsang National University) ;
  • Moon, Yea-Hwang (Department of Animal Science & Biotechnology, Jinju National University,) ;
  • Lee, Sang-Suk (Department of Animal Science & Biotechnology, Sunchon National University) ;
  • Lee, Sung-Sill (Division of Applied Life Science (BK 21 Program), Graduate School Gyeongsang National University)
  • 발행 : 2009.02.28

초록

본 시험은 혐기성 박테리아, 효모 및 곰팡이로 제조한 synbiotics를 TMR에 첨가하여 7일 동안 발효시킨 후, 성분함량의 변화 및 개봉하여 공기에 노출시킨 기간에 따른 발효특성의 변화를 알아보기 위하여 수행되었다. 처리구는 무처리구인 US구, 혐기성 박테리아와 prebiotics로 구성된 BS구, 혐기성 효모와 prebiotics로 구성된 YS, 혐기성 곰팡이와 prebiotics로 구성된 MS구, 혐기성 박테리아와 혐기성 곰팡이 및 prebiotics를 조합한 BMS구, 혐기성 효모와 혐기성 곰팡이 그리고 prebiotics를 조합한 YMS구, 혐기성 박테리아와 혐기성 효모 그리고 prebiotics를 조합한 BYS구, 혐기성 박테리아, 효모 및 곰팡이 복합물과 prebiotics를 조합한 BMYS구로서 총 8 처리구로 나누었다. 개봉 후 노출기간(1, 3, 5, 7, 14, 및 21일)별 3반복으로 총 144개의 bag을 공시사료로 제조하였다. 혐기 발효 TMR의 개봉 후 성분함량과 공기노출에 따른 발효특성에 대한 결과를 요약하면 다음과 같다. 혐기 발효시킨 TMR의 수분함량은 약 41${\sim}$45% 범위로서원 사료와 비슷한 수준이었다. 조단백질 함량은 기초 사료에 비해 무처리 대조구에서는 11.7${\sim}$14.8% 줄어들었으나, BMYS 처리구에서는 약 11%가 증가되었다. BMYS 처리구에서는 조섬유 함량이 기초사료에 비해 약 32% 감소되었고, NDF 및 ADF도 각각 15.5% 및 26.1%가 감소되었다. 공시사료의 내부 온도는 개봉 7일째에 전 처리구에서 높게 나타났다. 발효 TMR의 pH는 개봉 5일까지는 처리 간에 차이가 없었으나, 개봉 7일 이후부터는 높아졌고, BMS구에서 개봉 14일째에 가장 높았다(P<0.05). 산에 대한 완충능력은 개봉 후, 시간이 경과함에 따라 산의 첨가량이 많아져 완충능력이 높아지는 경향으로서 대체로 개봉 7일 이후부터 시작하여 14일째에 peak를 이루었다. 발효 TMR 즙액의 $NH_3-N$ 농도는 개봉 후 5일째에 peak를 이루었으며, 휘발성지방산 함량은 매우 낮은 수준이었다. 이상의 결과로 볼 때, BMYS 처리구에서 단백질 함량은 높아지고, 섬유소함량은 낮아졌지만, 공기 중 노출기간별 발효특성에서는 혐기성 synbiotics의 첨가에 따른 영향은 없는 것으로 나타났다.

In order to investigate the effects of synbiotics on change of chemical composition and fermentation characteristics of total mixed ration (TMR), eight TMRs fermented by synbiotics composing the anaerobic microbes (bacteria, yeast, mold) were alloted to the experimental treatments. Treatments were composed of untreated synbiotics(US), bacterial synbiotics (BS), yeast synbiotics (YS), mold synbiotics (MS), bacterial and mold synbiotics (BMS), yeast and mold synbiotics (YMS), bacterial and yeast synbiotics (BYS), and bacterial, yeast and mold synbiotics (BYMS). After 7 days of anaerobic fermentation, fermented-TMRs were exposed to air during 1, 3, 5, 7, 14 and 21 days. One hundred forty four (8 treatments ${\times}$ 6 exposing days ${\times}$ 3 replications) fermented- TMRs were manufactured by vinyl bag sized of 43 cm by 58 cm. The results obtained were as follows. Moisture contents of the fermented TMRs anaerobically ranged from 41% to 45%, and was similar to those of basal TMRs. As results of anaerobic fermentation, the concentration of crude protein was decreased by 11.7% to 14.8% in the untreated sample, while was rather increased by 11% when the TMR was fermented with BMYS. And also BMYS treatment showed decreases by 32% for crude fiber, 15.5% for NDF and 26.1% for ADF. Internal temperature of fermented-TMRs was highest at 7 day of exposing in the air. The pH of fermented-TMR juice was significant difference betweentreatments after 7 day of exposing in air, and that of BMS was highest at 14 day after exposing in air (P<0.05). Acid buffering capacity was increased in proportion to the exposing day of TMR, and peaked at 7 or 14 days after exposing. Ammonia concentration of fermented-TMRs was highest at 5 day after exposing in the air. Individual volatile fatty acid of fermented-TMR juice was very low level in all treatments. Although BMYS treatment to TMR inclined to increase in crude protein and decrease in fibers, but there were no positive effects on the fermentation characteristics after exposing in the air by supplementation of anaerobic synbiotics to TMR.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. A.O.A.C. 1995. Official methods of analysis 16th edition. Association of official analytical chemists, Washington, D. C.
  2. Chaney, A. L. and E. P. Marbacch. 1962. Modification reagents for determination of urea and ammonia. Clin. Chem. 8, 130-132
  3. Duncan, D. B. 1955. Multiple range and multiple F tests. Biometrics. 11, 1-42 https://doi.org/10.2307/3001478
  4. Erwin, E. S., D. J. Marco, and E. M. Emery. 1961. Volatile fatty acid analysis of blood and rumen fluid by gas chrom atograohy. J. Dairy Sci. 44, 1768-1770 https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(61)89956-6
  5. Fuller, R. 1989. Probiotics in man and animals. J. Appl. Bact. 66, 365-378 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2672.1989.tb05105.x
  6. Gibson, G. R. and B. M. Roberfroid. 1995. Dietary modulatio of the human colonic microbiota: introducing the concept of prebiotics. J. Nutr. 125, 1401-1412
  7. Gomez-Alarcon, R. A., C. Dudas, and J. T. Huber. 1990. Influence of cultures of Aspergillus oryzae on rumen and total tract digestibility of dietary components. J. Dairy Sci. 73, 703-710 https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(90)78723-1
  8. Graham, H., L., W. Lowgren, D. Pettersson, and P. Aman. 1988. Effect of enzyme supplementation on digestion of a barley/pollards-based pig diet. Nutr. Rep. Inter. 38, 1073-1079
  9. Harrison, G. A., R. W. Henken, K. A. Dawson, R. J. Harmon, and K. B. Barker. 1988. Influenec of addition of yeast culture supplement to diets of lactating cows on ruminal Fermentation and microbial population. J. Dairy Sci. 71, 2967-2975 https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(88)79894-X
  10. Holdman, L. V., E. P. Coto, and W. E. C. Moore. 1977. Anaerobic laboratory manual (4th eds.), Virginia Polytech. Inct. and State Univ. Blackburg, Virginia, USA
  11. Jasaitis, D. K., J. E. Wohlt, and J. L. Evans. 1987. Influence of fed ion content on buffering capacity of ruminant feedstuffs in vitro. J. Dairy Sci. 70, 1391-1403 https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(87)80161-3
  12. Kelly, D. 1998. Probiotics in young and newborn animals. J. Anim. Feed Sci. 7, 15-23
  13. Kizilsimsek, M., R. J. Schmidt, and L. Kung Jr. 2007. Effects of a mixture of lactic acid bacteria applied as a freeze-dried or fresh culture on the fermentation of alfalfa silage. J. Dairy Sci. 90, 5698-5705 https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2007-0448
  14. Martin, S. A. and D. J. Nisbet. 1990. Effect of Aspergillus oryzae fermentation extract on fermentation extract on fermentation of amino acids; bermudagrass and starch by mixed ruminal microorganisms in vitro. J. Anim. Sci. 68, 2142-2149
  15. Martinsson, K. 1991. A comparison between formic acid and an inoculant for the preservation of grass silage for dairy cows. Swedish J. Agric. Res. 21, 121-130
  16. Mathieu, F., J. P. Jouany, J. Sénaud, J. Bohatier, G. Bertin, and M. Mercier. 1996. The effect of Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Aspergillus oryzae on fermentations in the rumen of faunated and defaunated sheep, protozoal and probiotic interactions. Reprod. Nutr. Dev. 36, 271-287 https://doi.org/10.1051/rnd:19960305
  17. McDanald. P. 1981. Clostridia. In the biochemistry of siage, Jihn Wiley and Sons. p. 62. Ltd pitman Press, Bath, Englands
  18. Michalet-Doreau, B. and J. P. Jouany. 1998. Effect of a Saccharomyces cerevisiae culture on nutrient digestion in lactating dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 81, 3214-3221 https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(98)75885-0
  19. Michalet-Doreau, B. and J. P. Jouany. 1998. Effect of a Saccharomyces cerevisiae culture on nutrient digestion in lactating dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 81, 3214-3221 https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(98)75885-0
  20. Mitsuoka, T. 1980. Zonaisaikinno Sekai. Sobunsha 21, 1-34
  21. Muck, R. E. and L. Kung Jr. 1997. Effects of silage additives on ensiling. pp. 187-199, In Silage: Field to Feedbunk. NRAES-99. Northeast Reg. Agric. Eng. Serv., Ithaca, NY
  22. Nisbet, D. J., D. E. Corrier, C. M. Scanlan, A. G. Hollister, R. C. Beier, and J. R. Deloach. 1993. Effect of defined continuous- flow derived bacterial culture and dietary lactose on Salmonella colonization in broiler chicks. Avian Disease 37, 1017-1025 https://doi.org/10.2307/1591908
  23. Nishino, N. H. Wada, M. Yoshida, and H. Shiota. 2004. Microbial counts, fermentation products, and aerobic stability of whole crop corn and a Total Mixed Ration ensiled with and Without inoculation of Lactobacillus casei or Lactocacillus buchneri. J. Dairy Sci. 87, 2563-2570 https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(04)73381-0
  24. Ogimoto, K. and S. Imai. 1981. Atlas of Rumen Microbiology. Japan. Scientific Societies Press. Tokyo, Japan
  25. Park, H. S., Y. H. Yoo, B. S. Jeon, and J. O. Cha. 1996. Effect of Feeding Vianle Yeast and Lactobacillus on Milk Yield and Milk Fat Comntent. J. Anim. Sci. & Technol. (Kor.) 38, 77-84
  26. Pettersson, D., H. Graham, and P. Amen. 1989. Enzyme supplementation of broiler chickens. Ani. Prod. 51, 399-404
  27. Playne, M. J. and P. McDonald. 1966. The buffering constituents of herbage and silage. J. Sci. Food Agric. 17, 264-268 https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.2740170609
  28. Rose, A. H. 1980. Rent research on industrially important strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. In Skimmer, F. A., S. M. Passmore, and R. R. Danenport (eds.), Biology and Activities of yeasts. The Society for Applied Bacteriology Symposium Series 9:103. Academic Press, London. UK
  29. SAS. 1999. SAS/STAT software for PC. Release 8.01. SAS institute Inc., Cary, N. C., U.S.A.
  30. Song, M. K. and H. J. Sohn. 1997. Effect of Feeding Yeast Diets on Lactating Performance of Dairy Cows. J. Anim. Sci. & Technol. (Kor.). 38, 184-190
  31. Van soest, P. J., J. B. Robertson, and B. A. Lezis. 1991. Methods of dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber and non-starch poly-saccharides in relation to animal nutrition. J. dairy Sci. 55, 805-810 https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(72)85575-9
  32. Weinberg, Z. G. and R. E. Muck. 1996. New trends in development and use of inoculants for silage. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 19, 53-68 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6976.1996.tb00253.x
  33. Wiedmeier, R. D. and M. J. Arambel. 1985. Effects of supplemental Saccharomyces cerevisiae and/or Aspergillus oryzae on rumen fermentation. Proceedings, Conference on Rumen Funtion, March 23. Chicago, IL, USA
  34. Williams, P. E. V., G. A. G. Tait, and G. M. Innes. 1991. Effects of yeast culture(Saccharomyces cerevisiae plus growth medium) in the diet of dairy cows in milk patterns in the rumen of steers. J. Anim. Sci. 69, 3016-3026
  35. Woolford, M. K. and J. E. Cook. 1978. A note on the effect on the aerobic deterioration of maize silage on the manipulation of the microflora by means of antibiolotics. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 3, 89-94 https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-8401(78)90026-3

피인용 문헌

  1. Effects of Total Mixed Fermentations with Bean Curd Dregs on Growth Performance of Growing Hanwoo Heifers vol.21, pp.10, 2011, https://doi.org/10.5352/JLS.2011.21.10.1460