Study on Performance Evaluation of Dental X-ray Equipment

치과 방사선 발생기의 성능평가에 관한 연구

  • Jung, Jae-Eun (Department of Digital Management and Information, Nambu University) ;
  • Jung, Jae-Ho (Department of Electronic Engineering, Kwang Woon University) ;
  • Kang, Hee-Doo (Department of Electronic Engineering, Kwang Woon University) ;
  • Lee, Jong-Woong (Department of Radiology, Kyung Hee East West Neo Medical Center) ;
  • Ra, Keuk-Hwan (Department of Electronic Engineering, Kwang Woon University)
  • 정재은 (남부대학교 디지털경영정보학과) ;
  • 정재호 (광운대학교 전자공학과) ;
  • 강희두 (광운대학교 전자공학과) ;
  • 이종웅 (경희대학교 동서신의학병원 영상의학과) ;
  • 나극환 (광운대학교 전자공학과)
  • Published : 2009.11.30

Abstract

I think this will be valuable reference for assuring consistency and homogeneity of clarity and managing dental radiation equipment by experimentation of dental radiation equipment permanent which based on KS C IEC 61223-3-4 standard and KS C IEC 61223-2-7. Put a dental radiation generator and experiment equipment as source and film(sensor) length within 30 em, place the step-wedge above the film(sensor). Tie up tube voltage 60 kVp, tube current 7 mA and then get an each image through CCD sensor and film by changing the exposure time as 0.12sec, 0.25sec, 0.4sec. Repeat the test 5times as a same method. Measure the concentration of each stage of film image, which gained by experiment, using photometer. And the image that gained by CCD sensor, analyze the pixel value's change by using image J, which is analyzing image program provided by NIH(National Institutes of Health). In case of film, while 0.12sec and 0.25sec show regular rising pattern of density gap as exposure time's increase, 0.4sec shows low rather than 0.12sec and 0.25sec. In case of CCD sensor density test, the result shows opposite pattern of film. This makes me think that pixels of CCD's sensor can have 0~255 value but it becomes saturation if the value is over 255. The way that getting clear reception during decreasing human's exposed radiation is one of maintaining an equipment as a best condition. So we should keeping a dental radiation equipment's condition steadily through cyclic permanent test after factor examination. Even digital equipment doesn't maintain a permanent, it can maintain a clarity by post processing of image so that hard to set it as standard of permanent test. Therefore it would be more increase the accuracy that compare a film as standard image. Thus I consider it will be an important measurement to care for dental radiation equipment and warrant homogeneity, consistency of dental image's clarity through comparing pattern which is the result from factor test against cyclic permanent test.

Keywords