Hip & pelvis

  • 제21권4호
  • /
  • Pages.300-306
  • /
  • 2009
  • /
  • 2287-3260(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2287-3279(eISSN)
대한고관절학회 (The Korean Hip Society)
권호 표지

Choice of Bearing Surfaces and Technical Tips to Reduce Complications

  • Park, Sung-Ki (Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University) ;
  • Lee, Jung-Yup (Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University) ;
  • Kim, Shin-Yoon (Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University)
  • 발행 : 2009.12.31

⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Various materials of artificial bearing surfaces are developed and applied to reduce wear and osteolysis and to improve the survival rate of total hip arthroplasty. The survival rate of artificial joint is affected by mechanical properties and biological response. The wear rate of alternative bearing surfaces as ceramic-on-ceramic, metal-on-metal, highly cross-linked polyethylene decreased significantly compared with conventional polyethylene, but long-term results are still under follow-up and several problems have been unsettled. Particularly acetabular component should be in appropriate position to reduce complications. Each bearing surface should be selected considering age, activity, obesity, underlying disease, and socio-economic state of patients because it has its own pros and cons.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Baek SH, Kim SY. Cementless total hip arthroplasty with alumina bearings in patients younger than fifty with femoral head osteonecrosis. J Bone Joint Surg, 90-A: 1314-1320, 2008.
  2. Ball ST, Le Duff MJ, Amstutz HC. Early results of conversion of a failed femoral component in hip resurfacing arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg, 89-A: 735- 741, 2007.
  3. Beksac B, Salas A, Gonzalez Della Valle A, Salvati EA. Wear is reduced in THA performed with highly crosslinked polyethylene. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 467: 1765- 1772, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-008-0661-1
  4. Bragdon CR, Kwon YM, Geller JA, et al. Minimum 6-year followup of highly cross-linked polyethylene in THA. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 465: 122-127, 2007.
  5. Campbell P, Shimmin A, Walter L, Solomon M. Metal sensitivity as a cause of groin pain in metal-on-metal hip resurfacing. J Arthroplasty, 23: 1080-1085, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2007.09.024
  6. Cuckler JM. The rationale for metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 441: 132-136, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.blo.0000193809.85587.f8
  7. Cuckler JM, Moore KD, Lombardi AV Jr, McPherson E, Emerson R. Large versus small femoral heads in metalon- metal total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty,19 (Suppl 3): S41-S44, 2004.
  8. Currier BH, Currier JH, Mayor MB, Lyford KA, Collier JP, Van Citters DW. Evaluation of oxidation and fatigue damage of retrieved crossfire polyethylene acetabular cups. J Bone Joint Surg, 89-A: 2023-2029, 2007.
  9. Daniel J, Ziaee H, Pradhan C, McMinn DJ. Six-year results of a prospective study of metal ion levels in young patients with metal-on-metal hip resurfacings. J Bone Joint Surg, 91-B: 176-179, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.91B2.21654
  10. Davies AP, Willert HG, Campbell PA, Learmonth ID, Case CP. An unusual lymphocytic perivascular infiltration in tissues around contemporary metal-on-metal joint replacements. J Bone Joint Surg, 87-A: 18-27, 2005.
  11. Dumbleton JH, D'Antonio JA, Manley MT, Capello WN, Wang A. The basis for a second-generation highly crosslinked UHMWPE. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 453: 265-271, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.blo.0000238856.61862.7d
  12. Geerdink CH, Grimm B, Vencken W, Heyligers IC, Tonino AJ. Cross-linked compared with historical polyethylene in THA: an 8-year clinical study. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 467: 979-984, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-008-0628-2
  13. Grubl A, Marker M, Brodner W, et al. Long-term followup of metal-on-metal total hip replacement. J Orthop Res, 25: 841-848, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1002/jor.20381
  14. Hart AJ, Sabah S, Henckel J, et al. The painful metal-onmetal hip resurfacing. J Bone Joint Surg, 91-B: 738-744, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.91B6.21682
  15. Hing CB, Young DA, Dalziel RE, Bailey M, Back DL, Shimmin AJ. Narrowing of the neck in resurfacing arthroplasty of the hip: a radiological study. J Bone Joint Surg, 89-B: 1019-1024, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.89B8.18830
  16. Holt G, Murnaqhan C, Reilly J, Meck RM. The biology of aseptic osteolysis. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 460: 240-252, 2007.
  17. Kim SY, Kyung HS, Ihn JC, Cho MR, Koo KH, Kim CY. Cementless metasul metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty in patients less than fifty years old. J Bone Joint Surg, 86- A: 2475-2481, 2004.
  18. Koo KH, Ha YC, Jung WH, Kim SR, Yoo JJ, Kim HJ. Isolated fracture of the ceramic head after thirdgeneration alumina-on-alumina total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg, 90-A: 329-336, 2008.
  19. Korovessis P, Petsinis G, Repanti M, Repantis T. Metallosis after contemporary metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty. Five to nine-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg, 88-A: 1183-1191, 2006.
  20. Kyomoto M, Moro T, Konno T, et al. Enhanced wear resistance of modified cross-linked polyethylene by grafting with poly (2-methacryloyloxyethyl phosphorylcholine). J Biomed Mater Res, 82-A: 10-17, 2007.
  21. Lavigne M, Masse V, Girard J, Roy AG, Vendittoli PA. Return to sport after hip resurfacing or total hip arthroplasty: a randomized study. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot, 94: 361-367, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rco.2007.12.009
  22. Lavigne M, Therrien M, Nantel J, Roy A, Prince F, Vendittoli PA. The functional outcome of hip resurfacing and large-head THA is the same: a randomized, doubleblind study. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 20 June [Epub ahead of print], 2009.
  23. Le Duff MJ, Amstutz HC, Dorey FJ. Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing for obese patients. J Bone Joint Surg, 89-A: 2705-2711, 2007.
  24. Lewis PM, Al-Belooshi A, Olsen M, Schemitch EH, Waddell JP. Prospective randomized trial comparing alumina ceramic-on-ceramic with ceramic-on-conventional polyethylene bearings in total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty, 4 Feb [Epub ahead of print], 2009.
  25. Long WT, Dorr LD, Gendelman V. An American experience with metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasties: a 7-year follow-up study. J Arthroplasty, 19 (Suppl 3): S29- S34, 2004.
  26. Lusty PJ, Tai CC, Sew-Hoy RP, Walter WL, Walter WK, Zicat BA. Third-generation alumina-on-alumina ceramic bearings in cementless total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg, 89-A: 2676-2683, 2007.
  27. Marker DR, Seyler TM, Jinnah RH, Delanois RE, Ulrich SD, Mont MA. Femoral neck fractures after metal-onmetal total hip resurfacing: a prospective cohort study. J Arthroplasty, 22(Suppl 3): S66-S71, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2007.05.017
  28. Mcbryde CW, Revell MP, Thomas AM, Treacy RB, Pynsent PB. The influence of surgical approach on outcome in Birmingham hip resurfacing. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 466: 920-926, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-008-0121-y
  29. Milosev I, Trebse R, Kovac S, Cor A, Pisot V. Survivorship and retrieval analysis of Sikomet metal-onmetal total hip replacements at a mean of seven years. J Bone Joint Surg, 88-A: 1173-1182, 2006.
  30. Mont MA, Seyler TM, Ulrich SD, et al. Effect of changing indications and techniques on total hip resurfacing. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 465: 63-70, 2007.
  31. Nizard R, Pourreyron D, Raould A, Hannouche D, Sedel L. Alumina-on-alumina hip arthroplasty in patients younger than 30 years old. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 466: 317-323, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-007-0068-4
  32. Oral E, Christensen SD, Malhi AS, Wannomae KK, Muratoglu OK. Wear resistance and mechanical properties of highly cross-linked, ultrahigh-molecular weight polyethylene doped with vitamin E. J arthroplasty, 21: 580-591, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2005.07.009
  33. Pandit H, Glyn-Jones S, McLardy-Smith P, et al. Pseudotumours associated with metal-on-metal hip resurfacings. J Bone Joint Surg, 90-B: 847-851, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.90B7.20213
  34. Park YS, Hwang SK, Choy WS, Kim YS, Moon YW, Lim SJ. Ceramic failure after total hip arthroplasty with an alumina-on-alumina bearing. J Bone Joint Surg, 88-A: 780-787, 2006.
  35. Park YS, Moon YW, Lim SJ, Yang JM, Ahn G, Choi YL. Early osteolysis following second-generation metal-onmetal hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg, 87-A: 1515- 1521, 2005.
  36. Purdue PE, Koulouvaris P, Potter HG, Nestor BJ, Sculco TP. The cellular and molecular biology of periprosthetic osteolysis. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 454: 251-261, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.blo.0000238813.95035.1b
  37. Ries MD. Complications in primary total hip arthroplasty: avoidance and management: wear. Instr Course Lect, 52: 257-265, 2003.
  38. Shia DS, Clohisy JC, Schinsky MF, Martell JM, Maloney WJ. THA with highly cross-linked polyethylene in patients 50 years or younger. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 467: 2059- 2065, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-008-0697-2
  39. Steffen R, O'Rourke K, Gill HS, Murray DW. The anterolateral approach leads to less disruption of the femoral head-neck blood supply than the posterior approach during hip resurfacing. J Bone Joint Surg, 89-B: 1293-1298, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.89B10.18974
  40. Tower SS, Currier JH, Currier BH, Lyford KA, Van Citters DW, Mayor MB. Rim cracking of the cross-linked longevity polyethylene acetabular liner after total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg, 89-A: 2212-2217, 2007.
  41. Urban JA, Garvin KL, Boese CK, et al. Ceramic-onpolyethylene bearing surfaces in total hip arthroplasty. Seventeen to twenty-one-year results. J Bone Joint Surg, 83-A: 1688-1694, 2001.
  42. Walter WL, O'toole GC, Walter WK, Ellis A, Zicat BA. Squeaking in ceramic-onceramic hips: the importance of acetabular component orientation. J Arthroplasty, 22: 496-503, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2006.06.018
  43. Willert HG, Buchhorn GH, FayyaziA, et al. Metal-onmetal bearings and hypersensitivity in patients with artificial hip joints. A clinical and histomorphological study. J Bone Joint Surg, 87-A: 28-36, 2005.