Hip & pelvis

The Korean Hip Society (대한고관절학회)
권호 표지

Minimally Invasive Total Hip Arthroplasty

최소 침습 도달법을 이용한 인공고관절 전치환술

  • Song, Joo-Hyoun (Department of Orthopaedics, St. Vincent's Hospital The Catholic University of Korea) ;
  • Lee, Eun-Bong (Department of Orthopaedics, St. Vincent's Hospital The Catholic University of Korea)
  • 송주현 (가톨릭대학교 성빈센트병원 정형외과학교실) ;
  • 이은봉 (가톨릭대학교 성빈센트병원 정형외과학교실)
  • Published : 2009.09.30

⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Minimally invasive surgeries, such as laparoscopic, endoscopic and,arthroscopic surgery are currently being used throughout the world. The field of total hip arthroplasty has over 40 years of experience, and minimally invasive total hip arthtoplasty was introduced to reduce the perioperative morbidities. The advocates for minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty will point out the advantages of reduced pain and early ambulation after the operation because of the minimal soft tissue injury. However, we have to review the advantages and disadvantages of minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty to prevent anyharmful effects of this procedure for the patients who under go it.

최근에 복강경, 내시경 그리고 관절경 수술과 같이 최소 침습법을 이용한 시술이 보편화되었으며, 40년 이상의 경험이 쌓인 인공 고관절 치환술에서도 이와 같은 맥락에서 절개부위를 최소화하는, 소위 최소 침습법에 의한 인공 고관절 치환술이 시도되고 있다. 최소 침습법에 의한 인공고관절 치환술은 절개 부위와 연부 조직 손상이 적어 수술 후 통증 감소와 빠른 회복을 얻을 수 있다는 장점을 내세우고 있으나, 이 술식의 장단점과 주의 사항을 면밀히 검토하여 환자 치료에 있어 부정적인 결과가 초래되는 것을 막아야한다.

Keywords

References

  1. Archibeck MJ, White RE Jr. Learning curve for the twoincision total hip replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 429: 232-238, 2004. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.blo.0000150272.75831.2f
  2. Bal BS, Lowe JA, d Hillard A. Muscle damage in minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty : MRI evidence that it is not significant. Instr Course Lect, 57: 223-229, 2008.
  3. Barrack RL. The mini-incision : occasionally desirable, but rarely necessary. Orthopedics, 27(9):936, 945, 2004.
  4. Berger RA. The technique of minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty using the two-incision approach. Inst Course Lect, 53: 149-155, 2004.
  5. Berger RA. Total hip arthroplasty using the minimally invasive two-incision approach. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 417: 232-241, 2003.
  6. Berger RA. Mini-incisions : Two for the price of one! Orthopedics, 25(5): 472-498, 2002.
  7. Berger RA, Duwelius PJ. The two-incision minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty : thechnique and results. Orthop Clin North Am, 35: 163-172, 2004. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0030-5898(03)00110-X
  8. Berry DJ, Berger RA, Callaghan JJ et al. Minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg, 85-A(11): 2235-2246, 2003.
  9. Bertin KC. Minimally invasive outpatient total hip arthroplasty : a financial analysis. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 435: 154-163, 2005.
  10. Cameron HU. Mini-incision : Visualization is key. Orthopedics, 25: 473, 2002.
  11. Chen DW, Hu CC, Chang YH, Yang WE, Lee MS. Comparison of clinical outcome in primary total hip arthroplasty by conventional anterolateral transgluteal or 2-incision approach. J Arthroplasty, 24: 528-538, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2008.03.016
  12. Chimento GF, Pavone V, Sharrock N, Kahn B, Cahill J, Sculco TP. Minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty : a prospective randomized study. J Arthroplasty, 20(2): 139- 144, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2004.09.061
  13. de Beer J, Petruccelli D, Zalzal P, Winemaker MJ. Singleincision, minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty: length doesn't matter. J Arthroplasty, 19(8): 945-950, 2004.
  14. DiGioia AM 3rd, Plakseychuk AY, Levison TJ, Jaramaz B. Mini-incision technique for total hip arthroplasty with navigation. J Arthroplasty, 18(2): 123-128, 2003. https://doi.org/10.1054/arth.2003.50025
  15. Dorr LD. The appeal of the mini-incision. Orthopedics, 27(9): 937-938, 2004.
  16. Duwelius PJ, Dorr LD. Minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty : An overview of the results. Instr Course Lect, 57: 215-222, 2008.
  17. Fehring TK, Mason JB. Catastrophic complications of minimally invasive hip surgery. A series of three cases. J Bone Joint Surg, 87-A: 711-714, 2005.
  18. Glaser D, Dennis DA, Komistek RD, Miner TM. In vivo comparison of hip mechanics for minimally invasive versus traditional total hip arthroplasty. Clin Biomech 23(2): 127-34, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2007.09.015
  19. Goldstein WM, Branson JJ, Berland KA, Gordon AC. Minimal-incision total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg, 85-A Suppl 4. 33-38, 2003.
  20. Gustke K. Surgical nuances to minimize muscle damage during direct lateral approach in minimally invasive hip replacement. Instr Course Lect, 57: 235-241, 2008.
  21. Hart R, Stipcak V, Janecek M, Visna P. Component position following total hip arthroplasty through a miniinvasive posterolateral approach. Acta Orthop Belg, 71(1): 60-64, 2005.
  22. Higuchi F, Gotoh M, Yamaguchi N et al. Minimally invasive uncemented total hip arthroplasty through an anterolateral approach with a shorter skin incision. J Orthop Sci, 8(6) : 812-817, 2003. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00776-003-0715-x
  23. Howell JR, Garbuz DS, Duncan CP. Minimally invasive hip replacement: rationale, applied anatomy, and instrumentation. Orthop Clin North Am. 35(2): 107-118, 2004. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0030-5898(03)00112-3
  24. Hungerford DS. Minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty : in opposition. J Arthroplasty. 19 (4 Suppl 1): 81-82, 2004. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2004.04.007
  25. Huo MH, Gilbert NF, Parvizi J. What's new in total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg, 89-A: 1874-1885, 2007.
  26. Hurd JL, Potter HG, Dura V, Ranawats CS. Sciatic nerve palsy after primary total hip arthroplasty : a new perspective. J Arthroplasty, 21: 796-802, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2005.08.008
  27. Jameson SS, Howcroft DW, McCaskie AW, Gerrand CH. Injury to the lateral femoral cutaneous nerve during minimally invasive hip surgery : a cadaver study. Ann R Coll Surg Engl, 90(3): 216-220, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1308/003588408X261618
  28. Kennon RE, Keggi JM, Wetmore RS, Zatorski LE, Huo MH, Keggi KJ. Total hip arthroplasty through a minimally invasive anterior surgical approach. J Bone Joint Surg, 85-A Suppl 4: 39-48, 2003.
  29. Levine BR, Klein GR, Di Cesare PE. Surgical approaches in total hip arthroplasty : a review of the mini-incision and MIS literature. Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis, 65(1) : 5-18, 2007.
  30. Lin DH, Jan MH, Liu TK, Lin YF, Hou SM. Effects of anterolateral minimally invasive surgery in total hip arthroplasty on hip muscle strength, walking speed, and functional score. J Arthroplasty, 22(8): 1187-1192, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2006.11.011
  31. Lin YC, Chen CH, Huang HT et al. Minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty using a posterolateral approach: technique and preliminary results. Kaohsiung J Med Sci, 23(12): 611-617, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1607-551X(08)70059-7
  32. Mahmood A, Zafar MS, Majid I, Maffulli N, Thompson J. Minimally invasive hip arthroplasty : a quantitative review of the literature. Br Med Bull, 84: 37-48, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1093/bmb/ldm029
  33. Malik A, Dorr LD. The science of minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 463: 74-84, 2007.
  34. Mardones R, Pagnano MW, Nemanich JP, Trousdale RT. Muscle damage after total hip arthroplasty done with the two-incision and mini-posterior techniques. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 441: 63-67, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.blo.0000194727.55372.04
  35. McGrory B, Callaghan J, Kraay M et al. Editorial: minimally invasive and small-incision joint replacement surgery: what surgeons should consider. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 440: 251-254, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.blo.0000187339.02380.70
  36. Meneghini RM, Pagnano MW, Trousdale RT, Hozack WJ. Muscle damage during MIS total hip arthroplasty : Smith- Petersen versus posterior approach. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 453: 293-298, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.blo.0000238859.46615.34
  37. Nakamura S, Matsuda K, Arai N, Wakimoto N, Matsushita T. Mini-incision posterior approach for total hip arthroplasty. Int Orthop, 28: 214-217, 2004.
  38. Najarian BC, Kilgore JE, Markel DC. Evaluation of component positioning in primary total hip arthroplasty using an imageless navigation device compared with traditional methods. J Arthroplasty, 24: 15-21, 2009.
  39. Nakata K, Nishikawa M, Yamamoto K, Hirota S, Yoshikawa H. A clinical comparative study of the direct anterior with mini-posterior approach : two consecutive series. J Arthroplasty. 24: 698-704, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2008.04.012
  40. Noble PC, Johnston JD, Alexander JA et al. Making minimally invasive THR safe : conclusions from biomechanical simulation and analysis. Int Orthop, 31 Suppl 1: S25-S28, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-007-0432-8
  41. Ogonda L, Wilson R, Archbold P et al. A minimal-incision technique in total hip arthroplasty does not improve early postoperative outcomes. A prospective, randomized, controlled trial. J Bone Joint Surg. 87-A : 701-710, 2005.
  42. Pagnano MW, Trousdale RT, Meneghini RM, Hanssen AD. Slower recovery after two-incision than miniposterior-incision total hip arthroplasty. A randomized clinical trial. J Bone Joint Surg, 90-A : 1000-1006, 2008.
  43. Parratte S, Pagnano MW. Muscle damage during minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty : Cadaver-based evidence that it is significant. Instr Course Lect, 57: 231- 234, 2008.
  44. Parvizi J, Sharkey PF, Pour AE, Rapuri V, Hozack WJ, Rothman RH. Hip arthroplasty with minimally invasive surgery : a survey comparing the opinion of highly qualified experts vs patients. J Arthroplasty. 21 (6 Suppl 2): 38-46, 2006.
  45. Pilot P, Kerens B, Draijer WF et al. Is minimally invasive surgery less invasive in total hip replacement? A pilot study. Injury, 37 Suppl 5: S17-S23, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-1383(07)70007-4
  46. Pour AE, Parvizi J, Sharkey PF, Hozack WJ, Rothman RH. Minimally invasive hip arthroplasty : what role does patient preconditioning play? J Bone Joint Surg, 89-A: 1920-1927, 2007.
  47. Rahman W, Richard CJ, Duncan CP. Surgical nuances to minimize muscle damage during the anterolateral intermuscular approach in minimally invasive hip replacement. Instr Course Lect, 57: 243-247, 2008.
  48. Reininga IH, Wagenmakers R, van den Akker-Scheek I et al. Effectiveness of computer-navigated minimally invasive total hip surgery compared to conventional total hip arthroplasty : design of a randomized controlled trial. BMC Musculoskelet Disord, 8:4, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-8-4
  49. Sculco TP. Minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty : in Affirmative. J Arthoplasty, 19(4 suppl 1) : 78-84, 2004.
  50. Sculco TP. Is smaller necessarily better? Am J Orthopedics, 32(4): 169, 2003.
  51. Sculco TP, Jordan LC. The mini-incision approach to total hip arthroplasty. Instr Course Lect, 53: 141-147, 2004.
  52. Sculco TP, Jordan LC, Water WL. Minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty. Orthop Clin North Am, 35: 137-142, 2004. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0030-5898(03)00116-0
  53. Szendroi M, Sztrinkai G, Vass R, Kiss J. The impact of minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty on the standard procedure. Int Orthop, 30(3): 167-171, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-005-0049-8
  54. Vail TP, Callaghan JJ. Minimal incision total hip arthroplasty. J Am Acad Orthop Surg, 15(12) :707-715, 2007.
  55. Waldman BJ. Advancements in minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty. Orthopedics, 26(8 Suppl) : s833-s836 2003.
  56. Ward SR, Jones RE, Long WT, Thomas DJ, Dorr LD. Functional recovery of muscle after minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty. Instr Coure Lect, 57: 249-254, 2008.
  57. Wenz JF, Gurkan I, Jibodh SR. Mini-incision total hip arthroplasty : a comparative assessment of perioperative outcomes. Orthopedics, 25(10) : 1031-1043, 2002.
  58. Wong TC, Chan B, Lam D. Minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty in a Chinese population. Orthopedics, 30(6) : 483-486, 2007.
  59. Woolson ST, Mow CS, Syquia JF, Lannin JV, Schurman DJ. Comparison of primary total hip replacements performed with a standard incision or a mini-incision. J Bone Joint Surg, 86-A: 1353-1358, 2004.