Comparative Analysis of Limited Resection and Conventional Resection for Pancreatic Benign Lesions Focused on Perioperative Diabetes and Pancreatic Fistula

제한적 절제술과 근치적 절제술 후의 췌장루와 당뇨 발생에 대한 비교분석

  • Choi, Min-Young (Department of Surger, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University) ;
  • You, Dong-Do (Department of Surger, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University) ;
  • Lee, Hyung-Geun (Department of Surger, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University) ;
  • Heo, Jin-Seok (Department of Surger, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University) ;
  • Choi, Seong-Ho (Department of Surger, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University) ;
  • Choi, Dong-Wook (Department of Surger, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University)
  • 최민영 (성균관대학교 의과대학 삼성서울병원 외과) ;
  • 유동도 (성균관대학교 의과대학 삼성서울병원 외과) ;
  • 이형근 (성균관대학교 의과대학 삼성서울병원 외과) ;
  • 허진석 (성균관대학교 의과대학 삼성서울병원 외과) ;
  • 최성호 (성균관대학교 의과대학 삼성서울병원 외과) ;
  • 최동욱 (성균관대학교 의과대학 삼성서울병원 외과)
  • Published : 2009.09.30

Abstract

Purpose: Pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) or distal pancreatectomy (DP) are treatments used for pancreatic benign neoplasms even though both of these treatments result in significant loss of normal pancreatic parenchyma; this leads to subsequent impairment of exocrine and endocrine pancreatic function. The purpose of this study is to provide short-and long-term result of limited resection (LR) in a single center. Methods: Two-hundred thirty patients who had undergone pancreatic resection between April1998 and September 2008 for benign neoplasms were reviewed retrospectively. DP was performed in 102 patients, LR in 77, PD in 51 patients. The definitions of the International Study Group of Pancreatic Fistula (ISGPF) were applied to postoperative pancreatic fistulas (POPF), perioperative endocrine function was evaluated through oral glucose tolerance test. Results: LR includes 42 enucleation, 24 central pancreatectomy, and 11 uncinate process resection. No deaths occurred to patients during the study review period; POPF was detected in 50 patients (65%), 37 patients with grade A and 13 patients with grade B or C. POPF occurred 65% of the time after LR, more frequently compared to the occurrance after PD or DP (58%), but this was not statistically significant (P =.322). After LR, there were 2 patients with new onset diabetes (3%), while 26 (17%) patients developed diabetes after DP or PD (P = .002). Conclusion: LR may preserve endocrine and exocrine function. While mortality is low with the use of LR, it is associated with a higher pancreatic-leakage rate. The precise management of benign pancreatic lesions remains in evolution.

Keywords

References

  1. Whipple AO, Parsons WB, Mullins CR. Treatment of carcinoma of the ampulla of vater. Ann Surg 1935;102:763-779. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000658-193510000-00023
  2. Jones RC. Management of pancreatic trauma. Ann Surg 1978;187:555-564. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000658-197805000-00015
  3. Cameron JL, Pitt HA, Yeo CJ, Lillemoe KD, Kaufman HS, Coleman J. One hundred and forty-five consecutive pancreaticoduodenectomies without mortality. Ann Surg 1993;217:430-435 https://doi.org/10.1097/00000658-199305010-00002
  4. Machado MC, Montagnini AL, Machado MA, et al. (Cystic neoplasm of the pancreas: analysis of 24 cases). Rev Hosp Clin Fac Med Sao Paulo 1994;49:208-212.
  5. Bottger TC, Junginger T. Factors influencing morbidity and mortality after pancreaticoduodenectomy: critical analysis of 221 resections. World J Surg 1999;23:164-171 https://doi.org/10.1007/PL00013170
  6. Miedema BW, Sarr MG, van Heerden JA, Nagorney DM, Mcllrath DC, Ilstrup D. Complications following pancreaticoduodenectomy. Current management. Arch Surg 1992;127:945-949 https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.1992.01420080079012
  7. Sperti C, Pasquali C, Ferronato A, Pedrazzoli S. Median pancreatectomy for tumors of the neck and body of the pancreas. J Am Coll Surg 2000;190:711-716. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1072-7515(00)00286-6
  8. Zhou J, Dong M, Kong F. Li Y, Tian Y. Central pancreatectomy for benign tumors of the neck and body of the pancreas: Report of eight cases. J Surg Oncol 2009.
  9. Lee JB, Ahn SI, Lee KY, et al. Risk Factors Affecting Pancreatic Fistula after Pancreaticoduodenectomy. Korean J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2007;Sep;11(3):25-31.
  10. Lewis G, Krige JE, Bornman PC, Terblanche J. Traumatic pancreatic pseudocysts. Br J Surg 1993;80:89-93. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.1800800129
  11. Warshaw AL, Rattner DW. Fernandez-del Castillo C, Z'Graggen K. Middle segment pancreatectomy: a novel technique for conserving pancreatic tissue. Arch Surg 1998;133:327-331. https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.133.3.327
  12. Rotman N, Fagniez PL. Medial pancreatectomy. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 2000;7:453-455. https://doi.org/10.1007/s005340070014
  13. Yasuda H, Takada T, Toyota N, et al. Limited pancreatectomy: significance of postoperative maintenance of pancreatic exocrine function. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 2000;7:466-472. https://doi.org/10.1007/s005340070016
  14. Molino D, Perrotti P, Antropoli C, Bottino V, Napoli V, Fioretto R. [Central segmental pancreatectomy in benign and borderline neoplasms of the pancreatic isthmus and body]. Chir Ital 2001;53:319-325.
  15. Su CH, Shyr YM, Lui WY, P'Eng F K. Segmental pancreatectomy for benign tumor of the pancreas. Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi (Taipei) 2002;65:608-613.
  16. Slezak LA, Andersen DK. Pancreatic resection: effects on glucose metabolism. World J Surg 2001;25:452-460. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002680020337
  17. Witzigmann H, Max D, Uhlmann D, et al. Quality of life in chronic pancreatitis: a prospective trial comparing classical whipple procedure and duodenum-preserving pancreatic head resection. J Gastrointest Surg 2002;6:173-179 https://doi.org/10.1016/S1091-255X(01)00023-3
  18. Christein JD, Smoot RL, Farnell MB. Central pancreatectomy: a technique for the resection of pancreatic neck lesions. Arch Surg 2006;141:293-299. https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.141.3.293
  19. Pratt W, Maithel SK, Vanounou T, Callery MP, Vollmer CM, Jr. Postoperative pancreatic jistulas are not equivalent after proximal, distal, and central pancreatectomy. J Gastrointest Surg 2006;10:1264-1278 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gassur.2006.07.011
  20. Tien YW, Hu RH, Hung JS, Wang HP, Lee PH. Noninvasive pancreatic cystic neoplasms can be safely and effectively treated by limited pancreatectomy. Ann Surg Oncol 2008;15:193-198. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-007-9613-3
  21. Yeo CJ, Cameron JL, Maher MM, et al. A prospective randomized trial of pancreaticogastrostomy versus pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Ann Surg 1995;222:580-588 https://doi.org/10.1097/00000658-199510000-00014
  22. Yang YM, Tian XD, Zhuang Y, Wang WM, Wan YL, Huang YT. Risk factors of pancreatic leakage after pancreaticoduodenectomy. World J Gastroenterol 2005;11:2456-2461. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v11.i16.2456
  23. Reid- Lombardo KM, Farnell MB, Crippa S, et al. Pancreatic anastomotic leakage after pancreaticoduodenectomy in 1,507 patients: a report from the Pancreatic Anastomotic Leak Study Group. J Gastrointest Surg 2007;11:1451-1458 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-007-0270-4
  24. Choe YM, Lee KY, Oh CA, et al. Risk factors affecting pancreatic fistulas after pancreaticoduodenectomy. World J Gastroenterol 2008;14:6970-6974. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.14.6970
  25. Hayashibe A, Kameyama M. Duct-to-mucosa pancreaticojejunostomies with a hard pancreas and dilated pancreatic duct and duct-to-mucosa pancreaticojejunostomies with a soft pancreas and non-dilate dduct. HPB (Oxford) 2008;10:54-57. https://doi.org/10.1080/13651820701883130
  26. Parr ZE, Sutherland FR. Bathe OF, Dixon E. Pancreatic fistulae: are we making progress? J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 2008;15:563-569. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00534-008-1349-3
  27. Shrikhande SV, D'Souza MA. Pancreatic fistula after pancreatectomy: evolving definitions, preventive strategies and modern management. World J Gastroenterol 2008;14:5789-5796. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.14.5789
  28. Callery MP, Pratt WB, Vollmer CM, Jr. Prevention and management of pancreatic fistula. J Gastrointest Surg 2009;13:163-173. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-008-0534-7
  29. Schmidt CM, Choi J, Powell ES, et al. Pancreatic fistula following pancreaticoduodenectomy: clinical predictors and patient outcomes. HPB Surg 2009;2009:404-520.