Evaluation of Oral Malodor for Patients Visiting A Dental Clinic

일 치과의원 내원환자의 구취에 대한 평가

  • Kim, Hyun-Dae (Dept. of Dental Hygiene, Dong Pusan College Univ.) ;
  • Cho, Young-Ha (Graduate School of Public Health, Inje Univ.)
  • 김현대 (동부산대학 치위생과) ;
  • 조영하 (인제대학교 보건대학원 보건관리학과)
  • Received : 2009.08.28
  • Accepted : 2009.10.23
  • Published : 2009.10.31

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to find out the degree of self-consciousness of oral malodor, the status of oral hygiene care, some oral examination factors, and measurement values of malodor compounds through conduction oral examination and questionnaire survey, and measuring volatile malodor compounds by instrumental analysis. The data were collected from 155 patients visiting a dental clinic by using a self-administered questionnaire, conducting oral examination for halitosis, and measuring malodor compounds with Oral Chroma. The rate of recognizing their breath as 'somewhat bad' were 80.0% for the female patients and 74.3% for the male, and, however, 14.3% of the male recognized their breath as 'very bad' while 18.8% of the female did not recognized oral malodor, showing statistically significant difference between gender(p=0.004). The average concentrations of volatile sulfur compounds measured by Oral Chroma were 1.65 ng/10 ml for hydrogen sulfide, 1.71 ng/10 ml for methyl mercaptan and 1.66 ng/10 ml for dimethyl sulfide, on the average, respectively, exceeding malodor threshold levels of all 3 compounds, and were significantly higher in the male group than those in the female, also exceeding all threshold levels except hydrogen sulfide values of the female group. The type of oral malodor was the most prevalent for Type I as 23.2%, followed by Type V, Type IV, Type II whileas Type I and Type IV in the female as 30.6% and 25.9% respectively, showing statistically significant difference by gender(p=0.006). The correlations among oral examination indices was the highest between tongue fur score and simplified oral hygiene index, followed by a significant reverse correlation between the number of fixed prosthodontic teeth and the number of dental caries(p=0.000).

Keywords

References

  1. Moss S: Halitosis and oral malodour, FDI's Scientific commission, FDI world, 1998.
  2. Heo HY: A study about the relationship between worker's mouth-odor survey and factor analysis. Master's thesis of Dankook Univeristy, pp.19-24, 2003.
  3. Chae SH et al.: Effectiveness of professional plaque control on oral malodor. Oral Biology Research 29(2): 29-36, 2005.
  4. Kim JS: Fusion halitosis stroy. Stationery office of Kyung Hee University, pp.17-19, 2006.
  5. Lee GR: The prevalence of halitosis and it's related factors among some dental hygiene students. Oral Biology Research 31(2): 286-294, 2007.
  6. Hideo M et al..: Correlation between volatile sulphur compounds and certain oral health measurement in the general population. J Periodontal 66: 679-684, 1995. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1995.66.8.679
  7. Tonzetich J: An indicatior of health status and oral cleanliness. Int Dent J 28: 309-319, 1978.
  8. Derogatis LR, Lipman RC, Covi I: An outpatient psychiatric rating scale. Psycho Pharmacol Bull: 9-13, 1973.
  9. Jae YJ: Correlation coefficiency between the oral malodor and the critical periodontal index. Masters thesis of Dankook Univeristy, pp.25-30, 2004.
  10. Kang YB: Body odor revolution. Gold owl Ltd, pp.4-36, 2005.
  11. Lee ES et al.: A study on research of oral environment stae according to halitosis 27(2): 61-75, 2003.
  12. Rosenberg M, Christopher AG, McCulloch CAG: Measurement of oral malodor in current methods and future prospects. J Priodontol 63:776-782, 1992 https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1992.63.9.776
  13. Lee KS: An epidemiological study on malodor status in Korean people. Ph.D. thesis of Dankook University. pp.12-18, 1999.
  14. Persson S et al.: The formation of hydrogen sulfide and methyl mercaptan by oral bacteria. Oral Microbiol Immunol 5: 195-201, 1990 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-302X.1990.tb00645.x
  15. Jo JW, Sin SC, Seo HS: Tongue plaque removal effect according to tongue cleaner types. Oral Biology Research 27(1); 257-261, 2003.
  16. Yaegaki K. Coil JM: Examination, classification and treatment of halitosis in clinical perspectives. J Can Dent Asoc 66(5): 257-261, 2000.
  17. Iwata K. Horikawa T, Namikawa I: Medical and dental microiology. Tokyo Ishiyaku: 125-140, 1985
  18. Yoon MS, Youn HJ: A study on subjective symptoms of a oral malodor in Korea adults. J Dent Hyg Sci 8(3): 123-129, 2008.
  19. Bosy A et al.: Relationship of independence in discrete subpopulation. J Periodontol 65(1): 37-46, 1994.
  20. Kim JB et al.: A clinical study of toothpaste containing monofluorophosphate, chlorhexidine, flavonoid & vitamine-E on the inhibition of dental plaque formation & reducing oral malordor. Oral Biology Research 15(2): 187, 1991.