3D CT를 이용한 비구 컵 주위 골용해 측정 및 임상 결과와의 관련성

Measurements of Socket Osteolysis with using 3D CT and their Correlation with the Clinical Outcome

  • 손원용 (고려대학교 의과대학 정형외과학교실) ;
  • 오종건 (고려대학교 의과대학 정형외과학교실) ;
  • 윤호현 (고려대학교 의과대학 정형외과학교실) ;
  • 윤지열 (고려대학교 의과대학 정형외과학교실) ;
  • 김승주 (고려대학교 의과대학 정형외과학교실)
  • Shon, Won-Yong (Department of Orthopedic Surgery, College of Medicine, Korea University) ;
  • Oh, Jong-Gun (Department of Orthopedic Surgery, College of Medicine, Korea University) ;
  • Yun, Ho-Hyun (Department of Orthopedic Surgery, College of Medicine, Korea University) ;
  • Yoon, Ji-Yeol (Department of Orthopedic Surgery, College of Medicine, Korea University) ;
  • Kim, Seung-Ju (Department of Orthopedic Surgery, College of Medicine, Korea University)
  • 발행 : 2009.03.31

초록

목적: 골반골 주위에서 발생한 골 용해 크기 및 위치를 측정하고 임상 성적과의 관련성을 알아 보고자 하였다. 대상 및 방법: 무 시멘트형 비구컵을 사용한 인공 고관절 전치환술을 받은 환자 97명 (116례) 에게 3D CT 가 시행되었고, 이 중 명확한 골 용해를 가진 40례(31 환자)에 대해 연구를 시행하였다. 대상 환자들은 수술 후 6-12주에 방사선 사진을 촬영하였고, 추시 기간이 18개월 이상이며 감염의 과거력이 없었다. 골 용해의 크기 1 $cm^{3}$미만(A), 1 $cm^{3}$에서 2 $cm^{3}$ 미만(B), $cm^{3}$에서 3 $cm^{3}$ 미만(C), 3 $cm^{3}$(D) 이상의 4개의 군으로 분류 하였으며, 골 용해의 위치를 전방, 후방, 상방, 하방, 중앙의 5 군으로 분류하였다. 골 용해 크기, 골 용해 위치, 폴리에틸렌 마모와 임상결과(Harris hip score)간의 관련성을 통계학적으로 분석하였다. 결과: 골 용해군의 평균 체적은 3.2 $cm^{3}$ 이었으며 (A 군 14 례, B 군 11 례, C 군 4례, D 군은 11례) 골 용해 크기와 임상성적간에 통계적으로 유의한 상관관계를 보였다(Rs=-0569). 그러나 골 용해의 위치에 따른 분류 상 전방 18례, 상방 5례, 후방 10례, 하방 33례, 중앙 32례 이었으며 골 용해 위치와 임상성적간에 통계적으로 유의한 차이는 없었다(P=0.35). 결론: 골 용해 크기와 임상 성적 사이에는 의미있는 상관 관계가 보였고(Rs=-0569), 특히 3 $cm^{3}$ 이상의 골 용해 군에서는 통계학적으로 유의한 임상성적의 감소가 관찰 되었다 (P=0.022). 이는 추 후 골 용해에 대한 치료를 결정하는데 있어 하나의 지침이 될 수 있으리라 사료된다.住午䈵弲〰㥟瘱㕮㉟㠳⹴楦住午䈵弲〰㥟瘱㕮㉟ㄵ㈀Ȁ᠀聫⨀Ȁᜀ€ᙏ体䡂㕟㈰〹彶ㄵ渲弱㔲Ȁᜀ⨀Ȁᘀ@ᕏ体䡂㕟㈰〹彶ㄵ渲弱㔲섭섖住午䈵弲〰㥟瘱㕮㉟ㄵ㈀섂돀⨀堘�⨀は⨀餂돐偯⨀ꢶ�⨀塯⨀焂돐஗⨀஗⨀渲弱㔲Ȁᜀね⨀Ȁᘀ@ᕏ体䡂㕟㈰〹彶ㄵ渲弱㔲섄섃전?⨀?⨀住午䈵弲〰㥟瘱㕮㉟ㄵ㈀住午䈵鄌돀硩⨀堘�⨀ꁺ⨀椌돐쁺⨀�?⨀졺⨀䄌덐�⨀뤀돐ꡬ⨀ᴄ䃽஗⨀䀠Ȇ〠獯牴⁳畢桥慰ソソソソᠠ⨀⨀†࡯⨀࡯⨀섂돀⨀堘�⨀꠿⨀餂돐ၲ⨀ꢶ�⨀퀿⨀䄁덀⨀䀁ヹ⨀⣹⨀㋹⨀砆⨀က؀惹⨀壹⨀拹⨀栆⨀က਀䤀돀桯⨀룽஗⨀ࡴ⨀댐ꡰ⨀ꇅĀĀᠨ⨀砗速⨀速⨀ကက†⨀耀ༀ섂돀⨀堘�⨀頮ភ⨀餂돐5ភ⨀ꢶ�⨀쀮ភ⨀턁덀邕⨀퀁஗⨀為﾿缀Ā

Purpose: We wanted to measure the size of the osteolysis of the pelvis and to quantify its location and we wanted to assess the correlation of these measurements with the clinical result. Materials and methods: We evaluated 40 hips (31 patients) that showed definitive osteolysis among 116 hips (97 patients) that underwent 3 dimensional CT scanning post-operatively after total hip arthroplasties with using cementless acetabular cups. The inclusion criteria were a follow up duration of more than 18 months and no history of infection. The radiographs were obtained at the 6th to 12th week postoperatively. The size of pelvic osteolysis was divided into 4 groups (less than 1 $cm^{3}$ (A), between 1 $cm^{3}$ to 2 $cm^{3}$ (B), between 2 $cm^{3}$ to 3 $cm^{3}$ (C), more than 3 $cm^{3}$(D)), and the location of osteolysis was divided into 5 groups (anterior, posterior, superior, inferior and central) The size and location of osteolysis and the wear of the polyethylene were analysed in relation to the clinical outcome, which was assessed using the Harris Hip Score). Results: The average size of the osteolysis was 3.2 $cm^{3}$ (A 14 cases in group A, B 11 cases in group B, C 4 cases in group C, and D 11 cases in group D). There was significant correlation between the size of the osteolysis and the clinical outcome (Rs=-0569). However, there was no significant correlation between the osteolysis location (Anterior: 18 cases, Superior: 5 cases, Posterior: 10 cases, Inferior: 33 cases and Central: 32 cases) and the clinical outcome (P=0.35). Conclusion: There is a significant correlation between the size of the osteolysis and the Harris Hip Score (Rs=- 0569). Especially, a pelvic osteolysis of more than 3 $cm^{3}$ was found to be correlated with a decreased postoperative HHS (P=0.022). We hope that these results may be useful to help guide the treatment of osteolysis.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Arlot ME, Bonjean M, Chavassieux PM, Meunier PJ: Bone histology in adults with aseptic necrosis. Histomorphometric evaluation of iliac biopsies in seventyseven patients. J Bone Joint Surg, 65 A: 1319-1327, 1983.
  2. Claus AM, Engh CA Jr., Sychterz CJ, Xenos JS, Orishimo KF, Engh CA, Sr.: Radiographic definition of pelvic osteolysis following total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg, 85-A: 1519-1526, 2003.
  3. Howie DW, Neale SD, Susan D, Stamenkov R, McGee A, Taylor DJ, Findlay DM: Progression of acetabular periprosthetic osteolytic lesions measured with computed tomography J Bone Joint Surg ,89-A:1818-1825.
  4. Engelbrecht DJ, Weber FA, Sweet MB, Jakim I: Longterm results of revision total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg, 72-B: 41-45, 1990.
  5. Engh CA Jr, Culpepper WJ 2nd, Engh CA: Long-term results of use of the anatomic medullary locking prosthesis in total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg, 79-A: 177-84, 1997.
  6. Goldring SR, Schiller AL, Roelke M, Rourke CM, O'Neil DA, Harris WH: The synovial-like membrane at the bone-cement interface in loose total hip replacements and its proposed role in bone lysis. J Bone Joint Surg, 65-A: 575-84, 1983.
  7. Harris WH: Wear and periprosthetic osteolysis: the problem. Clin Orthop. 393: 66-70, 2001. https://doi.org/10.1097/00003086-200112000-00007
  8. Hozack WJ, Mesa JJ, Carey C, Rothman RH: Relationship between polyethylene wear, pelvic osteolysis, and clinical symptomatology in patients with cementless acetabular components. A framework for decision making. J Arthroplasty, 11: 769-772, 1996. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-5403(96)80175-6
  9. Jerosch J, Steinbeck J, Fuchs S, Kirchhoff C: Radiologic evaluation of acetabular defects on acetabular loosening of hip alloarthroplasty. Unfallchirurg, 99: 727-733, 1996. https://doi.org/10.1007/s001130050048
  10. Kitamura N, Leung SB, Engh CA, Sr.: Characteristics of pelvic osteolysis on computed tomography after total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 441: 291-297, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.blo.0000192359.12573.15
  11. Kitamura N, Pappedemos PC, Duffy PR, 3rd, et al.: The value of anteroposterior pelvic radiographs for evaluating pelvic osteolysis. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 453: 239-245, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.blo.0000246554.41058.8d
  12. Lavernia CJ: Cost-effectiveness of early surgical intervention in silent osteolysis. J Arthroplasty, 13: 277-279, 1998. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-5403(98)90172-3
  13. Lavernia C, Tsao AK, Hungerford DS.: Silent osteolysis: polyethylene debris in cementless total hip replacement. Read at the Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons.Feb 18-23; San Francisco, CA; 1993.
  14. Lee WS , Han CD, Kim SJ, Kang ES, Park JC: Effect of Polyethylene Particles on Osteoblasts in Pathogenesis of Osteolysis J. of Korean Orthop, Assoc; 38: 624-630, 2003.
  15. Looney RJ, Boyd A, Totterman S, et al.: Volumetric computerized tomography as a measurement of periprosthetic acetabular osteolysis and its correlation with wear. Arthritis Res, 4: 59-63, 2002.
  16. Maloney WJ, Galante JO, Anderson M et al.: Fixation, polyethylene wear, and pelvic osteolysis in primary total hip replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res: 369: 157-164, 1999. https://doi.org/10.1097/00003086-199912000-00016
  17. Maloney WJ, Peters P, Engh CA, Chandler H: Severe osteolysis of the pelvic in association with acetabular replacement without cement. J Bone Joint Surg, 75-A: 1627-1635, 1993.
  18. Maloney WJ: Osteolysis and aseptic loosening: Pathogenesis. Revision total hip arthroplasty: 13-24, 1999.
  19. Puri L, Wixson RL, Stern SH, Kohli J, Hendrix RW, Stulberg SD: Use of helical computed tomography for the assessment of acetabular osteolysis after total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg, 84-A: 609-614, 2002.
  20. Schwarz EM, Campbell D, Totterman S, Boyd A, O`Keefe RJ, Looney RJ: Use of volumetric computerized tomography as a primary outcome measure to evaluate drug efficacy in the prevention of periprosthetic osteolysis. J Orthop Res, 21: 1049-1055, 2003. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0736-0266(03)00093-7
  21. Serena Leung, Douglas Naudie, et al.: Computed Tomography in the Assessment of Periacetabular Osteolysis. J Bone Joint Surg, 87-A: 592-597, 2005.
  22. Southwell DG, Bechtold JE, Lew WD, Schmidt AH: Improving the detection of acetabular osteolysis using oblique radiographs. J Bone Joint Surg, 81-B: 289-295, 1999.
  23. Walde TA, Weiland DE, Leung SB, et al.: Comparison of CT, MRI, and radiographs in assessing pelvic osteolysis: a cadaveric study. Clin Orthop Relat Res: 138-144, 2005.
  24. Wenz JF, Hauser DL, Scott WW, et al.: Observer variation in the detection of acetabular bone deficiencies. Skeletal Radiol, 26: 272-278, 1997. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002560050234
  25. Zicat B, Engh CA, Gokcen E: Patterns of osteolysis around total hip components inserted with and without cement. J Bone Joint Surg, 77-A: 432-439, 1995.